地下水质量指标分类综合评价方法研究

Vol．41No．6Nov．2014HYDＲOGEOLOGY＆ENGINEEＲINGGEOLOGY416201411121311．1000832．6100713．330013GB/T14848－19933993。。。。。。P641A1000-3665201406-0006-072013-10-252014-01-1212120111211731988-。[e-mail]。1。。、。“”、、GB/T14848－1993399347。。2、3～4、5、6。78。19。2、3。10。11。12。。。。。1。6·7·。20。。。。。。。13。1.11GB/T14848－XXX《》2010。2GB/T14848－XXX《》。3ⅠⅡⅢⅣⅤ。4ⅠⅡⅢⅣⅤ1。1Table1LevelclassificationoforganolepticandgeneralchemicalindicatorsⅠⅠ60%Ⅱ40%ⅢⅣⅤ。Ⅱ。ⅠⅡ70%Ⅲ30%ⅣⅤ。Ⅲ、。Ⅰ、ⅡⅢ80%Ⅳ20%Ⅴ。Ⅳ、、。Ⅰ、Ⅱ、ⅢⅣ90%Ⅴ10%。ⅤⅤ10%。Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ。1.2GB/T14848－XXX《》。1.31415。1CDI=CW×IＲ×EF×EDBW×ATCDI———mg/kg/dCW———mg/LIＲ———2.0L/dEF———365d/aED———70aBW———60kgAT———d70a×365d/a30a×365d/a。Ｒi'=CDIＲfD×10－6Ｒi'———iＲfD———mg/kg/d10－6———ＲfD。2Ｒi=CDI×SFＲi———iSF———mg/kg/d－1。3ＲT=∑Ｒi＇+∑ＲiＲT———·8·2014ΣＲi'———10－6。ΣＲi———1.4。Ⅲ－510－522009。2.1、、、、、、、、、1181。GB/T14848－XXX《》。1。Ⅲ。Ⅳ40%。ⅡⅤ10%。。2.2GB/T14848－XXX《》3030、、、、、、、、、、、、12－、112－、、11－、、、、、、、、、b、a、、γ－、DDT、。1348.15%。433.33%。518.52%。4、5、、、a4。1Fig．1Evaluationresultsoforganolepticindicatorsandgeneralchemicalandtoxicologicalindicators2.3302。3。210－492.6%。10－310－55%。10－6～10－45%10－4。2Fig．2Distributionoftotalhealthriskoftoxicologicalindicators。3。3ⅢⅣ。Ⅴ。3。4、5。2.4GB14848－93114。6·9·3Fig．3ＲesultsofcomprehensivegroundwaterevaluationinaregionofHuaiHeＲiverBasin2Table2Therelevantparametersoftoxicologicalindicatorsmg/kg/day－1mg/kg/day－11.50E+00IＲIS5.50E－02IＲIS3.80E－01CALEPA1.10E－02CALEPA8.50E－03CALEPA1.20E－01CALEPA1.90E－02CALEPAb7.30E－01IＲIS7.00E－02IＲISa7.30E+00IＲIS2.10E－03IＲIS6.30E+00IＲIS12-4.70E－02CALEPAγ-1.10E+00CALEPA112-5.70E－02IＲIS3.40E－01IＲIS7.90E－03IＲIS1.60E+00IＲISmg/kg/daymg/kg/dayN1.60E－01USEPA8.00E－02USEPAN1.60E+00USEPA2.00E－01USEPA6.00E－02USEPA3.00E－01USEPA3.00E－04USEPA4.00E－02IＲIS5.00E－03USEPA2.00E－02IＲIS3.00E－03USEPA11－5.00E－02USEPAATSDＲ-TheAgencyforToxicSubstancesandDiseaseＲegistryCALEPA-CaliforniaEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyGSI-GSIEnvironmentalInc．HCl-HealthCanadaIＲIS-IntegratedＲiskInformationSystemPPＲTV-TheProvisionalPeerＲeviewedToxicityValuesUSEPA-UnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyWHO-WorldHealthOrganization411Ⅳ70%5Ⅳ。Ⅴ·10·201428%。Ⅱ。Ⅰ、Ⅲ。Ⅲ。。1130。4146。4Fig．4ElevenindicatorsandfortyoneindicatorsevaluationresultsofNemerowmethod5Fig．5DistributionoforganolepticandgeneralchemicalindicatorsevaluationresultsoftheNemerowmethod6Fig．6DistributionofallindicatorsevaluationresultsoftheNemerowmethod6·11·41130Ⅳ93.83%。Ⅱ、Ⅴ4%。ⅣⅡ、Ⅴ。。。3。。1。。2。1．M．1995.WANGDCZHANGＲQSHIYHetal．BasisofHydrogeologyM．BeijingGeologicalPublishingHouse1995.inChinese2．J．200814154－55.WANGWQ．