FDI对区域收入差距影响研究__基于八大经济区的分析

重庆大学硕士学位论文FDI对区域收入差距影响研究——基于八大经济区的分析姓名：姚斯杰申请学位级别：硕士专业：产业经济学指导教师：陈德敏;林勇2010-05IFDIFDIFDIFDIFDIFDIFDIFDIFDIFDI/FDIFDIFDIFDIFDIFDIFDIFDIIIABSTRACTFDIisregardedasoneofmainmanifestationsofglobalization,whichhasbecomethefocusofscholarsandpolicymakersinrecentyears.Undoubtedly,theinflowofFDIhasbroughtincreasedinvestment,technologicalprogressandindustrialagglomerationinChina.FDIisthesynthesisofcapital,knowledgeandtechnology.IthaspromotedChineseeconomicgrowth,anditalsohaseffectonregionalincomegapbecauseofregionaldistributiondisparityofFDI.Thepapertakeseighteconomiczonesasresearchobject,takesmeasureofinter-regionandIntra-regiongapofincomeandFDIbytheuseoftheilindex.ThenwestudytherelationshipbetweenFDIandregionalincomegapthroughthemethodofquantitativeanalysis.Intheend,weputforwardsomesuggestionsabouthowtoreduceregionalincomegapfromtheperspectiveofFDI,inordertoprovidereferenceinformationfortherelevantdecision-making.Theresultsshowthatcomparedwithintra-regiongap,inter-regiongaphashighercontributiontogeneralgapbothinincomegapandFDIgapofeighteconomiczones.Overall,FDIhaspositivecorrelationwithinter-regionincomegap,thatistosay,FDIisanimportantfactortoenlargeChineseinter-regionincomegap,whichisconsistentwithworldsystem/dependencytheory.Withineighteconomiczones,FDIhasdifferentcorrelationwithintra-regionincomegap.FDIhasinconspicuousnesscorrelationwithintra-regionincomegapineasterncoastdistrict,middlereachofYellowRiverandgreatnorthwestregion;FDIhaspositivecorrelationwithintra-regionincomegapinnortheastregion,middlereachofYangtzeRiverandgreatsouthwestregion,thatistosay,theflowofFDIenlargesintra-regionincomegapinthesedistricts;FDIhasnegativecorrelationwithintra-regionincomegapinnortherncoastregion,southerncoastarea,thatistosay,theflowofFDIreducesintra-regionincomegapinthesedistricts.Toalleviateincomegapineighteconomiczoneseffectively,everyzoneshouldbaseuponitspracticeandbringFDI’sfullplaytoeconomicdevelopment,andmainlytakepracticefromthefollowingsevenaspects:strengtheninginternationaleconomiccooperationandtakingefforttobuildregionaleconomiccircle;emphasizingtheusemechanismoftalentandaccumulatingregionalhumancapitaleffectively;basinguponregiondevelopmentstrengthandcreatingdistinctiveeconomy;undertakingtransferofindustryactivelyandpromptingtheupgradeofindustrialstructure;enhancingIIIinfrastructureconstructionandmakinghardtoimprovehardinvestmentenvironment;relyingonalllevelsofgovernmentfunction,greatlyimprovingsoftinvestmentenvironment;innovatinginvitinginvestmentapproachandachievingharmoniousdevelopmentofdomesticandforeignenterprises.Keywords:FDI,RegionalIncomeGap,EightEconomicZones,TheilIndex1111.1“”FDI30FDI301221990FDI21.4%2002WTO20072002009923.9523.58%20095300OECDFDI40%FDIFDIFDIFDIFDIFDIFDIFDIFDI“”12FDIFDIFDI1.21.2.1FDIFDIFDIFDI1.2.2FDIFDIFDIFDIFDI1.31.3.113FDIFDIFDIFDIFDI1.3.2FDIFDIFDIFDI1.3.3FDIFDIFDI1.114FDIFDIFDIFDIFDI1.1Fig.1.1TheDiagramoftheTechnologicalRouteofthePaper1.4FDIFDIFDIFDI151.5FDIFDIFDI262FDIFDIFDI2.12.1.1MacDougall1960[1]MacDougall2.127MP1MP2Q1Q2Q0QM1M2M0ABCDEFGM32.1Fig.2.1TheModelofWelfareEffectofInternationalCapitalFlow2.1MP1MP2Q1QQ2QFQ1QBCQQ2GQ1M0=Q2M3CQQ2GQ0AGQ2AQ0QCAQ0QDACDFQ1QBFQ1Q0AAQ0QDABD2.1.2“/”“/”FDIFDI28“U”Kuznet1955“——”AdelmanRobinson1989[2~3]2.1.3“/”“/”“/”“/”FDIGirlingFDI4—10[4]“”292.22.2.1FDIFDIFDIChase-DunChristopher[5]RobinsonGDPGDP[2]Pan-TongTsai33[6]Aitken[7]NafzigerE.Liberalism[8]GiuliaChoiChangkyuFDIFDI[9]FDIAdelmanRobinson[2][3]DaniRodricFDIFDIFDI[10]AndrewsSavvides80[11]210Milanovic[12]BornaliBhandari1982-1997PanelFDI60FDI[13]2.2.2FDIFDIFDIFDI1987-1998FDIGDPFDIGDP0.22[14]FDIGDP1985-199990%[15]1988-199830GDPFDIGDPFDI[16][17]FDIFDI[18]FDI[19]FDIFDIFDI22.69%17.70%12.10%[20]FDI211[21]1985-200330[22]1987-2003PanelGranger[23]19932006FDI[24]FDI[25]FDISunHaishunFDIFDI[26]29FDI[27][28]FDI[29]FDI[30]FDIFDIFDI[31]1988-2005FDIFDI[32]FDIFDIFDI212[33]FDI[34]2.3FDIFDIFDIFDI“/”“/”FDIFDIFDIFDIFDIFDIFDIFDIFDIFDI3FDI133FDIFDIFDIFDIFDI3.1FDIFDIForeignDirectInvestment[35]FDIFDIFDI[36]2005“”3FDI143.13.1Table3.1TheTableofDivisionandFunctionOrientationofEightEconomicZones“”“--”3.22010“”20103FDI1521U0.20.2-0.30.3-0.40.4-0.50.619990.40.53.13.11992-20072006200720063.11992-2007Fig.3.1TheChangeTrendofGeordieCoefficient(1992-2007)[37]0.30.40.50.63FDI16GDP200736.5%55.3%1.531.9%23.1%8.4%8.7%GDP23.2%12.9%GDPGDPGDP3.23.21992—2007GDPFig.3.2TheChangeTrendofPerCapitaGDPinEightEconomicZones1992-20073.21992GDPGDPGDPGDP20083FDI173.3FDI3.3.1FDIFDIFDIFDI[38]1978-19861987-19911992-20012002-2007WTO200820083.3.2FDIJ.H.1977[39]FDIFDIFDI3FDI18FDI3.32007FDIFDIFDIFDIFDI3.3FDIFig.3.3TheDistributionofFDIinEightEconomicZones1992-20073.41992-2007FDIFig.3.4TheChangeTrendofFDIinEightEconomicZones(1992-2007)FDI3.41992-2007FDI3FDI19FDIFDIFDIFDI2002“”FDIFDI3.4FDI19990.40.5GDP1992GDPGDPGDPGDPGDPFDIFDIFDIFDI4FDI204FDIFDIFDIFDIFDIFDI4.1FDIFDIFDI————————————4.2FDIFDIFDI4FDI21FDI4.1FDI)4.1FDIFig.4.1TheTransmissionMechanismofFDItoRegionalIncomeDisparity4.2.1FDIFDI[33]200788.3%20084FDI224.3%4.2%3.2%0.72——4.2.2FDIFDIFDI4.2.3FDIFDIFDIFDIFDI[39]FDIFDI4FDI23