SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全

晴儿晴儿SCI修改稿回答審稿人意見範文模板大全修改稿回答審稿人の意見（最重要の部分）ListofResponsesDearEditorsandReviewers:Thankyouforyourletterandforthereviewers’commentsconcerningourmanuscriptentitled“PaperTitle”(ID:文章稿號).Thosecommentsareallvaluableandveryhelpfulforrevisingandimprovingourpaper,aswellastheimportantguidingsignificancetoourresearches.Wehavestudiedcommentscarefullyandhavemadecorrectionwhichwehopemeetwithapproval.Revisedportionaremarkedinredinthepaper.Themaincorrectionsinthepaperandtherespondstothereviewer’scommentsareasflowing:Respondstothereviewer’scomments:Reviewer#1:1.Responsetocomment:(……簡要列出意見……)Response:××××××2.Responsetocomment:(……簡要列出意見……)Response:××××××。。。。。。逐條意見回答，切忌一定不能有遺漏針對不同の問題有下列幾個禮貌術語可適當用用：Weareverysorryforournegligenceof……...Weareverysorryforourincorrectwriting……...晴儿晴儿ItisreallytrueasReviewersuggestedthat……WehavemadecorrectionaccordingtotheReviewer’scomments.Wehavere-writtenthispartaccordingtotheReviewer’ssuggestionAsReviewersuggestedthat……ConsideringtheReviewer’ssuggestion,wehave……最後特意感謝一下這個審稿人の意見：Specialthankstoyouforyourgoodcomments.Reviewer#2:同上述Reviewer#3:××××××Otherchanges:1.Line60-61,thestatementsof“……”werecorrectedas“…………”2.Line107,“……”wasadded3.Line129,“……”wasdeleted××××××Wetriedourbesttoimprovethemanuscriptandmadesomechangesinthemanuscript.Thesechangeswillnotinfluencethecontentandframeworkofthepaper.Andherewedidnotlistthechangesbutmarkedinredinrevisedpaper.WeappreciateforEditors/Reviewers’warmworkearnestly,andhopethatthecorrectionwillmeetwithapproval.Onceagain,thankyouverymuchforyourcommentsandsuggestions晴儿晴儿以下是審稿人意見和本人の回複。與大家分享。從中可以看出，這位審稿人認真讀了文章，提出很多寶貴の意見。這些意見分布在文章の各個地方。我很詫異有人真正讀了我の文章。看到這些意見，我覺得很感激，不是因為接收文章の原因，而是這些意見能真正有助於提高文章の質量。從中還看出，回答審稿人問題の“技巧”。對於回答問題，有の人就是一味反駁，卻不加改進。記得ACSStyleGuide裏面說，當審稿人問到問題の，哪怕是他理解錯誤，這也說明作者這麼寫，其他讀者也會理解錯誤，引起歧義。因此，作者就是要修改句子，使表達不引起歧義。因此：有時間一味反駁，還不如指出具體改進在第幾頁、第幾段。============================================Reviewers'comments:Reviewer#3:Whilerevisingthescript,itistobesuggestedthatauthorshouldclearlyindicatetheaim&scopeofthestudyandwhilemakingconclusion,itistobementionedhowthestudyisusefulforthepracticalpurposes.Inadditionthefollowingarethefewsuggestions/comments,whichmaybeincludedwhilerevision.1.Introductionpartfirstparalastline,authormustavoidtowriteambiguousstatementi.e.,muchworkisstillahead,mayindicateproperly.晴儿晴儿2.Authorcouldnotdemonstratethereasonwhy,toselecttheorganiccompoundsuchasethylpyruvateforthisstudy?3.Experimentalpart:Itisdifficulttounderstandthein-situRAIRSexperimentswithhomemadeliquid-solidRAIRScell.Moredetailedinformationmaybeusefulfortheothersthosewhoareworkinginthearea.Photographoftheassembledcellmaybeincluded.4.Thedescriptiongivenfortheexperimentalsetup(page4)canbepresentedbyflowdiagraminstead,asaneasetounderstandthesetup.5.ReslutsPart(Page6):COadlayerswithidenticalmonolayercoverages,themonolayercoverage,isitbeenperformedwithsomeadsorptionmodel?Further,itwassuggestedthatCO-saturatedPtsurface,butnotmentionedaboutthesaturationexperiments.Isitobtainedafter60minofCObubbling?6.Page12,2ndpara:ThedisplacementofEtPybyCCl4flushing,isitconfirmedbytheEtPypeaks?Ifso,ithastobementionedclearlyinthepara.Alsointhesamepara,authorreferredforFig.7aand7bbutinthefigures,itdidn'tappear,onlyfigure7appeared.Ifeelitrefersforfigure7,portionAandB,tobecorrected.Similarly,inthetextreferredthefig2a,2b.etcbutonthefiguresheetitismentionedas2A,2B.etc.tobecorrected.7.Page14,1stpara:'contaminationofthePtsurfacebycorrosionofo-ringsinhighconcentrationEtPy',butthestatementhasnotbeensupportedbyotherevidence/literature.8.Pages14through17:theobservedreactivityofvarioussolventsforadsorbed晴儿晴儿COonthePtsurface(figs3&4)hastobediscussedmoreprecisely.Thisreviewerisunabletofollowthereasonwhytheyshoweddifferentreactivity,isitprincipallyduetotheorganicmoieties,orduetotheimpuritiesofcommerciallyavailablechemicalsoramixedeffect.Ithastobeclearlydemonstrated,however,theonlyexperimentperformedwithCO/water?CCl4woulddifficulttodescribeitindetail.9.Theauthortrytorestrainwithrepeatedargumentsinthetexte.g.,page3para1:Itwasgeneralizedthat.........,alsoappearedonpage21firstpara.10.Captionsofthefiguresaretoolong,thedetaileddescriptionalreadygiveninthetext,hencewouldnotbeincludedhere.Captionsshouldbeshortandcrispy.===============================================DearEditor,Iquiteappreciateyourfavoriteconsiderationandthereviewer’sinsightfulcomments.NowIhaverevisedtheJCIS-06-247exactlyaccordingtothereviewer’scomments,andfoundthesecommentsareveryhelpful.Ihopethisrevisioncanmakemypapermoreacceptable.Therevisionswereaddressedpointbypointbelow.[general]TheobjectiveofthisresearchwasaddedatthebeginningofthethirdparagraphofIntroduction.HowthestudyisusefulforpracticalpurposeswasaddedattheendofConclusionasoneparagraph.[1]Ambiguousstatementi.e.,“muchworkisstillahead”wasdeleted.晴儿晴儿[2]Ethylpyruvatewasusedhereasatypicalcompound(containingtwocarbonylgroups)todemonstratethefeasibilityofusingourdiagnosingtooltodetectlow-coverageCO(comingfromdecarbonylationofEtPy)attheliquid-solidinterface.EtPyisareactantusedinliquid-phasechiralcatalysis,andslightd