硕士论文答辩

AStudyofListeningComprehensionAnxietyofEnglishMajorStudentsinaVocationalCollegeDecember,2011BackgroundandSignificanceResearchDesignandFrameworkMajorFindingsImplicationsResearchInnovationsLimitationsandSuggestionsOutlineofthePresentationBackgroundandSignificance1.ThesignificanceofLCandtheinsufficientpreviousresearchesonlanguage-skillspecificanxietieslikeELA;2.ThedemandformoreelaborateELAstudiesinthevocationalcollegestudents,especiallyEnglishmajor;3.TheroleofcorrelationstudiesbetweenELAandLP,andothervariablesinFLLAresearches;4.ThedemandforfurthersuchstudiesfitfortheChinesestudentswithreliabilityandvalidly.backResearchPreparationLiteratureReviewResearchMethodologyResultsandDiscussionsResearchPreparationLiteratureReviewResearchMethodologyResultsandDiscussionsStudents’feedbackRationalesoflisteningcomprehensionTeachingpracticeScientificresearchesRationalesofforeignlanguageanxietyRationalesofforeignlanguageanxietyinlisteningResearchQuestionsInstrumentsSubjectsDatacollectionandanalysisprocedureResearchQuestionsback1.WhatisthegeneralstateofvocationalcollegeEnglishmajors’listeningcomprehensionanxiety?2.Whatistherelationshipbetweenthelisteninganxietyandthelisteningproficiency?3.WhatisthedifferenceofEnglishlisteninganxietybetweenthehighscoregroupandthelowscoregroup?4.WhatisthedifferenceintermsofEnglishlisteninganxietybetweenmaleandfemalestudents?Subjects158BusinessEnglishsophomoresofGrade2009inJiangxiCollegeofForeignStudies70malestudents88femalestudentsbackInstrumentsLPtestQuestionnaireListeningproficiencytest,CET4,December,2010BIQFLLAS(Kim,2000)Factor1:anxietyfromindividualcharacteristicsFactor2:tensionfromprocess-relatedcharacteristicsFactor3:stresscausedbylisteningmaterialsFactor4:listeningapprehensionincommunicationsituationsbackDescriptivestatisticsanalysisDataCollectionandAnalysisProcedurebackDataCollectionDataAnalysisQuestionnaireLPtestPearsonCorrelationanalysisIndependentsamplest-testanalysisSPSS10.0ResultsanddiscussionsMajorfindingsandimplications1.ThestateofELAinvocationalcollegeEnglishmajorsNPercentageMeanRangeMinimumMaximumLowanxiety5232.9%78.86325688Averageanxiety5534.8%95.691389102Highanxiety5132.3%110.2539103142Total158100%94.848656142OverviewofEnglishAnxietyLevelNMeanStd.DeviationRangeMinimumMaximumItem11583.35441.10634.001.005.00Item21583.01901.05564.001.005.00Item31582.9684.97374.001.005.00Item41583.8418.73603.002.005.00Item51583.2215.96844.001.005.00Item61583.0316.84023.002.005.00Item71583.8481.97214.001.005.00Item81581.9620.73053.001.004.00Item91582.3418.91534.001.005.00Item101582.9241.95474.001.005.00Item111582.6266.96094.001.005.00Item121582.5759.73404.001.005.00Item131582.37341.01884.001.005.00Item141582.8354.71264.001.005.00Item151583.1709.95234.001.005.00Item161583.32281.06644.001.005.00Item171582.7722.82093.002.005.00Item181583.2405.90604.001.005.00Item191582.25951.08954.001.005.00Item201581.89241.15434.001.005.00Item211582.6392.96584.001.005.00Item221582.42411.04244.001.005.00Item231583.37341.07364.001.005.00Item241583.2848.93824.001.005.00Item251583.4241.91903.002.005.00Item261582.6519.95724.001.005.00Item271582.5063.97584.001.005.00Item281582.55701.00634.001.005.00Item291582.7025.83333.001.004.00Item301583.0570.89053.001.004.00Item311583.1139.93744.001.005.00Item321582.68991.16704.001.005.00Item331582.83541.12224.001.005.00AverageLevel1582.8740----DescriptiveStatisticsofEachIteminFLLAS2.TherelationshipbetweenELAandLP2.1ELAandLPNPercentageMeanStd.DeviationRangeMin.Max.HighProficiency5434.2%86.5413.134650.0056.00106.00AverageProficiency6038.0%94.2211.464251.0064.00115.00LowProficiency4427.8%105.8912.507156.0086.00142.00ListeningAnxietyandListeningProficiencyCorrelationsbetweenListeningAnxietyandListeningProficiency1.000-.611**..00013584.94-12886.586.528-82.080158158-.611**1.000.000.-12886.532739.04-82.080208.529158158PearsonCorrelationSig.(2-tailed)SumofSquaresandCross-productsCovarianceNPearsonCorrelationSig.(2-tailed)SumofSquaresandCross-productsCovarianceNListeningProficiencyListeningAnxietyProficiencyAnxietyCorrelationissignificantatthe0.01level**.(2-tailed).2.2AnxietyfactorsandLPCorrelationAnalysisbetweenAnxietyFactorsandLPF1F2F3F4LPF1PearsonCorrelation1.000.620**.571**.561**-.439**Sig.(2-tailed).000.000.000.000N158158158158158F2PearsonCorrelation.620**1.000.644**.490**-.641**Sig.(2-tailed).000.000.000.000N158158158158158F3PearsonCorrelation.571**.644**1.000.359**-.466**Sig.(2-tailed).000.000.000.000N158158158158158F4PearsonCorrelation.561**.490**.359**1.000-.391**Sig.(2-tailed).000.000.000.000N158158158158158LPPearsonCorrelation-.439**-.641**-.466**-.391**1.000Sig.(2-tailed).000.000.000.000N158158158158158**correlationissignificantatthe0.01level(2-tailed).3.ELAbetweenthehighscoregroupandthelowscoregroupIndependentSamplesT-TestforELAandELAFactorsbetweentheHighScoreGroupandtheLowScoreGroupGroupNMeanStd.DeviationtdfpF1HighScore5428.394.1908-5.94896.000LowScore4434.235.5232F2HighScore5425.135.1544-7.15796.000LowScore4432.735.3150F3HighScore5428.204.6960-5.06696.000LowScore4432.733.9963F4Hig