中外档案开放利用中的法律问题之比较研究

湘潭大学硕士学位论文中外档案开放利用中的法律问题之比较研究姓名：舒任颖申请学位级别：硕士专业：图书馆学指导教师：肖文建20070508IIIABSTRACTTheultimateaimofthearchivesistocultivateandutilizethearchivesinformationresourcestoserveallaspectsofthesociety.Butintheprocessofopeningandutilizingarchivesinformation,variouslegalissueswillbeconcerned.Toinvestigatetheselegalissuesistheco-responsibilityofthescholarsinarchivesandlaw.Sincethelawofarchivesbeingissuedforovertwodecades,they’veimprovedmuch.Buttheworkofopeningandutilizationarenotasgoodasothercountriesinmanyaspects,itisbecauseoftheincompleteofChineselawandregulations.Thedissertationisdividedintothreepartstodiscussthedifferences'andsimilaritiesinthelegalissuesofarchivesopeningandutilizationinChinaandotherforeigncountries.ThefirstpartisthecomparisonoflawinarchivesopeninginChinaandforeigncountries.Itdescribestheconnotationandmeaningoftheopeningfirst,andthencomparesthehistoricalbackgroundandaim,legalpolicy,mainbody,startingtime,andrangeandcontentoftheopeningofarchives.Finally,accountsthedifferencesandsimilaritiesoftheprotectionoftherighttoknowthearchivesinformationintheopeningofarchives.ThesecondisthecomparisonoflawinarchivesutilizationandpublishinChinaandforeigncountries.Itdescribesthedefinitionandmeaningoftheutilizationofarchivesfirstly,andthencomparesthelegalprocedure,utilizationfee,andthelegalprotectionofcitizenarchivesutilizationright.Finally,itisthedifferencesandsimilaritiesinthelegalissuesofarchivespublishinChinaandforeigncountries.AndthethirdpartisthecomparisonoftheprotectionofcivilrightsinthearchivesopeningandutilizationinChinaandforeigncountries.Intheprocessofopeningandutilizationofarchives,therightofprivacyandcopyrightofthecitizenisthecriticalpointofcivilrightsprotection.ThischaptercomparestheregulationsoftherightofprivacyandcopyrightinthelawandregulationsinandoutofChinarespectively.Keywords:archives;opening;utilization;publish;legalissues;comparison11.120061.21.31979-2006139971113082SpringLink&Kluwer271442121.41.532.12.1.1[1][2]42.1.2[3],WTOWTO52.2202001200430%29.1%29%27.7%4.2%3.7%3.8%4.6%[4]60%[5]90%2.2.1[6]179019342050[7]1966619805192119492.2.2196690%[8]2006630[9]19926193088-119918197[10]1.WTO2.2.2.3[11]2.2.4825196893030[12]258080[13]2030[8]302550703010019793060100150[14]93019491013019689303030302.2.512345106[15]1991927101()23456789101974112.32.3.1rightofinforming2020[16][17]4180%[18]2.3.212179019351966197419861996135,20041949196630%80%[19]2.3.32200431433[20]WTO14153.13.1.1[21][22]3.1.21.162.3.WTO12271956700[23]3.22005200120044.2%3.7%3.8%4.6%60%3.2.117123()1620163[8]18[24]163[14]1820[25]3.2.211226192213945562.3525[25]10020011[26][27]203.2.3[28][29]200[30]20000[31]1966[32]92190%10%:20044221[33]3.33.3.122199955232212345673.3.21[34]2323W[24]244.1[35]123[35]4.1.1[36]25[37]12345[38]123456[39]4.1.226[40]51232[22]4.24.2.1:271()802801001503450100570100678100120150910[41]19701979133015012010060[41]281993790[42]70307550[43]4.2.22124[44]716293174.2.321[45]30[46]1,,[47]23199223023160-70[47]4.34.3.1171032201710212818427421956501995701909282819765019977019252519281519732550[48]33[49]1976[50]67812[50]12[62]4.3.2209015034199092001102002819493030199020011123112312123119451995199320431231199519951231213:12313199115:1231352221()()4.3.326362001144.3.421373839[1].“”[J].2005(5):16-19.[2].[M].2002:216.[3].[J].2005(2):4-8.[4].2005[J].:,2005:759.[5].[J].2004(2):11-14.[6],.[J].2003(3):34-35.[7].[J].1994(3):61-64.[8],.[J].2002(9):38-39.[9].[J].2006(8):57.[10].[J].2006(10):13-15.[11].[12].[M].:2002:222.[13],.[M].:1998:195.[14].[J].2003(6):23-24.[15],.[J].2004(2):10-11.[16].[J].2005(5):125-128.[17].[J].2005(6):10-11.[18],..“”,2007-5-6.[19].[J].200410:25-26.[20].[M].:1999:170.[21].[D].:2004:1934.[22].[M].1996:18.[23].[J].1996:():83-84.[24]·.——[J].1995(7):37-38.[25].[M].:1998:214-218.[26].——[J].2001(3):24-26.40[27]·W·.[J].1997(2):12-14.[28]T.R.Schellenberg.ModernArchivesPrinciplesandTechniques[J].TheUniversityofChicagoPress.1975.4-5[29]Ernst.Posner.SomeAspectsofArchivalDevelopmentSinceTheFrenchRevolution[J].TheAmericanArchivist.1940(Vol.3):161-162[30].[J].2006(3):43-45.[31].[J].2002(3):5-6.[32].——“”[J].2004(2):37-40.[33].[J]2003(1):7-8.[34].[J].2005(2):62-64.[35].[M].:1999:226.[36].[M].:2003:40.[37].[J]2005(1):9-10.[38],.[J].1993(9):27-29.[39],.[J].2006(6):51-54.[40].[M].:2003:1.[41].[M].1985265.[42].[J].20024:20-21.[43].[J].20057:30-31.[44].[J].20063:29-31.[45].[J].20036:11-13.[46].[J].20036:4-6.[47].[J].20011:21-24.[48].[M].20039593.[49].[M].200593.[50].[M]1991182193.41[1].[J].19955:49-51.[2].[J].20066:48-50.[3].[M].:2000:100.[4].[M].:2002:20.[5].[M].:1999226.[6].[J].20021:21-22.[7].[J].20022:22-23.[8].[M].1998219.[9].[J].20036:18-20.[10].[J].20041:37-40.[11].[J].20056:118-120.[12].[M].199798.[13].[J].20023:4-8.[14].[J].20004:18-20.[15].[M].:199618.[16].[J].20029:38-39.[17].[J].20006:43-44.[18].[M]1998108.[19].[M].1995:219.4243A[1][J].20064.[2][J].20066.[3][J].20071.中外档案开放利用中的法律问题之比较研究作者：舒任颖学位授予单位：湘潭大学本文链接：