行政执法与刑事司法衔接机制中若干问题理论探究

2011年第4期No.4,2011ZHEJIANGSOCIALSCIENCES2011年4月Apr.,2011*谢治东在行政执法与刑事司法衔接中,行政执法机关移送涉嫌犯罪案件前,可先行作出行政处罚,并不违反一事不二罚刑事优先原则;行政证据同样具有刑事诉讼证据的关联性合法性和真实性基本属性,经公安机关调取后,应当作为刑事诉讼证据使用在现行的立法框架下,检察机关对行政执法机关移送涉嫌犯罪案件实行检察监督,缺乏明确的宪法和法律依据,应该修改检察院组织法相关规定行政执法行政处罚一事不二罚行政证据检察监督作者谢治东,浙江工商大学诉讼法中心副教授,博士(杭州310018)20017(),,,,,,,,,,,?,:,,,,,11:,;,,,,,:;*:(08BO2)54浙江社会科学2011年第4期,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,11,,,,,,,,,:,,,,,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,28:,,,;,,,39:,,,,,,,,,,:,,,,,,;,,,55谢治东:行政执法与刑事司法衔接机制中若干问题理论探究,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,?,,:1.,,,:,,2.,,,4345,,3.,,:;,,,,,,:(1)56浙江社会科学2011年第4期,,,,;(2),,,;(3),,;(4),,,,;(5),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,42,,,,18:,:(1);(2);(3);(4);(5);(6);(7),,,,,,4345,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,57谢治东:行政执法与刑事司法衔接机制中若干问题理论探究,,,,14,,,,,,,,,,?129:1,?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1291,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1954,,,1954,19781954,198219791982121,,1954:,19791954,5,,;58浙江社会科学2011年第4期;,,,,,,,,,:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:黄德荣:涉嫌犯罪的税务案件能否先处罚再移送,中国税务报2008年2月26日柯庆张荣洪:涉税犯罪案件不应先作行政处罚再移送司法机关,人民公安报2005年3月18日阮方民:徇私舞弊不移交刑事案件罪的若干司法与立法问题,法学2002年第2期于改之吴玉萍:徇私舞弊不移交刑事案件罪若干问题探究,载刘远王大海:行政执法与刑事执法衔接机制论要,中国检察出版社2006年版,第337页汪永清:行政处罚,中国政法大学出版社1994年版,第21页简敏:行政处罚中一事不再罚原则的适用与例外,重庆大学学报(社会科学版)2002年第4期周佑勇刘艳红:论行政处罚与刑事处罚的适用衔接,法律科学1997年第2期金文彤:论刑事优先原则及其适用,法学评论1995年第6期邓忠祥:刍议行政执法机关所收集的证据效能,检察实践2002年第6期,第72页宋巍生:关于检察监督的思考,中国刑事法杂志2000年第1期陈国庆:检察制度原理,法律出版社2009年版,第106页陈兴良:刑法方法论研究,清华大学出版社2006年版,第8页韩大元:关于检察机关性质的宪法文本解读,人民检察2005年第7期上蔡定剑:司法改革中检察职能的转变,政治与法律1999年第1期王大海:行政执法与刑事执法衔接机制的理性思考,载刘远王大海:行政执法与刑事执法衔接机制论要,中国检察出版社2006年版,第56页责任编辑陈亚飞59ABSTRACTSsitionhassignificantimpactonurbanhouseholdsavingrate.Fourth,thereisnosignificantlyrelationshipbetweenhouseholdwealthandsavingrate,andcharacteristicsoffamilyheadalsohadacertaininfluenceonsavingrateforurbanhousehold.Keywords:UrbanHousehold,SavingRate,Determinants,ChinaGeneralSocialSurveyHowWebRationalityisPossible?ACaseStudyonCJDBYBBS(34)LiuDazhi,YuJianxing(CollegeofPublicAdministration,ZhejiangUniversity,Hangzhou310027)Abstract:RecognizingmuchIrrationalityinChineseInterne,twethinkwebRationalityplaysafundamentalrolewhendiscussingtheimpactofInternetonChinesecivilsociety.Throughobservationandsurvey,wefindthatCJDBYBBSdemonstratesrelativelyhighrationality:objectivity,opennessorpluralism,anti-rumorandmoderatepositioninonlinepublicdiscussion.Itsrationalitymechanismbasedoneducatedmembers,scientificethosandstrictregulation.Wearguethatwebrationalityisamulti-dimensionconstruc,titssocializationprocessandpossibilitiesexpandingtobigvirtualcommunityandofflineactionremainunknown.Keywords:WebRationality,RationalityMechanism,CJDBYBBS,CaseStudyCyberDemocracy:PublicDeliberationandInstitutionalInnovation(41)XuXun(ZhejiangGongshangUninversity,Hangzhou310018)Abstract:Thedemocraticbasesincyber-societymakecyber-democracypossible.Cyber-democracydefinestheinnovativeprocessofcollectiveactionincyberspacewhere,takingadvantagesofthemediaofinternet,netizensactascitizensparticipatinginpublicaffairs,influencingpoliticalandsocialdecision-makinginordertoconstructpubliclife.Thefunctionalorientationofcyber-democracyispublicdeliberationandpublicgovernancethatdeterminestheprinciplesofcyberdemocracyinstitutionalinnovationwhicharetomaketheformationofpublicsphereascoreobjective,tomakethepublicuseofreasonasrequisite,andtomaketheestablishmentofinteractivelinksofcyberdemocraticcollectiveactionwithsocialcollectiveactionandtheworksofformalinstitutionalsystem.Andcyber-democracyinstitutionalinnovationalsoincludesdetailssuchasdirectingcyberdemocraticactionwithprincipleofpublicity,promotingthecommunicationandintegrationofmultiplereasons,constructingthesystemofinformationsharing,takingthepublicdeliberationoflocalpublicaffairsasbasicplatformsofcyber-democracy.Keywords:Cyber-Democracy,Cyber-Society,PublicDeliberation,PublicSphereOnFunctionofCivilDisobedience(48)LiShouchu(EastChinaUniversityofPoliticalScienceandLaw,Shanghai200042)Abstract:Civildisobedienceisanunlawfulbehaviorinademocraticsociety,whichisdifferentfromallformsoflegalprotes,trevolutionandgeneralcrime.Ithasacertainnegativeimpactoreffectonsociety,butitwillnotunderminetheruleoflawandleadtoanarchy.Itisthedrivingforceandmeansofsocialprogress,notonlybroadensthechannelstomaintainthefundamentalrightsofcitizens,butalsohaspositiveeffectonthesounddevelopmentofthelaw,theachievementoflegalsubstantivejusticeandtheovercomeoflegalformaldefects.Keywords:CivilDisobedience,Function,LegitimacyTheoreticalAnalysisonSomeProblemsofCohesiveDevicesoftheAdministrativeLawEnforcementandCriminalJustice(54)XieZhidong(LawSchoo,lZhejiangGongshangUniversity,Hangzhou310018)Abstract:Theadministrativeorganforlawenforcementmayfirstcarryoutadministrativepenaltybeforetheytransfersuspectedcriminalcases,whichdoesnotviolatetheprincipleofnoonetobepunishedtwiceforthesameoffenseandcriminalpriority.Theadministrativeevidencewhichalsohasthreebasicattributesofrelevance,validityandauthenticity,shouldbeusedascriminalevidenceafterextractedbypublicsecurityorgans.Undertheexistinglegislativeframeworks,Prosecutorialsupervisiontotheadministrativeorganstransferringthesuspectedcriminalcaseslackclearconstitutiona