中国法院绩效考评制度研究_同构性_和_双轨制_的逻辑及其问题

©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.:(1970-),,,,RussellWheeler,JudicialAdministration:ItsRelationtoJudicialIndependence,23(NationalCenterofStateCourts,PulicationNo.R-106,1988).[]A:,,2002,IV,0104833300,(,100871):,;,,,:;;;:DF8:A:100626128(2008)0520070215RussellWheeler,[1](P186),,,,07()20085(83)©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.[2](P11),,(,),,,,,[3](P113-324),,(performancemeasurement)(),,,,(),,,,?,??,?,?,?ZNH,20059H(),448,(,),:,():11,;21,,,17,,,,:,2004,[]H::,,2005,4-5,,H()4,H(),181©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.:2004,S,S,:;:;::,2003,,,,,[4](P38),;120,SJ:,,,20032005,;;;,,9272006,018,018;10%,2;,1;1%,2,,2,:,200712,148H40,,,,H(),20H2,,,H(),22-24S2004,:=(1-),,,S:(),:,200717©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.:,,,,,,,,,,,?,,,[5](P2),?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,()1883,;[6](P264)1978,[7],,37J:,S(S,21)(),2007,,,,,,,,,,,,,:,2005,4,Rodgers,R.&Hunter,J.E.,AFoundationofGoodManagementPracticeinGovernment:Man2agementbyObjectives,PublicAdministrationReview,52(1992),pp.27-39.©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.[6](P278),,,,[8],,(,),,,,,?,,[9](P21),,?,,,,,,,;,,,,(,)1986,(),,,,,47:(),(),(),(),:,2005,5,:,1997,[]:(),,2006,1986,3404(1,31,365,3007),13866,10217,(),1987,,10©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.[10](P319),,(),??,,,,,,()[11](P31),,,,,,,,,,?,,,;5796::(),;;,6,20028,23,,,,:,19941:(46);(47)198315:,,(),:([1999]22),:,2000©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.[12](P22),,,,,,[13](P8-10),,11;21;31,,;41,,,,,,11;21;31,;41,;51,,,;,,,()()1,,,,,(),,67,(),20022©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.[14](P19),()2050,[15](P16-18),20,:,,,,[16](P6),,,77,,,,,©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.[17](P51),1943,:,195110:,(),[18]1954,,,,,,,,,,,,,,()(),,,(),,(),,,(,),?,(,,),,()(),[11](P31),,(),,,87,4,:,2001,7,27-32©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.(),,,?,,(),,,,,,,97,Grossman,Sanford&OliverHart,TheCostsandBenefitsofOwnership:ATheoryofVerticalandLateralInte2gration,JournalofPoliticalEconomy94(1986),pp.691-719;Hart,Oliver&JohnMoore,PropertyRightsandtheNatureoftheFirm,JournalofPoliticalEconomy109(1990),pp.1119-1158.,:,198012,:,19814;:,19816;:,19816,,:,:,2000,88-145,(12)(1999),:;:;:;:;:,,,?:,:,1998,133©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.[19](P56),,,,,,,,,,,[19](P54),,,[20](P74),,,,,[20](P75),(),,[20](P75),,,,,,,[21](P236-237),,,,,,,(),,,?,,,,();,;;081951910,,195195,1954,,©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.[22](P19),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,?,,,,,;,;,,,,,,,,33,,,,,,,,(incentivecompatibility)18,,,;,,,,©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.[23](P81),,,,,,,,,,,,,28,:,20075©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.(),,,()(),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;,;,,,;,,,,,,,:[1][J].,1999,(6).[2][J].,2005,(12).[3]Behn.R.D.TheBigQuestionsofPublicManagement[J].PublicAdministrationReview,1995,(55).[4].[J].38,:,:,2001,1-30©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.(2).[5].[M].:,2001.[6][]J.:[M].,.:,2006.[7]PatriciaW.Ingraham.TheReformGame[A].P.W.IngrahamandD.H.Rosenbloom.ThePromiseandParadoxofCivilServiceReform[C].Pittsburgh,PA:UniversityofPittsburghPress,1992.[8].[J].,1993,(5).[9][]H.:[M]..,2005.[10][A]..[C].:,2002.[11].[J].,1999,(6).[12].[M].:,2007.[13].[J].,1999,(4).[14].[J].,1988,(8).[15].[J].,1957,(11).[16][J].,1981,(6).[17].[M].:,1998.[18][N].,1951-09-05(2).[19].[A]..[C].:,2004.[20].[A].:51[C].,2005.[21][].[M]..:,1989.[22].[M].:,2007.[23].[M].:,2007.[:]PerformanceEvaluationinCourtsofChina:TheLogicofIsomorphismandDual-trackandRelevantProblemsAIJia-hui(GuanghuaSchoolofManagement,PekingUniversity,Beijing,100871)Abstract:ThisessayanalyzesperformanceevaluationincourtsinChinabysamplestoconcludedigitizedmanagement,isomorphismanddual-tracksystemasitsnature.Itdemonstratesthereasonandjustificationofsuchsystem,andpointoutischaracteristicsofpathdependenceofnewandoldjudicialsystem.Withtheaidofjudicialtheories,informationeconomicsandtheoryofmotivation,theauthorprovesthedual-tracksystemhingesthecomparisonofjudicialsystemandunderminesjudicialindependence.Therefore,bywayofdiscre2tionofjudges,itdoesntmakesensetoevaluatejudgesinanisomorphismandmanagementdisregardthedifferencesofdivisionoflaborindifferentlevelofcourts.Theevaluationsystemmaydestroytheprinciplesof