Verbal补充至70篇-最终版

1、Communicationtechnologiesarefarfromequivalent.Arecentstudycomparinghonestyacrossarangeofdifferentmediarevealedthatpeopleweretwicelikelytotelllieswhenusingthephonethanwhencommunicatingviae-mail.Ithadpreviouslybeenassumedthatpeoplewouldbemoreinclinedtofabricatethetruthwhenusinge-mail,duetotheremotenessoftheinteractionmakingpeoplemorecomfortableaboutdeceivingothers.Onthecontrary,itseemsthatanxietyovertheaccountabilityaffordedbytherecordingofe-mailexchangesinducesgreatertruthfulness.However,theresearchalsonotedthatpeoplearemuchmorelikelytoberudeorinsultingovere-mail,outweighinganybenefitsofincreasedhonesty!Animplicationofthestudyisthatiftelephoneconversationsarerecordedandpeopleareawareofthisfact,theyarelikelytobemoretruthfuloverthephone.（T）Peopleareunconcernedabouttherepercussionofe;mailuntruths.（F）Ithadbeenassumedthatpeoplewouldcommunicatemorehonestlywhenusinge;mailthanwhenusingthetelephone.（F）2、Thereisoftenconsiderablescientificdisagreementbothaboutavailablereservesofnaturalresourcesandabouttheextentofenvironmentaldamagecausedbyparticularpollutants.Evenwherethescientificevidenceisincontrovertible.Theremaybepoliticalconflict,basedondifferentvestedinterests,overthedegreetowhichparticularenvironmentalcontrolsshouldbeaccepted.Governmentsmay,forexample,refrainfromintroducingeffectivecontroliftheyfearthesewilladverselyaffectcompanyprofitabilityorjobs,evenwheretheenvironmentalcostofnotintroducingcontrolsareconsiderable.自然资源的可用储量和特定污染物造成的环境损害程度，往往存在相当大的科学性意见。有许多科学，即使在科学证据是确凿无疑的。可能有政治冲突，根据不同的既得利益，在一定程度上，特别是环境控制上应该被接受的问题。政府可能不采取有效的控制，例如，如果他们担心这些会带来不利影响公司的盈利能力或工作，即使不引入控制的环境成本是相当大的。Thereisalwaysscientificdebatearoundthefactsregardingthereservesofnaturalresources.（T）Veryrarelyisthereconflictoverthedegreetowhichparticularenvironmentalcontrolsshouldbeaccepted.（F）Partieswithavestedinterestaremoreinfluencedbypoliticsthansciencewhendecidingwhethertoimplementenvironmentalcontrols.（C）3、Whilsthighvisibilitycrimesuchasnight-timedrunkendisturbancehasincreased,totalurbanandruralcrime,bothreportedandunreported,hasfallenoverthelasttwoyears,yetpeoplefeellesssafe,believingthattheconverseisthecase.Thisfallincrimehascoincidedwithadropinthenumberofpoliceofficeronthestreet.Acitizen’sfearofseemsnottobeamatterofrealityatall;thevisibilityoflawenforcementofficialshasagreaterimpactontheirviewofrealitythanhardfacts.同时高度引人注目的犯罪，比如夜间醉酒滋事比率上升，市区和乡镇地区，已报道和未报道的总犯罪率在过去两年内都已经下降，但人们依然感觉不安全，觉得犯罪率不降反升。犯罪率的下降恰好遇上了街道上警察数量的削减。市民的担心看来没有必要；法律的执行力和透明度对大家的观点产生的影响要比事实更重要。br削减警察的数量导致犯罪率下降Reducingthenumberofpoliceofficerhasledtoareductionincrime.（C）Crimestatisticssupportpopularbeliefaboutthelevelofcrime.（F）br犯罪统计为犯罪程度的普遍观点提供支撑数据Peoplefeelsaferwhentherearemorepoliceonthestreet.（C）4、Thereisnotaskmoredifficultthanthatofensuringtheeducationofchildreninmodern.Notonlyschool,butalsoteachersandtheirroleshavechangedoutofallrecognitioninthepastfewdecades,thankstotheimpactonteachinginstitutionsbyindoctrinating,andindoctrinated,reformistintellectualsbearingrevolutionaryideas.Totheperpetualindisciplineofyouthhasnowbeenaddedtheindisciplineofparents,manyofwhominterpretanyreportsofwrongdoinginschoolonthepartoftheiroffspringasapersonalaffront,orasthemanifestationofthemaliceofteachers.Asfortheteachersthemselves,whilstmanyarerespectableandlearnedmenandwomen,whoviewitastheirvocationtoinducttheirchargesintoacivilizationandawayofbehaving,othersattempttoinfluenceyouthmerelytofurthertheirpoliticalorideologicalends.在现代社会，没有什么任务比保证孩子的教育更困难的了。这不仅是学校，连老师的角色也已经在过去几十年内发生了认知上的巨大变化。由于在师范学院被灌输的观点所影响，改良派知识分子接受了很多变革性的理念。青少年的无纪律性现在转移到了父母的无纪律性身上，很多父母都认为老师所反映的他们孩子的过失行为是对家长的一种羞辱，或者认为是老师心怀恶意的表现。对很多受人尊敬而且博学多识的男女教师本身而言，他们觉得引导学生端正行为，言传身教是很轻松的事情，但是另外一些人却试图对学生施加影响以达到他们的政治和理想主义目的。一些教育系统的工作有自己的不成文的规则br改革派教师会试图对学生施加影响以达到他们自己的政治目的br一些报告学生行为不端的老师这样做是出于恶意而不是正当理由。Someofthoseworkingineducationhavetheirownhiddenagendas.（T）Teacherwithrevolutionaryideaswillattempttoinfluencetheirpupilsfortheirownpoliticalends.（C）Someteacherswhoreportchildrenofwrongdoingdosobecauseofmalice,ratherthannaylegitimatereason.（C）5、Lastweek,thecompetitioncommissionoutlinedtwopackagestoregulatethesaleofextendedproductwarranties,whichproviderepair/replacementforfaultygoodsbeyondthemanufacturer’soriginalguarantee.Whilstwarrantysalesarecurrentlyhighlyprofitable,withsomeretailersattributingupto.oftheirprofitstothisincomestream,theyarealsocriticizedforofferingpoorvalueformoneyduetoobscureclauses,whichrestrictpaymentinmany,butthemostunlikelyclaimscenarios.Thefirstpackage-tobanretailerssellingafullwarrantyonthedayofpurchasewascondemnedbyallasdraconian-whilsttheother,rathermilder,optionofforcingretailerstoprovidefullinformationonwarrantyexclusionsandanobligatory60–day“cool-off”periodforcustomers,receivedamorebalancedhearing.Becausenoonebelievesthatthefirstoptionwilleverbeimplemented,investorsandanalystshavefocusedmorecloselyontheimplicationofthe“milder”package.Inarecentleakedresearchnote,oneanalystsuggestedthattheimplementationofthereforminthesecondpackagewouldplaceastaff-trainingburdenontheretailer,whichwouldleadtoasignificantincreaseinthecost