论知识产权滥用行为的反垄断法规制

华中科技大学硕士学位论文论知识产权滥用行为的反垄断法规制姓名：郝珺申请学位级别：硕士专业：经济法指导教师：彭礼堂20061104IIIAbstractIntellectualPropertyrightisalegitimatemonopoly.Generallyspeaking,IntellectualPropertypossiblymakestheproprietorholdadominantmarketposition,someproprietorofIntellectualPropertyrightabusethedominantmarketpositionforbenefit.Asweknow,antimonopolylaw'spurposeistoprotectcompetition,soanticompetitiveactswillbepublishedbyantimonopolylaw.BasedontheanalysisandappraisementofthetheoriesofIntellectualPropertyandantimonopolylaw,fromtheperspectivesofeconomicsandlaw.ThispaperdiscussestheinteractionbetweenIntellectualPropertyandantimonopolylaw,withthefocusbeingonstudyingonantimonopolyissuesofIntellectualPropertyrights.Themaindiscussionisdividedintofourparts.Inchapter1IintroducetheimprovementoftheLegalsystemofIntellectualProperty.andsoon.Inchapter2,IdiscussthedefinitionofabuseofIntellectualPropertyRight.Utilizingintellectualtheoryandpropertyrighttheory,IdiscussthetheoryofIntellectualProperty.Inchapter3,IstudyontheantimonopolyissuesofabuseofIntellectualPropertyright,concentratingontherestrictionofantimonopolylaw.IexpoundtherelationbetweenIntellectualPropertyandantimonopolylaw.Iresearchtoabuseofadominantposition,whichisatopicalactofabuseofIntellectualProperty.Then,IexaminethelegitimateactofIntellectualPropertyandabuseofIntellectualProperty.Besides,Iintroducelegalrulesoncontrollingmergers.Inchapter4,IdescribeChina'slegislationonantimonopolyintherealmofIntellectualProperty.IintroducethepresentsituationandthesignificationofantimonopolyissuestobebroughtforwardinChina.KeyWords:AbuseofIntellectualPropertyrightsMonopolyAntimonopolyAntimonopolylaw□_____□“√”1,,,.211.1“”1919“”1.1.1“exclusive”“monopoly”“”“”[1]“”“3”[2]“”[3]“”“”[4]“”[5]“”“”1.1.24“”()()“”[6]“”[7][8]402“”[9]“”[10]51.2——“”[11]“”[12]Trips7“”WCTWPPT“6”123[13]“‘’——”[14]7822.12.1.1“”“”1“”2“”3“”“”“”——92.1.2“”[15]·[16]10“”“”[17]11“”[18]“”“”——[19]“12…123”[20]“”[21]132.2“”“”“”“”“”“”[22]14·“”[23]15,1633.13.1.1[24]()173.1.2“”()1819“”3.1.320,[25]“21”[26]3.23.2.13.2.1.1WINDOWSWINDOWS100“”“”221[27][28]WindowsIntel“WinTel”””232[29][30][31]IEIEIE24[32]3.2.1.2329253.2.23.2.2.1“”199546[33]26“”[34]3.2.2.2[35]273.2.2.323“”2345[36]2844.1294.2SC30WTO[37][38]4.331WTOWTOGATT199413;WTOWTO32333435[1]..1.,1997.8[2],..1.,199612.3[3],,..1.,19961.8[4]..1.,19959.11[5],,..1.,19946.255[6]..,2005,2[7]..,1996,1[8]...1996,4[9]·..,1990,2[10][]·.——.,.,1987.296[11]..,2004,1.6263[12]R·Pound,Jurisprudence,WestPublishing,1959,Vol.3,p.16...1.,199612,124126[13],..,1997,4[14]...,2003,6[15]·,·...,199136.136[16][]·..1..,19998.146[17]·,·...,1991.185[18]KeithE.Maskus.IntellectualPropertyRightsintheGlobalEconomy,InstituteforInternationalEconomics,Washington,DC,August2000[19]..1.,1999.38[20]·,·...,1991.137[21],..1.,200210.37[22]PeterDrahos,APhilosophyofIntellectualProperty,DarmouthPublishingCompanyLimited,1996,pp.7582[23][]·.——.,.,1987.296297[24]WilliamC.Holmes.IntellectualPropertyandAntitrustlawCompany.Ltd1996.pp7576[25].,=154.2006828[26]..,2002,2[27].——.[28]..().2003,137[29],...2000,3[30],..,2001,3[31]..,2001,2[32]..,2000,8[33]..,1998,2[34]..,1998,2[35],.—.,2000,2[36]..,2002,2[37]...1999,2[38]...1999,93839:[1]..:,1998[2]..:,2001[3]..:,1999[4]..1.:,20053[5]..1.:,2004[6],.(3).:,2004[7]..1.:,20053[8]..1.:,20051[9]..1.:,199612[10]·,·...:,1991[11][]·A·...:,1997[12][]·.——.,.:,1987[13]..:,2004[14].——.1.:,2001[15].WTO.1.:,20011[16]..1.:,2002[17],..1.:,20024010[18]..1.:,20033[19],..2.:,20056:[1]..,2005,2[2]..,1996,4[3].——.,20057,8[4]..,2004,1[5].:.,2003,6[6]..,2000,1[7]..,2005,6[8].——“”.,2005,10[9]..,2001,2[10],..,2001,2[11]..,2002,2[12],...2000,3[13]..(),20033[14]...2001,6[15]...1994,4[16],..,2002,241[17].——.,2003,12[18]..,2001,4[19]..,1999,6[20]..,2000,8[21].——.,2002,3[22],..,2001,3[23],..,1995,4[24],.WTO:.,2002,2[25]..,1996,6[26],.——.,2000,2[27]..,1997,11[28].Trips.,2002,2[29]..(),2004,1[30]..,200012173[31],..,2001,3[32].WTO.,2001,5[33]..=126&c_upid=7&c_grade=2&a_id=7389,20061015[34].——.[35].,=154,2006828:[1]RogerAJackson.TensionbetweenAnti-trustandIntellectualProperty,1997[2]Meiners&Staaf.Patents,CopyrightandTrademarks:PropertyorMonopoly,HarvardJournalofLaw&Public,vol.13.1990,[3]PiereLeval.TowardaFairUseStandard.HarwardLawReview,Vol.103.1990,[4]TinaHart,LindaFezzani.IntellectualPropertyLaw.Landon:MacmillanPressLtd.,1997.[5]AdamMoore.ALockeanTheoryofIntellectualProperty.21HemlineLawReview.1997[6]WilliamLandes,RichardPosner.AnEconomicAnalysisofCopyrightLaw,LawandEconomics.1987.[7]ThomasSullivan.TheConfluencebetweenAntitrustandIntellectualProperty.MinnesotaIntellectualPropertyReview.Volume1[8]RobertPitofsky.AntitrustandIntellectualProperty:UnresolvedIssuesattheHeartoftheNewEconomy.March2,2001.:[9]RobertPitofsky.ChallengesoftheNewEconomy:IssuesattheIntersectionofAntitrustandIntellectualProperty.June15,2001.:[10]Kei