社会福利场域的习惯

-iiiAbstractTheimportantroleofwelfareculturesinshapingsocialwelfaremodelsdrawsmoreandmoreattentionoftheresearcherswiththeculturalturn,broadeninganddeepeninginthestudyofsocialwelfare.Somescholarsthinkthatdifferencesbetweenwelfareculturesarethemainfactorsinfluencinganddeterminingsocialwelfaremodels.Thisisamacro-theoreticalhypothesis.Ittakesalotofacademicachievementtomakepositiveexaminationofthismacro-theoreticalhypothesis.Startingfromthemicro-stage(community),thisdissertationinquiresintothewelfareculturesoftheJinuoandBulangnationalitiestheeconomicdevelopmentofwhichissimilar.Thepurposeofthisstudyistomakeclearifthereareanydifferencesbetweenthewelfareculturesofdifferentnationalitieswithsimilareconomicdevelopment,andwhattheyareifthereany.Thisdissertationputsforwardaconceptualframetostudywelfareculturesandtestsitinthisstudy.Thisiscomparativestudyoftwonationalitycommunity’swelfareculturesfromtheviewpointofculture.iiiThisdissertationconsistsofeightchapters.Chapter1—Introduction,summarizesandanalyzesfivetheoreticalpointsintheinterpretingandstudyingsocialwelfarefromtheviewpointofculture,explainsindetailthelogicandbasisforthisstudy,discussesandconstructstheconceptualframetostudywelfareculturesofthisdissertation,andstatesthemaincharacteristicsandsignificanceofthisstudy.Chapter2—SummaryoftheDocuments,summarizesandcriticizestheliteratureofandachievementinthestudyofwelfareculturesandexplainstherelationsbetweenthemandthisstudy.Chapter3—ResearchDesign—analyzestherelationsbetweenBourdieu’stheoryof“field-habitus”anditsrelationwiththestudyofwelfarecultures.Italsodiscussesandexplainshowthetheoryof“field-habitus”isusedinthisstudy.Itgivestheinformationhowthesitesforfactsfindingwaschosenandtheirbasiccircumstancesandexpoundsindetailhowtocarryoutthefactsfinding.Chapter4—BasicHabitusofWelfareField,analyzesthebasichabitusofwelfarefield,namelytheconceptofwelfaremodels,oftheJinuoandBulangnationalities.Itdiscussesindepththerelationsbetweennationalitiesandtheconceptofwelfaremodelsandthesocialmeaningofthedegreeofthiscorrelation.Chapter5—HabitusofWelfareSub-Field(A),analyzestheconceptsofpoverty,relief,andprovidingfortheagedoftheJinuoandBulangnationalities.Theytwohavedifferentviewsonthecausesofpoverty,differentattitudestowardspoverty,anddifferentopinionsonhowtoovercomepoverty,anddifferentattitudestowardsreliefandthemoralhazardinreliefaswell.Chapter6—HabitusofWelfareSub-Field(B),analyzestheconceptsofvaluesoflife,diseases,andeducationofJinuoandBulangnationalities.Theyboththinkthatreligionandsorceryaretosomedegreecausesofdiseases,butthedegreeofJinuonationalityisweakerthanthatofBulangnationality.JinuonationalityvalueseducationmorethanBulangnationalitydoes.ThesenseofbeingsexuallyequalineducationofJinuonationalityisstrongerthanthatofBulangnationality.Chapter7—DeepHabitusofWelfareField,analyzestheconceptsofreligiouswelfareofJinuoandBulangnationalities.ThesenseofreligioninlifeofJinuonationalityisweakerthanthatofBulangnationality.Inthefieldofprovidingfortheaged,thesenseofreligioninlifeofJinuonationalityisweakerthanthatofBulangnationality.Inthefieldofmedicalcare,thesenseofreligioninlifeofJinuonationalityisweakerthanthatofBulangnationality.Inthefieldofeducation,religionexertslessinfluenceonJinuonationalitythanBulangnationality.Thedifferentconceptsofreligiouswelfarearethemoststrikingfactorsinthewelfareculturesofthetwonationalities.Chapter8—ResultsofandReflectiononThisStudy,summarizesthewholestudyanddrawsivtheconclusionandmakesfurtheranalysisanddistillation.Relativeproposalsareputforwardaccordingtotheconclusionofthisstudy.Reflectionisalsomadeonthewholestudyandnewtargetsandtentativeplansaresuggestedaccordingtothediscoveriesandenlightenmentofthisstudy.KeyWords:SocialWelfare;WelfareField;WelfareCulture;WelfareHabitus;JinuoNationality;BulangNationality1120242426264446—46v5457626466666768707778788489959696100105116117117121125125145146146150152153156156165170vi1792-1302-2352-3362-4372-5413-1603-2623-3654-1684-268vii4-3694-4694-5714-6724-7724-8735-1795-2805-3815-4825-5855-6865-7885-8915-9936-1976-2976-3976-4986-5996-61016-71016-81026-91036-1020021-101036-111066-121066-131076-141076-151076-161096-171096-181096-191136-20114viii6-211147-11267-21277-31277-41327-51327-61337-71337-81347-91347-101448-1149ixWHwhy?(who)(whom)?(what)howTJohnBaldock1999Culture:TheMissingVariableinUnderstandingSocialPolicy?11999458-473208090208080802000————2000122-12412199478-79Rimlinger,1971Zijderveld1986199479-80JamesMidgleysocialconsciencetheory199798-99PaulSpickerPaulSpicker2000199828-3420001-1321990419966-7MichaelRustin31999257-260201999——199419965-182(shape)(environmentscontexts)(RichardM.Titmuss)1990319909JohnDixon50socialwelfaresystemideologicalvalues1985SocialWelfareinAsia10JohnDixon——21-22NelsonChow466-67D.PaulChowdhry95-96TakeshiTakahashiYoshikoSomeya133-135In-HyubChang——176-178P.C.Sushamaprivatesector215-216EvelinaA.Pangalangandominantvalueframework246-247LaksiriJayasuriya,GamminiFernandoandMalcolmAllbrook(semi-urban)(Hinduism)279-281GordonHou-shengChan324-325YupaWongchai356-35