超限高层小震设计与中震设计的对比分析

4010201010赵明,于海博,毛英杰,龙淼,王晓洁(,200002)[],,,,,[];;;Comparativeanalysisofseismicdesignbetweensmallandmediumearthquakeforsuperhigh-risebuildingsZhaoMing,YuHaibo,MaoYingjie,LongMiao,WangXiaojie(EastChinaArchitecturalDesign&ResearchInstituteCo.,Ltd.,Shanghai200002,China)Abstract:Ant-iseismicgradeofsuperhigh-risebuildingsisalwaysgradeIorextragradeI.Higherant-iseismicgradeleadsbiggeradjustmentcoefficientofinternalforce,whichmakesdesignvaluesofinternalforceundersmallearthquakebeevenmorethanthoseundermediumearthquake.Comparativeanalysisofinternalforceunderdifferentseismicfortificationlevelswasdoneanddesignproposalinseismicdesignwasgiven,whichcangivereferenceforrealizingperformance-basedseismicdesign.Keywords:superhigh-risebuilding;elasticdesignundermediumearthquake;non-yieldingdesignundermediumearthquake;performance-basedseismicdesign:,,,Email:[e-mail]0,(),(),(),110;110;[1],,,1,,,/0,,,1114115--11681180---114-11681131131131131121101131121101161111191131131131131,,,,113,114,114,114@114@113=2155(,),116()119(),19(),221182215521183167119521732134319311561130116911561130210811432147233,218,218,,(,110),,,[2]4321836771588159()010401080112011601240132()0111012301340145016801902175218821832181218321814110()110()(CRE)5141251412110()5141151411110(),218P113=2115,(114),(CRE018),218P113P114P018=1192,,2185,5:(1),,;,(2),;,,,5:,,()51182(1156)2155(1130)()1192(1130)2173(2108)2118(1169)3167(1156)()2134(1143)3193(2147)1192218:4,,:(1),:,(50)201P760,0,,,1P1290,4,:(1),,,(2),,,,(3),,(4),,,,/0,(5),(6),100,5010,,,,,(7),,,,[1],,,.[R].:,2009.[2]GB50009)2001[S].:,2002.[3]GB50011)2001[S].:,2001.[4][R].:,2007.[5][R].:,2008.[6],,,.[J].,2010,40(2):13-16.[7],.[R].:,2008.[8]ASCEPSEC41-46SeismicRehabilitationofExistingBuildings[S].USA:AmericanSocietyofCivilEngineers,2007.[9],,,.[J].,2009,31(5):74-80.[10],,,.-[J].,2010,29(6):134-139.[11]ATCDesignGuide1,MinimizingFloorVibration[S].USA:AppliedTechnologyCouncil,1999.(20)(2),,,:,,,(3),,,,,[1]JGJ3)2002[S].:,2002.[2],.[J].,2008,24(6):1-5.[3],.[J].,2009,39(2):1-7.50