两岸票据法比较研究

-1-………………………………………………...3………………...7…………….………..7…………………..………...10………………………..121………………………….…...132………………………..…...253…………………….……...334…………………….………...38……………...41…………………………...411…………………………...412…………………..………...42-2-…………………………...44……………………...45…………………….………461…………………………….....462……………………………....47…………49……………………...49……………………...491…………………………...492…………………….....523…………………….....52……55…………………………….…...61…………………………...62……………………...64……………………………………...65-3-ABSTRACT……………..………………...67…………………………………………...70-4-192919192992810301195419601973197819861986-5-1464019559195991972198312-6-1984919881221995510111-7--8-1423101-9-21124101521-10-6-11--12--13-122-14--15--16-26-17-9-18--19-78121-20-385130-21-11-22-871871871-23-1391213-24-126901902-25-2129-26-31441894-27-373929292-28-30313-29-3337-30-411197341-31-197341114361533512-32-4090890916402351404-33-31441171042442-34-18164526-35-243242-36-4214712-37-51-38-4111842-39-47160-40-6063-41-115336932-42-69219216653-43-21102691792-44-921071525473-45-20-46-1211361922-47-276-48--49-112119-50-1224-51-6364(1)(2)(3)287-52-31106-53-210727-54--55--56-971218-57-161816189729899-58-99100-59-101101-60--61-119802219963331979324918359184619964719796081979639197938-39101994172111996-62-118121980461319807461419794515199614516197947171996156181987173191994281201996210211996214-63-11980219963197949519964619947198081987-64--65--66-COMPARATIVESTUDYONBILLLAWSOFTHEMAINLANDOFCHINAANDTAIWAN(ABSTRACT)ThisthesisattemptstocompareBillLawoftheMainlandofChinawithBillLawofTaiwan,whichiscomposedofthreeparts.ThefirstpartmakescomparativestudyonBillActs.ThesecondpartmakescomparativestudyonBillPayment.ThethirdpartmakescomparativestudyonPreservingBillRights.ThefirstpartofthethesismakesacomparativeapproachtotheprovisionsofBillActsstipulatedinthe-67-BillLawsoftheMainlandofChinaandTaiwan.ThereasonlessnessofBillActsisacceptedintheBillLawofTaiwan,whileitisnotacceptedthoroughlyintheBillLawoftheMainlandofChina.ComparedwithinternationallegislativerulesofBillLaws,theBillLawoftheMainlandofChinaiscomparativelyconservativeregardingtothereasonlessnessofBillActs.ConcerningvarietiesofBillActs,InterventionbehaviorsandPaymentbyguaranteehavebeenstipulatedintheBillLawofTaiwan,whichhavenotstipulatedintheBillLawoftheMainlandofChina.ThethesismakesanillustrationontheInterventionbehaviorsandPaymentbyguarantee,andalsomakesaspecificcomparativeapproachtotheprovisionsofBillActssuchasDrawingofBills,Endorsement,AcceptanceandGuaranteewhichhavestipulatedbothintheBillLawsoftheMainlandofChinaandTaiwan.Thesecondpartofthethesismakes-68-comparativestudyonBillPayment,whichhavestipulatedintheBillLawsoftheMainlandofChinaandTaiwan.ThecomparativestudyiscarriedoutinthefourrespectssuchasPresentationforPayment,PaymentAmount,ExaminationObligationofPayerandSpecialPayment.Throughthecomparativestudy,thethesisanalysesthesimilaritiesanddifferencesoftheprovisionsofBillpaymentbetweenBillLawoftheMainlandofChinaandBillLawofTaiwan,andjudgeswhichissuperior.ThethirdpartofthethesismakescomparativestudyonPreservingBillRights,whichhavestipulatedintheBillLawsoftheMainlandofChinaandTaiwan.ThecomparativestudyfocusesontheprovisionsofProtestingfordishonorstipulatedintheBillLawsoftheMainlandofChinaandTaiwan.ThethesistriestofindthewaystosettlethelegalconflictsarisenfromthedifferencesbetweenBillLawoftheMainlandofChinaandBillLawofTaiwan.-69-ThroughcomparativestudyonBillLawsoftheMainlandofChinaandTaiwan,theauthorexpectsthatthethesiscanbehelpfulforlegalcircleandeconomiccircleoftheMainlandofChinaandTaiwantounderstandeachother’sBillLaw.-70-COMPARATIVESTUDYONBILLLAWSOFTHEMAINLANDOFCHINAANDTAIWANCATALOGUEINTRODUCTIONA)BriefIntroductionofBillLawofTaiwanB)BriefIntroductionofBillLawofTheMainlandofChina-71-A.COMPARATIVESTUDYONBILLACTSA)ReasonlessnessproblemofBillActsB)VarietiesofBillActsC)SpecificBillActsa)DrawingofBillsb)Endorsementc)Acceptanced)GuaranteeB.COMPARATIVESTUDYONBILLPAYMENTA)PresentationforPaymenta)Partyofpresentationforpaymentb)LimitationofpresentationforpaymentB)PaymentAmountC)ExaminationObligationofPayerD)SpecialPaymenta)Paymentexceedingthelimitb)DrawingpaymentC.COMPARATIVESTUDYONPRESERVINGBILLRIGHTS-72-A)BriefDescriptionB)ProtestingforDishonora)Varietiesofprotestfordishonorb)Limitationofprotestingc)ModeofprotestingAPILOGUE:SettlementofLegalConflictbetweenBillLawoftheMainlandOfChinaandBillLawofTaiwanAPPENDIXINDEXAPPENDIXANNOTATIONAPPENDIXLISTOFREFERENCEBOOKSABSTRACTCONCLUDINGREMARKS