中国都市体育竞争力研究

北京体育大学博士学位论文中国都市体育竞争力研究姓名：张春萍申请学位级别：博士专业：体育人文社会学指导教师：秦椿林200605013200220044AbstractThepaperstudiesChineseMetropolisSportsCompetitivenessBeijing,ShanghaiandTianjinareselectedasthesubjectduringthespanoftime2002to2004.BythemethodsoftheDelphiMethodandAnalyticHierarchyProcessetc,theChineseMetropolisSportsCompetitivenessiselaboratedinthepaperfromthreedimensions,whichareathletics,masssportsandsportsindustry.AnIndexEvaluationSystemisdesignedfortheMetropolisSportsCompetitivenessinthepaper,whichrankstheMetropolisSportsCompetitiveness.Thepaperanalyzestheiruniversalityandindividualityandthecause,thensubmittheupgradeapproach.Thesearealsotheinnovationsofthepaper.Thepaperincludes,ThefirstsectionincludesChapter2,and3,introducingthebasictheoryofcompetenceandbackground.Thecompetitionisacontestprocessaimingatattainingresourcesbybothormorecompetitorswiththeirefforts,andtheCompetitivenessisthepredominantcapabilityshowninthecompetition.AfterhavingcomprehensivelystudiedthecompetitivenessclassicaltheoryandtheIndexEvaluationSystem,thepaperconcludesthattheMetropolisSportsCompetitivenessisacapabilitythatacityattractsresources,obtainsdevelopmentpreference,realizesustainabledevelopment,andthenwinthecompetition.AndthepapersummarizestheChineseMetropolisSportsstatusfromtheexistingsportsresources,sportvalueconceptetc.,andinducestheMetropolissportssystematicnessanddynamicness.ThesecondpartincludesChapter4,and5.Inthispart,IndexEvaluationSystemforChineseMetropolisSportsCompetitivenessandTestamentAnalysisareintroduced.TheIndexEvaluationSystemsetsthemasssports,athleticsandsportsindustryasthefirstlevelindices,andtherelativerepresentativesasthesecondandthirdindiceswithweightingdesign.WhenanalyzingtherankingresultoftheMetropolisSportCompetitiveness,theconclusionisthattheSportCompetitivenessisincreasing,andthestatusisfairlystable;thetargetoftheMetropolissportandits5Competitivenessiscompliancewiththerelationsofactionandreaction;athleticsdevelopmentlevelandtheinvestmentinthesportindustryhavestrongpertinence;sportindustrydevelopmentandtheMetropoliseconomylevelrelatestightly;certainpublicaccidentgreatlyaffectstheMetropolissport;moreandmoreprofessionalsworkfortheindustry,however,highlevelintellectualsarestillneeded.Thesection3includesChapter6.Thispartintroduces:TheupgradingapproachofChineseMetropolisSportsCompetitiveness,Employcompetenceadvantage,ClarifyMetropolissportsdevelopmentstrategy,Tightlycopewiththetimes,Improvethesportsmanagementcapabilityofmunicipallevel;Optimizethedevelopmentenvironment,ConstructMetropolissportssupportingstructure;Promotesportsindustrydevelopment,Activelypushenterprisesbrandstrategy;Strengthenregionalcollaboration;developthesportintegrationandexchangesamongnearbycities.Keywords:Competence,MetropolisSports,MetropolisSportsCompetitiveness12006622200662111.121203060%[1][2][3][1]...1992.41[2][]..2002.2[3]...2003.1542500APEC2010,2006315080124200130[1],,F1NBA2008[1]...2004236745-74641.220022004200351.31.3.1405001.3.21.3.3401.3.41.3.561.3.61.3.71.3.8200220041.420022004781.5922.12.1.1[1][1]...2002.1910[1]2.1.2[2][3][1]...200322125-27[2]...2002.3435[3]...2004.6112.1.32-1InternationalInstituteforManagementDevelopmentIMDWorldEconomicForumWEF1996thePresident'sCommissiononIndustrialcompetitiveness12[1]Cohenandzyman19892.1.4[1]...20046128-138132.2177614151942208090(1980)(1985)(1990)162-120044717[1],,[2][1]...20048326-30[2]...2005349-52182.32.3.180WEFIMD1995IMDWEF2.3.2WEF8300192-2IMD200440=++19983(1998)2000()202-320044520038[1]3GDPGDP[1]...200426464-67210.20.30.51[1]++++++200[1]...2004541-45222-4200350[1][2][1]...2002562-69[2].2004816GDP23[1][2]1998[1]...20041838-9[2]...200311233242533.13.1.126Metropolis0.001190000001000GDP1200060%80%GDP70%80%60%[1]:1620022003GDP[1]...1999349-5327100050020050010020050100501000307624357820002GDP45%(7000)(9)(40)28200230008240320038077128.5150.932003GDP2002200320042003-200415200220032004281293-12002-200320021284531423.216251007.18100020031292271456.417111011.3020029601680063411192060002003960168006341119202002105172.33212.71005408.76002051.1600GDP20002003117251.93663.10006250.81002447.660020028184277464064622380GDP220039101320614671826532200234.3%61.3%51%47.1%45%200333.2%61.5%48.4%45.3%2002603010285.83104647191.97(7000)2003651111123.81104078682002773.25914.80502.785002003878.351027.77573.2220028920037.919.999.899.462002884.2181120.2236.33(40)20031085226.6142.78422002-20032002-20032002-20032002-200363.1.2MetropolitanDistrict1950[1][1]...19939161930[1]3.1.3[1]...2003.6-7313.23.2.1[1]715200033.93%200040%200249.47%200350.3%200452.4%200240%40%200445%[1]...19991859-1332201019.2%200498824907177358797612.59%10.47%4.28%1.48%0.75%20031.032.21.83200410.11%8.23%2.23%1.28%0.42%3-22004988249071773587976200412.59%10.47%1.59%1.48%0.75%200410.11%8.35%2.23%1.28%0.42%20036.59%3.15%4.01%2.01%19931999152002303.79%5.72%2.93%2.45%2.57%1.36%20034.82%2.78%0.31%2002589372112220044282203331181518571200429713115120033475120145139483-320036.59%3.15%4.01%2.01%20023.79%5.72%2.93%1.37%0.84%20022.45%2.57%1.36%0.91%20034.82%2.78%1.49%0.31%1.08%