您好,欢迎访问三七文档
当前位置:首页 > 行业资料 > 旅游娱乐 > 漓江流域生态旅游扶贫开发研究
广西师范大学硕士学位论文漓江流域生态旅游扶贫开发研究姓名:王军军申请学位级别:硕士专业:旅游管理指导教师:刘俊杰20080401I200530GDPIIAnti-povertyDevelopmentStudyofEco-tourisminLijiangRiverBasinName:WangJunjunTutor:LiuJunjieProf.Major:TourismManagementResearchdirection:RegionaltourismplanningGrade:2005AbstractThedevelopmentoftourismisbasedonthedevelopmentandutilizationofresources,withthetravelingdevelopmentcrazylyplunderingtheresourceswhichittoreliesonalong,thetourismindustrynolongerisinthepeopleimpression“thenon-pollutionindustry”.Intherecent30years,becauseofpursuingblindlytheeconomicefficiencyofthetourism,theenvironment,thesocietyandtheeconomyhavecreatedtheseverelyimpairinthetravelingdestination,andthereweresometourismpollutionaswellasphenomenonoftheecologydegenerationandtheoverloadingofresourcesduingtotravelling,butthesephenomenamostlyareoccurredinsomepoorareasfarawayofthetourismresourcesconcentrated,theinfrastructureandtheenvironmentalprotectioninvestmentseriouslyinsufficient.Therefore,formulatingandplanningthepracticalandfeasibletourismdevelopmentpatternisonekindofeffectiveprogrammesolvingtheeconomybackwardnessinthepoorareas,thiskindoftourismdevelopmentpatternrequestproperattentiontobotheconomicgrowthandecologicalenvironment'sbalancedrelations,thenmaintenancetourism'ssustainable.Obviously,theeco-tourismistheidealpatternwhichsatisfiesthisresult.Thisarticleexploringtheanti-povertydevelopmentpatternofeco-tourismwillchangesfinallythebackwardpresentsituationofthebasinresident,whichcaneliminatepovertybydeveloppingtheLijiangRiverbasinricheco-tourismresourceseandconomyprotectedly.Authorthinkthattheissueoneco-tourismpovertyreliefinvolvesmanytheoriesrelatedtoecnomicsandecologywhichincludessustainabledevelopmenttheory,econologytheory,travelingmultiplicatortheory,greenGDPtheoryandsoon.ThisarticleexploresonefeasiblewaytosuiteconomicdevelopmentoftheLijiangRiverbasinwiththeapplicationcorrelationtheoriesthroughconformitingLijiangRiverbasin'seco-tourismresourcesandunioningbasinresident'slifepresentsituation.Thearticleiscomposedroughlybythreeparts:ThefirstpartfirstlymakesthewholeanalysistotheLijiangRiverbasineco-tourismresources,andsummarizesthepresenttourismdevelopmentpsituationinbasin,andanalysisthesuperiorityandtheinsufficiencyoftourismdevelopmentinbasin;Againlyunderstandthebasinresident'slivingstandard,speciallytheLijiangRiverbasinpoorvillageresident'slifequestionthroghconsultingmaterialandinvestigatingandstudingonthespot,andcarriesonQuantitativeanalysisandQualitativeanalysiswiththecorrelationtheories,thenconductstherelevantresearchtoboth'srelations.IIIThesecondpartcarriesonthecaseanalysis.ThispartinvestigatesthepresentlifesituationanddegreeparticipatinginthelocaltourismdevelopmenttototheNewjiangVillagevillagerswholiveinbesideQingshitanecologyresortareaintheLijiangRiverbasinthroughinquiringsurvey'smethod,andanalyzestheLijiangRiverbasinstrickenpeopleincomesituationinthelocaltourismdevelopment,anddiscoversquestionwhichtheLijiangRiverbasineco-tourismdevelopmentexists.Itreflecttheeco-tourismstatusintheLijiangRiverbasinpovertyreliefdevelopmentandtheeconomicdevelopmentthroughthecaseanalysis,thushasevenmorestrengthenedthepattern'svalidityoftheLijiangRiverbasinanti-povertydevelopmentofeco-tourism..ThethirdpartproposessomecountermeasuresontheLijiangRiverbasinanti-povertydevelopmentofeco-tourism,andtheestablisheffectivepatternsuitingtheLijiangRiverbasinaiti-povertydevelopmetofeco-tourism.Keywords:LijiangRiverbasin;Eco-tourism;Anti-PovertyDevelopment;Countermeasure111111121UNWTO201010201512202016[1]202026.7%3%[2]415%-20%5921001372PPT“”“”2006200528638131130910457027111138286109112320802030%200668.75GDP619.1211%30%3%3%-11%5-719907.2319981.761990395199820161995412121Frechtling19741981WassenarFreachlingDeaden(1994)Poirier,R.A(1997)Mathieson.A.andWall.G.(1982),Knetsch,J.L(1963)AdrianBull19632080[3]GDP2060702080(niche)5,19994PPTPro-PoorTourismPPT2000(IIED)(ODI)CRT200146Enterprises(Goverment)(NGOs)(Donors)(Community)4PPTPPTPPT20027200286PovertyAlleviation20031228019901992199919991920002001200220012003GDP901996199719971999199671996(1998)199919992000212000(2003)2003200320042005200420042001,,,,,,82004,92212111997ecologicaltourism1965Higgins,19962070Miller,1989199519942080199919802080Thompson,1995[4]19651983[5]1198319872198610319904199251993619942122060208011199621222212050198742200021[6]1992122121[7]2119901993222multiplierRF1931[8]1319821991[9]directeffectsindirecteffectsinducedeffects1967[10]14123422320701980[11]15224GDPGDPGDPGDPGDPGDPGDPGDPGDPGDPGDPGDPGDPGDP163313111732m227km164km6050km25660km2[12]110°10′110°40′24°40′25°80′16050km2[13]2199817959km2320051745123-11831240.3m356.3m3196823.3m319633-877.5%5-637.7%1214.5%8.41998624147.70m19520.27m1915147.74m5200m3/s1952140.18m19893.8m3/s141.43m[14]18.8-19.17.828.3039.8-6105808.4-60321838-1941.5mm1377-1856.6mm76%300-309[15]313324131111966863925[16]1942123154.87%7818.53%11226.60%11323154.87%27818.53%86200263511226.60%2000199988.5%15936029514420400624[17]750090002001242100/196621/100300112122/7/222132001300211994198825114115635A71938800196680002150011
本文标题:漓江流域生态旅游扶贫开发研究
链接地址:https://www.777doc.com/doc-274341 .html