【BUSL250】case-全集中英文

Busl250FinalCase1.TreveyvGrubb(1982)defendantplaintiffTherewasacontractandtheplaintiffwasentitledtoashareofthewinningsinproportiontohercontribution.2.BalfourvBalfour[1912]30Domesticarrangement.Becausetheparitiesdidnotintendthattheyshouldbeattendedbylegalconsequences.Atthetimetheagreementwasmadethecourtsdidnotconsiderthatthemarriagehadbrokendown.3.MerrittvMerritt[1970]theresumptionagainstanintentiontocreatelegalrelationsdoesnotapplywhenthepartiesareseparated.4.WakelingvRipley(1951)Therewasampleevidencetoindicatethatthepartiesdidintendtoenterintoabindingandenforceablecontractas‘theconsequencesfortheplaintiffsweresoserious..’5.TeenRanchPtyLtdvBrown[1964]BrownTherewasnoevidenceofintentiontocreatelegalrelationsbythepartiesandsonocontractofemploymentcouldbesaidtoexist.Brown’sworkwasvoluntaryandthereforehewasnotentitledtoworkers’compensation.6.Edward’svSkyways[1964]Thesubjectoftheagreementwascommercialinnatureandtherewasameetingofminds—anintention.Theairlinewasunabletoshowthatlegalrelationswerenotintended.Therewasnoevidencetoshowthatthetransactionwasintendedtobebindinginhonouronly.Onthecontrary,thewordsusedwerepromissoryinnatureandtherewasanenforceablecontractandthepilotwasentitledtotheexgratiapayment.7.JonesvVernon’sPools[1938]JonesTheclausewaseffectivetopreventanyactionbeingtakenagainstVernon’sPools,andthetransactionwas‘bindinginhonouronly’sinceitclearlystatedthatanydealingsbetweenthepartieswerenotintendedtohavelegaleffect.8.CarlillvCarbolicSmokeballCo[1893]smokeball200Thecourtrejectedthisargument.The$2000depositedatthebankclearlyevidencedanintentiontopayanyonewhoperformedtheconditionsoftheofferandwhoclaimedthemoney.9.ClarkevEarlofDunravenandMount-Earl[1897]10.PartridgevCrittenden[1968]Theadvertisementwasonlyaninvitationtotreatbecausenowherewasthereanyindicationofanexpressionofintentiontobebound.Thecasewasdismissed.11.HarrisonvNickerson[1873]NHNauctionNNTheadvertisementoftheauctionwasnotaguaranteethatitwouldbeheldbutsimplyadeclarationofintentionoraninvitationtotreatandsotherewasnocontract.12.HarveyvFacey[1893]PD“BumperHallPen?”D“900”P“900”DDThesecondtelegramwasmerelyanindicationoftheminimumpriceifthedefendantsultimatelydecidedtosell,andthethirdtelegramwasnot,therefore,anacceptancebutanoffertobuy.Thatofferwasnotacceptedandsotherewasnocontract.13.PharmaceuticalSocietyofGreatBritainvBootsCashchemists[1953]Thedisplayofgoodsonshelves,evenwithpricemarked,wasaninvitationtotreat.Theoffertookplacewhenthecustomerselectedthegoodsfromtheshelvesandtookthemtothepharmacistatthecashregister.Ifthepharmacistacceptedthemoneyofferedbythecustomerandenteredthepriceinthecashregister,acontractwasformedatthispoint.14.GoldsboroughMort&CoLtdvQuinn(1910)15.DickinsonvDodds[1876]Dodds800Dickinson,Doddsoffer“”DickinsonDoddstryofferbygivingaformalacceptanceDoddsNoacceptancehadtakenplace.Theoffereehadbecomeawareoftherevocationoftheofferfromareliablesourceandthereforetheofferhadbeenvalidlyrevoked.(theoffereemustbetoldbeforetherevocation.Iftheydon’tknow,theycanstillaccepttheoffer,it’slegalprincipal)16.HydevWrench[1840]D1200PD1000P950DP1000DPTheplaintiff’sactionsshowedthatheintendedtorejectboththedefendant’soffers,andthismeantthathewasnolongerabletorevivethembychanginghismindandmakingasubsequentacceptance.17.RamsgateVictoriaHotelCoLtdMontefiore[1866]Mshares681123PTheoffertopurchaseshareshadnotbeenacceptedwithinareasonabletimeandtheofferhadthereforelapsed.Thustherewasnocontract.18.R.vClarke(1927)CCCrewardsrewardsTheHighCourtheldthatCwasnotentitledtorecoverthereward,because,whilehewasawareofit,hehadnointentionofclaimingtherewardatthetimehecompliedwiththeoffer.Hewasintentonlyonsavinghimselffromthecharge.19.FelthousevBindley(1862)Foffer“40F”FBBFBBThenephew’sacceptancehadnotbeencommunicatedtotheuncle.Thehorsedidnotthereforebelongtohim.(silencedosenotamounttoacceptanceofanoffer)20.PowellvLee(1908)PPPPTherewasnocontract.Powell’sofferhadnotbeenacceptedastheresolutionwasnotcommunicatedbyanyonewithauthority.21.TinnvHoffman&Co(1873)22.AdamsvLindsell(1818)23.RoscorlavThomas[1842]RTTTRTTheseller’spromisewasnotbinding.Itwasmakeafterthesalehadbeencompletedandthebuyerhadgivennothinginreturnforit.Thebuyercouldn’trelyonthepriorsaletosupportthenewpromiseasitwaspastconsideration.24.AndersonvGlass[1869]GlassThepromisetopayincreasedwageswithrespecttotheworkalreadydonewasnotbindingbecauseitwaspastconsideration.TheworkhadalreadybeenperformedbyAndersonandpaidforbyGlass,andasthiswastheonlyconsiderationAndersoncouldprovide,hisclaimforthepastperiodfailed.ThepromiseoffuturewageswasenforceablebecauseAndersoncouldprovideconsiderationhere.25.LampleighvBraithwait(1615)BLLLondonBB100LLBAcontractexisted,astherequestforLservicesbyBandtheperformanceofthoseservices,coupledwithasubsequentpromisetopay,wereallpartofthesametransaction.26.DunlopPneumaticTyreCovSelfridge&Co[1915]27.CoullsvBagot’sExecutorandTrusteeCo(1967)TheHighCourtheldthatwhileconsiderationmustmovefromthepromisee,wherethepromiseismadetopromiseesjointly,considerationneedonlymovefromthemforthepromisetobeenforceable.Thus,she