如何回复英文论文编辑部的修改意见Response-to-Editor-and-Reviewer

ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Ó¢ÎÄÂÛÎı༭²¿µÄÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼ûResponsetoEditorandReviewerÓ¢ÎÄÐ޸ĸå»Ø¸´ÐÅ£¬Ï£Íû¶Ô´ó¼ÒÓаïÖú1.DearProf.XXXX,ThankyouverymuchforyourletterandthecommentsfromtherefereesaboutourpapersubmittedtoXXXX(MSNumberXXXX).Wehavecheckedthemanuscriptandreviseditaccordingtothecomments.Wesubmitheretherevisedmanuscriptaswellasalistofchanges.Ifyouhaveanyquestionaboutthispaper,pleasedon¡¯thesitatetoletmeknow.Sincerelyyours,Dr.XXXXResponsetoReviewer1:Thanksforyourcommentsonourpaper.Wehaverevisedourpaperaccordingtoyourcomments:1.XXXXXXX2.XXXXXXX2.DearProfessor***,Re:An***RotatingRigid-flexibleCoupledSystem(No.:JSV-D-06-***)by***Manythanksforyouremailof24Jun2006,regardingtherevisionandadviceoftheabovepaperinJSV.Overallthecommentshavebeenfair,encouragingandconstructive.Wehavelearnedmuchfromit.Aftercarefullystudyingthereviewer¡¯commentsandyouradvice,wehavemadecorrespondingchangestothepaper.Ourresponseofthecommentsisenclosed.Ifyouneedanyotherinformation,pleasecontactmeimmediatelybyemail.Myemailaccountis***,andTel.is***,andFaxis+***.Yourssincerely,Detailedresponsetoreviewer¡¯scommentsandAsianEditor¡¯sadviceOverallthecommentshavebeenfair,encouragingandconstructive.Wehavelearnedmuchfromit.Althoughthereviewer¡¯scommentsaregenerallypositive,wehavecarefullyproofreadthemanuscriptandedititasfollowing.(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)Besidestheabovechanges,wehavecorrectedsomeexpressionerrors.Thankyouverymuchfortheexcellentandprofessionalrevisionofourmanuscript.3.Themanuscriptisrevisedsubmission(¡Á¡Á¡Á£­¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á)withnewlineandpagenumbersinthetext,somegrammarandspellingerrorshadalsobeencorrected.Furthermore,therelevantregulationshadbeenmadeintheoriginalmanuscriptaccordingtothecommentsofreviewers,andthemajorrevisedportionsweremarkedinredbold.Wealsorespondedpointbypointtoeachreviewercommentsaslistedbelow,alongwithaclearindicationofthelocationoftherevision.Hopethesewillmakeitmoreacceptableforpublication.ListofMajorChanges:1).........2).........3).........ResponsetoReviewers:1).........2).........3).........ResponsetoReviewerXXWeverymuchappreciatethecarefulreadingofourmanuscriptandvaluablesuggestionsofthereviewer.Wehavecarefullyconsideredthecommentsandhaverevisedthemanuscriptaccordingly.Thecommentscanbesummarizedasfollows:1)XX2)XXDetailedresponses1)XX2)XX4.DeareditorXXWehavereceivedthecommentsonourmanuscriptentitled¡°XX¡±byXX.Accordingtothecommentsofthereviewers,wehaverevisedourmanuscript.Therevisedmanuscriptandthedetailedresponsestothecommentsoftheonereviewerareattached.Sincerelyyours,XX5.ResponsetoReviewerAReviewerAverykindlycontactedmedirectly,andrevealedhimselftobeProfessorDr.Hans-GeorgGeissleroftheUniversityofLeipzig.IwrotehimageneralresponsetobothreviewsinJanuary2000,followedbytheseresponsestospecificpoints,bothhisown,andthoseoftheotherreviewer.ResponsetoSpecificPointsWhatfollowsisabriefandcursorydiscussionofthevariousissuesraisedbyyourselfandtheotherreviewer.Ifyoushouldreviseyourjudgmentofthevalidityofthetheory,thesepointswillbeaddressedatgreaterlengthinanewversionofthepaperthatIwouldresubmittoPsychologicalReview.ResponsetoSpecificPoints-ReviewerA:Inpart(1)ofyourcritiquethemajorcomplaintisthatnotheoryispresented,whichwasdiscussedabove.YoucontinueRegrettably,notmuchattentionisdrawntospecificdifferencesbetweenthechosenexamplesthatwouldbenecessarytopinpointspecificitiesofperceptionmoreprecisely,andifperceptualsystems,assuggested,hler(KindeedactonthebasisofHR,theremustbemanymorespecificconstraintsinvolvedtoensurespecial`veridicality'propertiesoftheperceptualoutcome,andthedifficultanalyticproblemsofconcretemodelingofperceptionarenoteventouched.Themodelaspresentedisnotamodelofvisionorauditionoranyotherparticularmodality,butisageneralmodeltoconfrontthealternativeneuralreceptivefieldparadigm,althoughexamplesfromvisualperceptionareusedtoexemplifytheprinciplesdiscussed.Themorespecificvisualmodelwassubmittedelsewhere,intheOrientationalHarmonicmodel,whereIshowedhowharmonicresonanceaccountsforspecificvisualillusoryeffects.Asdiscussedabove,theattempthereistoproposeageneralprincipleofneurocomputation,ratherthanaspecificmodelofvisual,auditory,oranyotherspecificsensorymodality.Again,whatIamproposingisaparadigmratherthanatheory,i.e.analternativeprincipleofneurocomputationwithspecificanduniqueproperties,asanalternativetotheneurondoctrineparadigmofthespatialreceptivefield.Ifthispaperiseventuallyacceptedforpublication,thenIwillresubmitmypapersonvisualillusoryphenomena,referringtothispapertojustifytheuseoftheunconventionalharmonicresonancemechanism.Inpart(2)(a)ofyourcritiqueyousayitisnotclarifiedwhetherthepostulatedpropertiesofGestaltsactuallyfollowfromthisdefinitionorpartlyderivefromadditionalconstraints.andIdoubtthatanyofthereviewedexamplesforHRcantreatjustthecaseofhler:(1961,p.7)Humanexperienceinthephenomenologicalsensecannotyetbetreatedwithourmostreliablemethods;andwhendealingwithit,wemaybeforcedtoformnewconceptswhichatfirst,willoftenbeabitvague.WolfgangKthedogcitedtodemonstrate`emergence'.Forthisahierarchyrelationisneeded.TheprincipleofemergenceinGestalttheoryisaverydiff