ApplicationofAggregativeIndexNumberMethodinGroundwaterQualityEvaluationJ．WaterConservancyScienceandTechnologyandEconomy200814154－55.inChinese3．J．2011303289－294.BIANWYTONGCYLIANTetal．ApplicationoftheFuzzyMethodintheComprehensiveEvaluationoftheEnvironmentQualityofShallowGroundwaterintheLiapningCentralAreaJ．ＲockandMineralAnalysis2011303289－294.inChinese4．J20103736－11.JIAOXSUXSLINXYetal．AFuzzymethodforgroundwaterqualityevaluationintroducedwithweightofsampledifferenceJ．Hydrogeology＆EngineeringGeology20103736－11.inChinese5．J．201228525－28.LIYSZHANGZJFEIYHetal．ApplicationofanimprovedgreyclusteringmethodtogroundwaterqualityevaluationJ．WaterＲesourcesProtection201228525－28.inChinese6．J．201239294－99.WANGNDONGWHZHANGYetal．ApplicationofattributerecognitionmodelbasedoncoefficientofentropytogroundwaterqualityassessmentattheSouthernSuburbsLandfillofKaifengJ．Hydrogeology＆EngineeringGeology201239294－99.inChinese7．J．2008273279－283.ZENGYCDAIYLIUNetal．GroundwaterqualityevaluationanditsapplicationbasedonindexclassificationJ．GlobalGeology2008273279－283.inChinese8．J．2011343－46.LUWXLIDZHANGLetal．ApplicationofFuzzyComprehensiveEvaluationBasedonAHPinWaterQualityEvaluationJ．WaterSavingIrrigation2011343－46.inChinese9．———J．20113816－10.LIYSZHANGZJFEIYHetal．OptimalselectionandanalysisofgroundwaterqualityevaluationmethodsAcasestudyintheHutuoＲiveralluvialpluvialfanJ．Hydrogeology＆EngineeringGeology20113816－10.inChinese10KumarSKＲammohanVSahayamJDetal．Assessmentofgroundwaterqualityandhydrogeochemistryofmanimukthariverbasintamil·12·2014naduindiaJ．Environmentalmonitoringandassessment20091591/2/3/4341－351.11VenugopalTGiridharanLJayaprakashM．GroundwaterqualityassessmentusingchemometricanalysisintheadyarriversouthindiaJ．Archivesofenvironmentalcontaminationandtoxicology2008552180－190.12CrévecoeurSDebackerVJoaquim-JustoCetal．Groundwaterqualityassessmentofoneformerindustrialsiteinbelgiumusingatriad-likeapproachJ．EnvironmentalPollution2011159102461－2466.13．J．20113251329－1339.DUANXLWANGZSLIQetal．HealthＲiskAssessmentofHeavyMetalsinDrinkingWaterBasedonFieldMeasurementofExposureFactorsofChinesePeopleJ．EnvironmentalScience20113251329－1339.inChinese14USEPA．IntegratedＲiskInformationSystemEB/OL．2010－08－23.http//．epa．gov/ncea/iris/index．html．15USEPA．EPA/540/1－89/002.ＲiskAssessmentGuidanceforSuperfundVolumeIHumanHealthEvaluationManualPartAS．1989.ＲesearchoncomprehensiveevaluationmethodsofgroundwaterqualityindexclassificationXUZhen12HEJiang-tao1MAWen-jie3ZENGYing11.BeijingKeyLaboratoryofWaterＲesourcesandEnvironmentalEngineeringSchoolofWaterＲesourcesandEnvironment