您好,欢迎访问三七文档
当前位置:首页 > 商业/管理/HR > 质量控制/管理 > CMSATLAS探测器对比
K.JakobsVorlesungPhysikanHadron-Collidern,Freiburg,SS20112.5ImportantdifferencesbetweentheATLASandCMSdetectorsTheATLASdetectorconceptCMSDetectorConceptTrackerCalorimeterCoilMuonDetectorandironreturnyokeCMSMUONBARRELCALORIMETERSPixelsSiliconMicrostrips210m2ofsiliconsensors9.6MchannelsECAL76kscintillatingPbWO4crystalsCathodeStripChambers(CSC)ResistivePlateChambers(RPC)DriftTubeChambers(DT)ResistivePlateChambers(RPC)SuperconductingCoil,4TeslaIRONYOKETRACKERMUONENDCAPSHCALPlasticscintillator/brasssandwichTotalweight12500tOveralldiameter15mOveralllength21.6mHowhugeareATLASandCMS?Sizeofdetectors:-Volume:20000m3forATLAS-Weight:12500tonsforCMS-66to80millionpixelreadoutchannelsnearvertex-200m2ofactivesiliconforCMStracker-175000readoutchannelsforATLASLArEMcalorimeter-1millionchannelsand10000m2areaofmuonchambers-Veryselectivetrigger/DAQsystem-Large-scaleofflinesoftwareandworldwidecomputing(GRID)Time-scale:Morethan25yearsfromfirstconceptualstudies(Lausanne1984)tosolidphysicsresultsin2011confirmingthatLHChastakenoverthehigh-energyfrontierfromtheTevatronATLASCMSMagneticfield2Tsolenoid+toroid:0.5T(barrel),1T(endcap)4Tsolenoid+returnyokeTrackerSiliconpixelsandstrips+transitionradiationtracker/pT510-4pT+0.01Siliconpixelsandstrips(fullsilicontracker)/pT1.510-4pT+0.005EMcalorimeterLiquidargon+Pbabsorbers/E10%/E+0.007PbWO4crystals/E3%/E+0.003HadroniccalorimeterFe+scintillator/Cu+LAr(10)/E50%/E+0.03GeVBrass+scintillator(7+catcher)/E100%/E+0.05GeVMuon/pT2%@50GeVto10%@1TeV(InnerTracker+muonsystem)/pT1%@50GeVto10%@1TeV(InnerTracker+muonsystem)TriggerL1+HLT(L2+EF)L1+HLT(L2+L3)ImportantdifferencesI:•InordertomaximizethesensitivityforHdecays,theexperimentsneedtohaveanexcellente/identificationandresolution•CMS:hasoptedforahighresolutionPbWO4crystalcalorimeter-higherintrinsicresolution•ATLAS:Liquidargoncalorimeter-highgranularityandlongitudinallysegmentation(bettere/ID)-electricalsignals,highstabilityincalibration&radiationresistantBackCellMiddleCellStripCellATLAS/CMS:e/resolutionsPhotonsat100GeVATLAS:1-1.5%energyresol.(all)CMS:0.8%energyresol.(~70%)Electronsat50GeVATLAS:1.3-2.3%energyresol.(useEMcaloonly)CMS:~2.0%energyresol.(combineEMcaloandtracker)•Activesensorsandmechanicsaccounteachonlyfor~10%ofmaterialbudget•Needtobring70kWpowerintotrackerandtoremovesimilaramountofheat•Verydistributedsetofheatsourcesandpower-hungryelectronicsinsidevolume:thishasledtocomplexlayoutofservices,mostofwhichwerenotatallunderstoodatthetimeoftheTDRsAmountofmaterialinATLASandCMSinnertrackersLEPdetectorsWeight:4.5tonsWeight:3.7tonsImportantdifferencesII:•Innerdetectors/trackerBothusesolenoidalfieldsATLAS:2TeslaCMS:4Tesla•CMS:fullsiliconstripandpixeldetectors-highresolution,highgranularity•ATLAS:Silicon(stripsandpixels)+TransitionRadiationTracker-highgranularityandresolutionclosetointeractionregion-“continuous”trackingatlargeradiiK.JakobsVorlesungPhysikanHadron-Collidern,Freiburg,SS2011-PerformanceofCMStrackerisundoubtedlysuperiortothatofATLASintermsofmomentumresolution.-Vertexingandb-taggingperformancesaresimilar.-However,impactofmaterialandB-fieldalreadyvisibleonefficiencies.MainperformancecharacteristicsoftheATLASandCMStrackersImportantdifferencesIII:•Coil/Hadroncalorimeters•CMS:electromagneticcalorimeterandpartofthehadroniccalorimeter(7)insidethesolenoidalcoil+tailcatcher,returnyokegoodfore/resolutionbadforjetresolution•ATLAS:calorimetryoutsidecoil11ATLASHadronicabsorptionlengthofthecalorimetersK.JakobsVorlesungPhysikanHadron-Collidern,Freiburg,SS201111CMSK.JakobsVorlesungPhysikanHadron-Collidern,Freiburg,SS2011BiggestdifferenceinperformanceperhapsforhadroniccalorimetryETmissatET=2000GeVATLAS:~20GeVCMS:~40GeVThismaybeimportantforhighmassH/AJetsat1000GeVATLAS:~2%energyresolutionCMS:~5%energyresolution,Butexpectsizableimprovementusingtracks(especiallyatlowerE)ImportantdifferencesIV:•Muonspectrometer•ATLAS:independentmuonspectrometer;excellentstand-alonecapabilities•CMS:superiorcombinedmomentumresolutioninthecentralregion;limitedstand-aloneresolutionandtriggercapabilities(multiplescatteringintheiron)CMSmuonperformancedrivenbytracker:betterthanATLASat~0;ATLASmuonstand-aloneperformanceexcellentoverwholerangeHowtoSelectInterestingEvents?Bunchcrossingrate:40MHz,~20interactionsperBX(109evts/s)canonlyrecord~200event/s(1.5MBeach),still300MB/sdatarateNeedhighlyefficientandhighlyselectiveTRIGGERraweventdata(70TB/s)arestoredinpipelineuntiltriggerdecisionATLAStriggerhas3levels(CMSsimilarwith2levels)Level-1:hardware,~3sdecisiontime,40MHz100kHzLevel-2:software,~40msdecisiontime,100kHz2kHzLevel-3:software,~4sdecisiontime,2kHz200HztrashsavePIPELINENOYEStrigger109evts/s102evts/sDetectorLHCdatahandling,GRIDcomputingTriggersystemselects~200“collisions”persec.LHCdatavolumeperyear:10-15Petabytes=10-151015ByteConcorde(15Km)Balloon(30Km)CDstackwith1yearLHCdata!(~20Km)Mt.Blanc(4.8Km)LCG/EGEE/OSGe-ScienceGridisinproduction:World-wideCoverageOver200sites20’000CPUsMult
本文标题:CMSATLAS探测器对比
链接地址:https://www.777doc.com/doc-412307 .html