您好,欢迎访问三七文档
当前位置:首页 > 临时分类 > 论机动车交通损害赔偿中的过失相抵
烟台大学硕士学位论文论机动车交通损害赔偿中的过失相抵姓名:江成世申请学位级别:硕士专业:民商法学指导教师:张平华2011-03-12I,761312620032II:IIIAbstractContributorynegligenceisthevictimforcausingthedamageordamagetotheexpansionoftheresultsofafault,canlegallyreduceoravoidtheobligationofreparationfordamageliabilitysystem.Inthemotorvehicleroadtrafficaccidentvictimsiscommoninfault,contributorynegligencedamagesroadtrafficrulesapplytonotonlyprotecttheinterestsofthevictim,butalsoembodiesthespiritoffairnessandjusticeoflaw.China'sRoadTrafficSafetyLawArticle76,CivilLawSection131,TortLiabilityActarticle26ofthe2003SupremeCourttohearcasesofpersonalinjurycompensationproblemsinthelaw'sinterpretationofArticle2clearthecontributorynegligenceprovisionsofthesystemappliedincivillaw.Buttherequirementsaresimple.Asforhowtheruleofdamagesinroadtrafficforthelackofcorrespondingprovisionsintheresultofjudicialdecisionsincasessimilartothepracticeareverydifferent,thisisextremelyunfavorabletothelawapplicabletotheunity.Thisarticleonhowtodamagesinmotorvehicletrafficrulesapplicabletocontributorynegligence,mainlythefollowingfouraspectswerediscussed,inordertoroadtrafficinjuryintheapplicationoftherulesofjudicialpracticetoprovidesometheoreticalsupport.ThefirstpartisapplicableinvehicledamagesEssentialElementsofNegligence.Fromthevictimside,hasfourmainaspectsoftheconstituentelements:thevictimtobeatfault,thevictim'sconduct,thecommonoccurrenceofthedamageorthecauseofexpansion,thevictimhastheabilitytocontributorynegligence,thevictim'sbehaviormustbeinappropriate.ThesecondpartisapplicableinvehicledamagesComparativeAnalysisofcontributorynegligence.Statetrafficlawsbythetwolegalsystemsinthevehiclefordamagesforcontributorynegligenceruleappliesintheanalysisandcomparisonofthesimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthem.Thencombinedwithcontributorynegligenceoflawrulesfortheapplicationofestablishedlaw,ChinashouldlearnfromtheJapanesepracticeofcontributorynegligenceinamotorvehicleshalldamagesberefinedinthecriteria,typeof.Thethirdpartisthevehiclefordamagesinthescopeofcontributorynegligencerule.Contributorynegligencerulediffersfromtheapplicationofliabilitywithoutfaultforthefaultliability,liabilitywithoutfaultintheapplicationsubjecttocertainrestrictions.Closelyrelatedtothethirdpersonandthevictimshouldbeconsideredthefaultofthevictim'sfaultforNegligence.Thethirdvictimiscloselyrelatedtothetypeofresearchshouldbeconducted.Thefourthpartisthemotorvehicleindamagesforcontributorynegligencerulemethod.Negligenceoftherulesofoperationtherearethreemainmethods:comparativefault,IVcomparativestrength,andthereasonsandcausesofthefaultcomparedwiththeintegratedforce.DamagesinthemotorvehicleforNegligenceinthefaultandcausesthemainpowershouldbecomparedwiththecombinationtype.Finally,inthecaseofcontributorynegligenceinvehicledamagestheapplicationofrulesforempiricalanalysis.Keywordcontributorynegligence,no-faultliability,negligence,trafficaccident12009238351677592751259.12008265204734843049191012007327209816493804421220077676(2)(3)20032801998397200561996564200460219972121220%1998398400911=1176698902010-09-10200460513200179200615WilliamL.prosser,HandbookofthelawofTorts,St.paul,WestPub.co.,1971,p3162007214321010201042010-8-25=27598201042010-8-25=2759815161.1875(1)167080%(32)(33)(2)1(31)(33)(3)(51)(4)(4)(5)(6)2007216199225720061718752201952792541254119181020027828210103.722264,2005,3092007120062331919939:18:27:36:419972152007120053602006202002239200930202019101920461945ThelawreformcontributorynegligenceAct194519501997171WilliamBurnham2003236211980815()4441981410()341198613120031226213120092620032()2003243()2003371-622222007767676176262376261985Badinter2676121985Badinter21200142010-5-20=22591242512[]20016572631384208013841011121990273421720032200562002129271063761201011,,,710:10,101063200872008102006160-162281070220032320063119885722006382922242005276302781722426277222217123200319972202005453120038932333419964013520%80%50%30%70%51%50%2005620066200522005236254101120052200126937762008112370801998343-3442005306382004592055EN52762004521200559-602010-7-5,[1]2006[2]2001[3]2010[4]2004[5]2004[6]2001[7]1997[8]2005[9]2005[10]2000[11]2008[12]1999[13[]():2001[14][]2001[15]2007[16]1998[17]1998[18]1988[19]2005[20]1980[21]2005[22]2004[23]2000[24]2006[25]2006[26][]1987[27]22003[28]199944[29]1998[30]2000[1]2009[2]2006[3]2006[4]2007[5]2008[6]2006[7]20056[8]20063[9]41998[10]20066[11]192001[12]7620083[13]20087[14]20066[15]20071[16]20076[17]200653[18]200810[19]200713211[20]20072[21]2006[22]20
本文标题:论机动车交通损害赔偿中的过失相抵
链接地址:https://www.777doc.com/doc-5194666 .html