2013高考英语二轮复习写作专题第二部分经典名句句式汇总逻辑问题分析论证句式精品教案

-1-高考英语作文经典名句与句式汇总逻辑问题分析论证句式Themerefactthatticketsalesinrecentyearsforscreenplay-basedmovieshaveexceededthoseforbook-basedmoviesisinsufficientevidencetoconcludethatwritingscreenplaysnowprovidesgreaterfinancialopportunityforwriters.Itispossiblethatfeespaidbymoviestudiosforscreenplayswilldecreaseinthefuturerelativetothoseforbookrights.Theargumentfailstoruleoutthepossibilitythatawriterengageinbothtypesofwritingaswellasothertypes.Inanyevent,theadvertisementprovidesnojustificationforthemutuallyexclusivechoicethatitimposesonthewriter.Theargumentsimplyequatessuccesswithmovieticketsales,whichisunwarranted.Theauthorassumesthatphysicalcapabilitiesaretheonlyattributesnecessarytooperateamotorvehicle.Moreover,theauthorprovidesnoevidencethattherealismofcolorphotographyisthereasonforitspredominance.Thisassumptionpresentsafalsedilemma,sincethetwomediaarenotnecessarilymutuallyexclusivealternatives.Commonsensetellsusthataphotographercansucceedbyworkinginbothmedia.Theargumentignoresthefactors-suchasinitiative,creativity,technicalskills,andbusinessjudgment-thatmaybemoreimportantthanthechoiceofmediumindeterminingsuccessinphotography.ThemajorproblemwiththeargumentisthatthestatedsimilaritiesbetweenCompanyAandBareinsufficienttosupporttheconclusionthatCompanyAwillsufferafatesimilartoCompanyB's.Consequently,themerefactthatCompanyAholdsalargeshareofthevideo-gamehardwareandsoftwaremarketdoesnotsupporttheclaimthatCompanyAwillalsofail.Thus,theauthorunfairlyassumesthathighly-ratedpublictelevisionprogramsarenecessarilywidelyviewed,orpopular.Whilethismaybetrueinsomecases,itisequallypossiblethatonlycompanieswithproductsthatarealreadybest-sellerscanaffordthehigheradratesthatpopularshowsdemand.Admittedly,thevicepresident'sreasoninglinkingemployeebenefitswithcompanyprofitsseemsreasonableonthesurface.Onecaninferfromthesurvey'sresultsthatafullone-thirdoftherespondentsmayhaveviewedthecurrentbenefitspackageunfavorably.Lackingmorespecificinformationabouthowtheseotheremployeesresponded,itisimpossibletoassessthereliabilityofthesurvey'sresultsortomakeaninformedrecommendation.-2-Itisunlikelythatthebriefone-weekperiodsundercomparisonarerepresentativeoflongertimeperiods.Ifso,eventhough3percentmoreaccidentsoccurredafterthechange,theauthor'sargumentthatchangingthespeedlimitincreasesdangerfordriverswouldbeseriouslyweakened.TheeditorialfailstotakeintoaccountpossibledifferencesbetweenEastandWestCambriathatarerelevanttohowdriversreacttospeed-limitchanges.Inaddition,whileitistruethatmanyvoterschangetheirmindsseveraltimesbeforevoting,andthatsomeremainundecideduntilenteringthevotingbooth,thisisnottrueofeveryone.Withoutknowingtheextentandnatureofthedamageresultingfromthebadpublicityorthereasonfortheviolation,wecannotaccepttheauthor'sconclusion.Theauthor'sproposalisinconsistentwiththeauthor'sconclusionabouttheconsequencesofadoptinganethicscode.Tobeginwith,theauthorfailstoconsiderhealththreatsposedbyincineratingtrash.Theauthor'sconclusionthatswitchingtoincinerationwouldbemoresalutaryforpublichealthwouldbeseriouslyundermined.However,thisisnotnecessarilythecase.Theauthor'simplicitclaimthatincineratorsareeconomicallyadvantageoustolandfillsispoorlysupported.Consequently,unlesstheauthorcandemonstratethatthecitywillincurexpensesthatarenotcoveredbytheincreasedrevenuesfromtheseprojects,theauthor'sconcernabouttheseissuesisunfounded.Firstofall,whileassertingthatrealincomesarerising,theauthorprovidesnoevidencetosupportthisassertion.Butnoevidenceisprovidedtoshowthatthisexplanationiscorrect.Moreover,theauthorfailstoconsiderandruleoutotherfactorsthatmightaccountforproportionaldecreasesinspendingonfood.Theauthorignoresotherlikelybenefitsofagriculturaltechnologythataffectfoodpiecesonlyindirectlyornotatall.Inthefirstplace,agreatdealofempiricalevidenceshowsthatsequelsareoftennotasprofitableastheoriginalmovie.However,unlesstheoriginalcastandproductionteamareinvolvedinmakingthesequel,thereisagoodchanceitwillnotbefinanciallysuccessful.Sincethedifficultiesinherentinthisprocessmakeithardtopredictwhethertheresultwillbeasuccessorafailure,theconclusionthatthesequelwillbeprofitableispresumptuous(武断的)Thisassumptionoverlooksothercriteriafordeterminingabridge'simportance-suchasthenumberofcommutersusingthebridge,theroleofthebridgeinlocalemergenciesanddisasters,andtheimpactthatbridgeclosurewouldhaveontheeconomiesofnearbycities.Withoutsuchevidence,wecannotaccepttheauthor'sconclusionthatnogovernmentfundsshouldbedirectedtowardmaintainingtheStyxRiverbridge.-3-Thefactthatthenearbycityhasaweakeningeconomydoesnotprovethatthecitywillnotcontributesignificantlytotaxrevenues.Substantiatingthisassumptionrequiresexaminingtheproperdutyofgovernment.Accordingly,thisassumptionissimplyanunprovenclaim.Theauthorispresentingafalsedilemmabyimposinganeither-orchoicebetweentwocoursesofactionthatneednotbemutuallyexclusive.Itisequallypossiblethatlegislatorscanaddressbothareasofconcernconcurrently.Theargumentreliesontheassumptionthatthelegislatorsinquestion(所讨论的)havetheopportunitytoaddressurbancrimeproblems.Finally,theautho