您好,欢迎访问三七文档
当前位置:首页 > 商业/管理/HR > 公司方案 > 高氨氮废水与城市生活污水短程硝化系统菌群比较赵志瑞
34420134ENVIRONMENTALSCIENCEVol.34No.4Apr.2013123341*41121.1000852.1000493.1000224.050018.16SrDNA、PLFAPCR、.ProteobacteriaBacteroidete..PCRAOBNOBAOBNOB3AOBNOB2.16SrDNAPLFAPCRX172A0250-3301201304-1448-092012-06-192012-10-12KZZD-EW-09-3KZCX2-YW-JC407-3KSCX2-YW-G-054-21975~E-mailzhiruizh@163.com*E-mailzhbai@rcees.ac.cnComparingMicrobialCommunityofHighAmmoniaWastewaterandMunicipalSewageinaPartialNitrificationSystemZHAOZhi-rui12MABin3ZHANGShu-jun3LIBin4BAIZhi-hui1WANGXiao-hui4ZHUANGGuo-qiang1ZHANGHong-xun121.ResearchCenterforEco-EnvironmentalSciencesChineseAcademyofSciencesBeijing100085China2.UniversityofChineseAcademyofSciencesBeijing100049China3.BeijingDrainageGroupCo.Ltd.Beijing100022China4.CollegeofEnvironmentalScienceandEngineeringHebeiUniversityofScienceandTechnologyShijiazhuang050018ChinaAbstractNitritationisanimportantpartofthebiologicalnitrogenremovalprocessandtheperformanceoftheprocesswasdeterminedbythemicrobialcommunitystructure.Toexplorethemicrobialadaptabilitytodifferentsewagethemicrobialdiversityandtheamountofbacteriawereinvestigatedinahighammoniawastewatertreatmentprocessandasewagetreatmentprocessusingtheclonelibraryofbacterial16SrDNAthephospholipidfattyacidmethodPLFAandthequantitativePCR.TheclonelibraryresultsshowedthattherewasasignificantlydifferenceinbacterialcommunitystructureofthesetwoprocessesalthoughthedominantbacteriabelongtotheProteobacteriaandBacteroidetethereweremoreclustersinthesewagetreatmentprocess.ThePLFAsresultsshowedthatthemicrobialdiversityindexandtheevennessindexofthehighammoniumwastewatertreatmentprocessweresignificantlylow.ThequantitativePCRresultsshowedthatamountsofammoniaoxidizingbacteriaAOBandnitrite-oxidizingbacteriaNOBinthehighammoniumwastewatertreatmentprocesswerehigherthantheseinsewagetreatmentprocess.ThecopynumberofAOBwashigherthanthecopynumberofNOBinthehighammoniawastewatertreatmentprocessbythreeordersmagnitude.ThecopynumberofAOBwashigherthanthecopynumberofNOBinsewagetreatmentprocessbytwoordersofmagnitude.Keywordspartialnitritationbiologicalnitrogenremoval16SrDNAclonelibraryphospholipidfattyacidPLFAquantitativePCR1234.56.78.AOBNOB9.410h.10.AOBNOB.AOBNOB11..FAFNA1213...AOBDO14.16SrDNA.PCRAOBNOB.11.1/A/O.A/O24L615.A/O28L7161....A/O26±1℃.