您好,欢迎访问三七文档
当前位置:首页 > 商业/管理/HR > 质量控制/管理 > 六西格玛项目模板-英文
六西格玛优质项目:ReduceTMOVsurfacecontamination2018.12.5D-stagecatalogueContinuouslyImprovingCMAIDD-1BackgroundD-2ProjectTargetD-3ProjectTeamD-4ProjectScheduleDMAICD-1BackgroundDMAICCurrentSituation1.ThesurfacecontaminationissueistheoneofthetopthreerejectedbyFQAsampling,FQArejected23lotsin2017.2.ThereisasurfacecontaminationcustomercomplaininJanuary2018.D-2ProjectTargetBaselineTargetCurrentsituationDMAICRejectedlots:23Rejectedlots:15D-4ProjectScheduleDMAIC2018ItemPhaseWK14WK15WK16WK17WK18WK19WK20WK21WK221Define2Measure3Analyze4Improve5Control6ProjectreviewD-5VoiceofCustomerDMAIC$66,676.76,20.11%1.TestandPrint2.Visualoperator3.FQAInternalCustomerAllMOVEndCustomerExternalCustomer1.Improvecustomersatisfaction2.BetterQuality3.Fasterreactionspeed4.DeliveryEfficiencyExternalVOCInternalVOC1.Lowerscrapcost2.Higherproductivity3.BetterQuality4.BetterImproveSalaryM-stageCatalogue$66,676.76,20.11%DMAICContinuouslyImprovingCMAIDM-1ProcessFlowChartM-2PlatoChartofDefectsM-3MSA-3AM-1ProcessFlowChartDMAIC$66,676.76,20.11%CuringCoatingKeyProcessLaserMarkingAssemblyVisualcheckPackingFQAsamplingElectricalTestSemifinishedappearanceStorageShippingM-2Thescrappageof14DsurfacecontaminationtendencychartDMAIC2017年12月2018年1月2018年2月平均系列10.49%0.57%0.52%0.53%0.49%0.57%0.52%0.53%0.44%0.46%0.48%0.50%0.52%0.54%0.56%0.58%Thescrappageof14DsurfacecontaminationtendencychartM-3MSA-3AbeforetrainingDMAICPartNoTMOVseriesPartNameTMOVseriesSpecifications:ReferencevisualstandardOperator1ZhangRuixiaOperator2LiuJianxueOperator3DengChaolianOperator4LuChunlanTrials2timesM-3MSA-3AbeforetrainingDMAIC432110090807060AppraiserPercent95.0%CIPercent432110090807060AppraiserPercent95.0%CIPercentDateofstudy:Reportedby:Nameofproduct:Misc:AssessmentAgreementWithinAppraisersAppraiservsStandardM-3MSA-3AbeforetrainingDMAIC决定测量系统Kappa值有效性错误率错误警报率评价人可接受的条件大于等于0.75≥80%0≤10%Operator10.4475020.7%Operator20.4677020.7%Operator30.168030.1%Operator40.1668028.3%3Aconclusion:Alloperatorarefailingforthe3AtestbeforetrainingDMAICA-1FishbonediagramanalysisA-2CategoryratioofsurfacecontaminationA-3SurfacecontaminationanalysisContinuouslyImprovingCMAIDA-stageCatalogA-1FishboneDiagramAnalysisSurfaceContaminationAnalysisDMAICncontaminatiosurfaceEnvironmentMeasurementsMethodsMaterialMachinesPersonnelmachineintimetheencapsulationOperatordonotclearbeendamagedSteel-WireScreenhasmachineisnotsharpThecutterofthe3in1PapertapeisfragilemachineiswrongencapsulatingThewaytocleanthestandardinspectionisnotTheprocessofvisualmethodisnotaccurateThemeasurementmisjudgmentVisualinspectionCause-and-EffectDiagramA-2Categoryratioofsurfacecontamination240pcsofproductswererandomlyselectedforstatisticalanalysisDMAICPaperbattingMisjudgmentothers数量143532024占比59.58%22.08%8.33%10.00%14353202459.58%22.08%8.33%10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%020406080100120140160Categoryratioofsurfacecontamination数量占比A-3SurfacecontaminationanalysisPaperanalysisDMAICThesourceofthepaperscrapsisthepapertape.A-3SurfacecontaminationanalysisPaperanalysisDMAICFactorLevelResponsePaperScrapCutterpressureDryingagentTargetAslittleaspossibleCuttershape5.5kPA7.5kPAYesNoStraightArcA-3SurfacecontaminationanalysisDOEdatacollectionDMAICStdOrderRunOrderCenterPtBlocksPressuedryingagentshapedefect6111highnostraight215211lownostraight323311lowyesarc747411lowyesstraight294511highyesarc618611highyesstraight191711lownoarc902811highnoarc63A-3SurfacecontaminationanalysisPaperanalysisDMAICCodedCoefficientsTermEffectCoefSECoefT-ValueP-ValueVIFConstant48.631.7128.400.000Pressue-15.25-7.631.71-4.450.0211.00dryingagent-5.75-2.871.71-1.680.1921.00shape-46.75-23.371.71-13.650.0011.00Pressue*shape4.752.371.711.390.2601.00RegressionEquationinUncodedUnitsdefect=48.63-7.63Pressue-2.87dryingagent-23.37shape+2.37Pressue*shapeConclusion:Theexperimentofaffectingpaperscrap,wecanknowthattheshapeandpressurearethesignificantfactor(P0.05),A-3SurfacecontaminationanalysisResponseOptimization:defectDMAICResponseOptimization:defectParametersResponseGoalLowerTargetUpperWeightImportancedefectMinimum199011SolutiondryingdefectCompositeSolutionPressueagentshapeFitDesirability1highyesstraight191MultipleResponsePredictionVariableSettingPressuehighdryingagentyesshapestraightSE95%95%ResponseFitFitCIPIdefect19.00*(*,*)(*,*)Conclusion:Inordertoachievetheexperimentalgoal,theanalysisbyResponseOptimizershows:Cutterpressurecanbesetat7.5kPa.StraightCutteristhebestforthisexperiment.Steel-WireScreenanalysisDMAIC1.Theoperatorcleansthemachineandthecontaminantwillfallintoencapsulationtank.2.TheSteel-WireScreenhasbeendamaged,thecontaminantcanthroughthesteel-wirescreenduringscreeningwork.3.TheSteel-WireScreenistoodenseandinconvenienttouse.A-3SurfacecontaminationanalysisDMAICA-3surfacecontaminationone-wayANOVA单因子方差分析Y:SurfacecontaminationrateX2:Steel-WireScreenmeshnumberHo假设:ThemeshnumberhasnoeffectonthesurfacecontaminationrateHa假设:ThemeshnumberhaseffectonthesurfacecontaminationratePurpose:DeterminewhetherThemeshnumberhasaneffectonthesurfacecontaminationratemeshnumber1234600.0050.00530.00570.005480
本文标题:六西格玛项目模板-英文
链接地址:https://www.777doc.com/doc-4451760 .html