PPAP第四版(英文版)

PRODUCTIONPARTAPPROVALPROCESS(PPAP)ProductionPartApprovalProcess(PPAP)FirstEditionIssuedFebruary,1993SecondEdition,1stPrinting,February,1995,2ndPrinting,July,1995ThirdEdition,September,1999Copyright©1993,©1995,©1997,©1999DaimlerChryslerCorporation,FordMotorCompany,GeneralMotorsCorporation(PPAP)FirstEditionIssuedFebruary,1993SecondEdition,1stPrinting,February,1995,2ndPrinting,July,1995ThirdEdition,September,1999Copyright©1993,©1995,©1997,©1999DaimlerChryslerCorporation,FordMotorCompany,GeneralMotorsCorporationTheSecondEdition,2ndPrinting,July,1995editionisobsoleteFebruary1,2000unlessotherwisespecifiedbyyourcustomerFurthercopiesareobtainablefromAIAGat01-248-358-3003orCarwinContinuous(UK)inEurope44-1-708-861333(PPAP)ThirdEditionwasissuedtoincorporateanumberofrevisionswhichinclude:•Useof“auditable”languageandaformatconsistentwithQS-9000tosupportthirdpartyauditing;•AreorderingofthePPAPrequirementsalignedwiththetypicalprocessflow;•Revisionof“PreliminaryProcessCapabilityRequirements”,nowcalled“InitialProcessStudies”,toprovidefortheuseofeitherCpkorPpk,dependingontheamountandtypeofdataavailable,consistentwithourStatisticalProcessControlreferencemanual;•Clarificationofwhencustomernotificationand/orsubmissionisrequired;•ThepriorIASGQS-9000SanctionedInterpretationsspecifictoPPAP;•ATruckOEM-SpecificInstructions;•Requirementsforbulkmaterial,includingaBulkMaterial-SpecificAppendix;•TireIndustry-SpecificAppendix;•Anenhancedglossaryofterms.TheactualchangesofthepreviousPPAPtextareminimal,andevolutionary.Whiletheadditionshaveincreasedthesizeofthedocument,theyprovidegreaterclarificationofPPAPrequirementsandallowapplicationofPPAPrequirementstoabroadercommunityofusers.CurrenttrainingmodulessanctionedbyDaimlerChrysler,FordandGeneralMotorshavebeenrevisedtoincorporatethesechanges.AcknowledgmentsareduetotheDaimlerChrysler,FordandGMSupplierQualityRequirementsTaskForce(HankGryn,DanReidandSteveWalsh),MichaelSchonsfromDaimlerChrysler,CarolMyersandRudyPomperfromGeneralMotors,PaulNorkeviciusfromFord,PatriciaMessengerfromtheChemicalManufacturersAssociation,JosephMuscederefromtheAIAGTruckandHeavyEquipmentGroup,andSteveButcherfromtheRubberManufacturersAssociation.ThePPAPThirdEditionobsoletestheSecondEditioneffectiveFebruary1,2000unlessotherwisespecifiedbyyourcustomer.September,1999i(PPAP)procedure.ItrepresentsarefinementoftheoriginalPPAPprocedurebasedoninputfromrepresentativesateachofthesecompanies.Inparticular,itincludesrecommendationsbythecompanies’EuropeanaffiliatesthatwillfacilitateimplementationofPPAPandQS-9000inEurope.ThesecondeditionofPPAP,February1995,doesnotrevisetheproductionpartsapprovalprocess.AchangesummaryhasbeenprovidedasAppendixE.DocumentcontrolrequirementsmandatethattheFebruary,1993,editionofPPAPisobsoleteeffectiveSeptember1,1995.Whilethisprocedureisintendedtocoverallsituationsnormallyoccurringduringthepartapprovalprocess,theremaybequestionsthatariseduringimplementation.Thesequestionsshouldbedirectedtoyourcustomer’spartapprovalactivity.Ifyouareuncertainhowtocontactthepartsapprovalactivity,thebuyerinyourcustomer’sPurchasingactivitycanassistyou.AsanaidtosuppliersinimplementingPPAP,alloftheformsrequiredbytheprocedureareavailableondisketteandpermitentryofallnecessarydata.DiskettesareavailablefromAIAGat(248)358-3003.Pleasenotethecustomer-specificinformationinAppendicesB,C,andD.Theseappendicesclarifyeachcustomer’sindividualrequirements.ThePPAPdocumentrepresentstheeffortsoftheChrysler,FordandGeneralMotorssubcommitteemembers,B.RayDaughertyandRobertPanczyk(Chrysler),StephenWalsh(Ford),andTimothyO’BrienandDennisWhitman(GeneralMotors).Thesubcommitteegratefullyacknowledgesthecontributionsofmanyemployeesintheirrespectivecompanies,withoutwhoseassistanceandcontinuingsupporttheprocedurecouldnotbeeffectivelyimplemented.iii(ASQC)andtheAutomotiveIndustryActionGroup(AIAG).TheASQC/AIAGTaskForcecharteristostandardizethereferencemanuals,procedures,reportingfor-mats,andtechnicalnomenclatureusedbyChrysler,Ford,andGeneralMotorsintheirrespectivesupplierqualitysystems.Accordingly,thisProcedureshouldbeusedbysuppliersinthesubmissionofproductionpartsforapprovaltoanyofthesecompanies.Inthepast,Chrysler,Ford,andGeneralMotorseachhadtheirownproceduresforreviewingsuppliersub-missionsofproductionpartsforcustomerapproval(initialsamples).Differencesbetweenthesethreeprocessesresultedinadditionaldemandsonsupplierresources.Toimproveuponthissituation,Chrysler,Ford,andGeneralMotorsagreedtodevelop,and,throughAIAG,distributethisProcedure.TheworkgroupresponsiblefortheProcedur