、12.1/A/OFig.1Schematicdiagramofplug-flowanoxic/oxicA/Oprocess1A/O1Table1RunningconditionsofA/OreactorQ/L·d-1HRT/hSRT/dDO828.2100.411843.134.50.961QHRTSRTDO2A/O1Table2InfluentqualityandrunningeffectofA/Oreactor/mg·L-1COD/mg·L-1MLSS/mg·L-1SVI/mL·g-1NAR/%42.08~53.1647.70121.0~165.7142.63500~5000430074~777584.59~93.9990.60291~387337100~1711282500~3500306452~957795.0~98.396.61MLSSSVINAR1.21.2.1DNAPCRDNA0.5gDNAOmegaUSADNA40ng·μL-1.DNA16SrDNA27f/1492rPCR15.PCR50μL10×buffer5μLdNTPs10mmol·L-11μL27f、1492r10μmol·L-11μLTaq2.5U0.5μLDNA0.5μL20ng94413450μL.95℃3min95℃1min56℃1min72℃2min3072℃10min4℃.1.2.23SDNAPCRPCRpGEM-TeasyvectorPromegaUSA.2×RapidLigationBuffer5μLpGEM-Teasyvector50ng·μL-11μLPCR75ng3∶1T4DNAligase1μL4℃.DH5αTiangenAMPIPTGX-GalLB37℃12hAMPLBPCR1500bp.230T7/SP6PCRRsalPromegaUSAHhalPromegaUSA1BioeditGenBankclustalx1.83DoCompleteAlignmentBootstrapN-Jtree1000MEGA4.1.1.2.3SYBRGreenAOBEub338/Nso122516NOBNSR1113/FNSR1264R1716SrDNAPCRAOB59×1010NOB3.61×1010.DNARealMasterMixSYBRGreenTIANGENNPCRMx3000PPCRGenetimes.25μL0.5μL10μmol·L-12μLDNA9μL2.5×MasterMix3.Ct.AOBNOBCt.1.2.4PLFAsPLFAsPLFAsPLFAs.Bligh-Dyer185g0.01gPLFA.ctaianteiso-CCiso-CCbr10Me10cyαβ—OH2、3Ci130a130i140i150a150i160i170a170141ω5c151ω6c161ω7c161ω7t161ω5c181ω9c181ω7c181ω7t182ω6c183ω6c183ω3c1920.PLFAs.SPSS13.0.Shannon-WienerHH'.PielouE.H=-Σpilnpipi=ni/NE=H/HmaxHHmaxHmax=lnSSniiN21.22.10541436OTUs23OTUs5.Bacteroidetes26.9%Chloroflexi13.7%Spirochaetes12.3%Firmicutes4.7%.Proteobacteria42.4%Snaidr22Proteobacteria.Proteobacteriaβ-β-Proteobacteria22.2%γ-γ-Proteobacteria1.9%δ-δ-Proteobacteria4.7%α-α-Proteobacteria9.9%ε-ε-Proteobacteria3.7%.2Fig.2Phylogenetictreeofthebacteriaofactivesludgeinthehighammonianitrogenprocess2.2221555OTU.45OTU723.26%1.4%4.68%.Actinobacteria1.86%.Planctomycetes3.72%.Denitrifyingbacterium5.56%.52.1%.Proteobacteriaβ-、δ-γ-、α-23.72%、2.8%、14.88%、10.7%.Unculturedbacterium7.46%.、45.26%.1541343Fig.3Phylogenetictreeoftheproteobacteriaofactivesludgeinthehighammonianitrogenprocess、.①β-23AOBNitrosomonasNitrosospira24②γ-NOBNitrococcus③δ-Desulfobacterales、Desulfoarculaceae、NOBNitrospina25.α、β、γ、δ.Nitrobacter...254144Fig.4Phylogenetictreeofthebacteriaofactivesludgeinthemunicipalwastewaterprocess.NO-2NH+4anaerobicammoniumoxidationANAMMOX.26DO.2.3PCRrRNA27PCR.16SrDNA3541345Fig.5PhylogenetictreeoftheproteobacteriaofactivesludgeinthemunicipalwastewaterprocessAOB6.69×108NOB3.58×10516SrDNAAOB3.17×106NOB4.15×104.AOBNOB.AOB2NOB1AOBNOB3NOB.AOBNOB.AOB.AOB.454142.4PLFAsPLFAs.9.43nmol·g-112.0nmol·g-1.6.HE3.126Fig.6Comparisonofsamplebiomass3Table3ComparisonofthediversityindexandEvennessindexofsamplesH1.241.41E0.6370.7253..31、、、、α-Proteobacteria、β-Proteobacteria、γ-Proteobacteriaδ-Proteobacteria.、.2AOBAOB/NOB..1RabalaisNNTurnerREScaviaD.BeyondscienceintopolicyGulfofMexicohypoxiaandtheMississippiRiverJ.
本文标题:高氨氮废水与城市生活污水短程硝化系统菌群比较赵志瑞
链接地址:https://www.777doc.com/doc-6562774 .html