您好,欢迎访问三七文档
PrieandCapaityCompetitionofMake-To-OrderFirms1HongChen2FaultyofCommereandBusinessAdministration,UBC,CanadaYat-wahWan3DepartmentofIndustrialEngineeringandEngineeringManagementHKUST,ClearWaterBay,Kowloon,HongKongAbstratInthispaper,weonsiderthe(non-ooperative)ompetitionofaduopolyofmake-to-order rms,eahmodeledbyanM/M/1queue.The rmspostthepriestheyhargeforservie.Knowingtheexpetedrewardandtheexpetedwaitingtimeateah rm,potentialustomershooseeithertoreeiveservieatoneofthe rmsortoseekanalternativeopportunitybymaximizingtheirexpetednetrewards.Weonsiderboththeshort-runompetitionandthelong-runompetition.Intheshortrun,theservieapaitiesofboth rmsaregiven,andthe rmsmaximizetheirexpetedrevenuesbyhoosingpriesonly.Inthelongrun,the rmsmaximizetheirexpetedpro tsbyhoosingbothpriesandservieapaities.Intheshortrun,aNashequilibriummaynotexist,andwhenitexits,itmaynotbeunique.Givenallelsebeingthesame,a rmwithalargerapaity,orahighervalueofservieoralowerostofwaitinganhargeapriepremiumandtakealargermarketshare.The rmsmayeitherraiseoruttheiroptimalpries,inresponsetoaninreaseintheirservieapaity,eventhoughahigherservieapaityalwaysleadstoashorterexpetedwaitingtime.The rmsmayhaveeitherahigheroraloweroptimalprieforahigherunitostofwaiting.Inthespeialaseofhomogeneous(oridential) rms,theequilibriumalwaysexists.Intheshortrun,notallpotentialustomersareserved,butinthelongrun,allpotentialustomerswillbeservedunlessnoneofthe rmshoosetoenterthemarket.Currentversion:November20001WeareindebtedtoMurrayFrankforthehelpfulonversationandomments.ApreliminaryversionofthispaperhasappearedasChen,etal(2000).2SupportedinpartbyanNSERC(Canada)researhgrantandaRGC(HongKong)researhgrant.3SupportedinpartbyaRGC(HongKong)researhgrant.1IntrodutionWiththeadvanementininformationinfrastruture,theollaborationofdi erentlevelsinsupplyhains,andtheemergeneofe-ommere,moreandmore rmsareadoptingthemake-to-order(MTO)mode.Firmsoperatinginsuhamodestarttoprodueonlyafteranorderisplaed.Anewlyplaedorderanbe lledonlyaftertheurrentorderandallpreviousordersareprodued(ifa rst-in- rst-outdisiplineisinplae).Consequently,thereisalwaysalead-timebetweentheplaementofanorderandthereeiptofgoods.Inthe erelyompetitivebusinessworld,whenmakingpriedeisions,MTO rmsmustantiipatethe(expeted)ostofdelaystheirustomerswouldusetovaluetheprodutorservie.Theinterationbetween rmsandustomersgivesrisetoamulti-levelmulti-playergame:Customersshoparoundinamarketto ndthe rmthatprovidesthebestexpetednetreward(whihisthevalueofprodutorservieminustheprieandtheexpetedwaitingost).Atthesametime,tomaximizetheirownbene ts, rmsreattothebehaviorofustomersandtheationsoftheirompetitors.Intheshortrun,apaitiesof rmsarerelatively xedandhene rmsompetebypostingattrativepriestoinreasetheir(expeted)revenue.Inthelongrun, rmsanmakebothservie(orprodution)apaityandpriedeisions.Whenmakingthepriedeision,the rmhastobalanebetweenattratingmoreustomerswithalongerexpetedwaitingtimeandattratinglessustomerswithashorterexpetedwaitingtime.Inthispaper,weonsidertheompetitionbetweentwoheterogeneousmake-to-order rms.Eah rmismodeledbyanM/M/1queue.The rmspostthepriestheyhargeforservie.PotentialustomerarrivalsfollowaPoissonproess.Knowingtheprieandtheexpetedwaitingtimeateah rm,eahpotentialustomermaximizeshisexpetednetrewardbyhoosinga rmtoreeiveservie(ifatall)orbytakinganalternativeopportunity.Intheshortrun,theservieapaitiesofboth rmsaregivenandthe rmsmaximizetheirexpetedrevenuesbyhoosingpriesonly.Inthelongrun,the rmshoosebothservieapaitiesandpries.WeareinterestedinestablishingtheexisteneofaNashequilibriumandstudyinghowtheequilibrium(whenexists)varieswiththe rmharateristis.Thequeueinge etinprie-timeompetitionwas rststudiedintheseminalworkofNaor(1969).Heonsideredamonopolyinwhihustomersouldobservetheexistingqueuelengthbeforedeidingtojoinorbalk.Heshowedthatthesoialoptimality,theindividualoptimalityofustomers,andthemaximalbene tofthe rmdonotalignwitheahother,andtoregulateustomersbehavior,themonopolisti rmwouldgenerallysettoohighaprie.Naor’sworkhasmotivatedotherresearherstostudyonsumer’sbehaviorandthesoialeÆienyofamonopoly;see,forexample,Knudsen(1972),EdelsonandHildebrand(1975),DeVany(1976),LippmanandStidham(1977),Hassin(1986),andChenandFrank(1994).Theintegrityofustomersaddsinanewdimensionwhentherearemultiplelassesofustomersandthe rmannothekthelassidentityofustomers.MendelsonandWhang(1990)onsideredmultiplelassesofustomersinwhihustomersmightheattheirlassidentities.Theygavesoiallyoptimalprioritypriingshemes(namelyinentive-ompatibleshemes)thatinduedustomerstorevealtheirtruelassidenti ation.ExtensionsofthisworkinludeRaoandPetersen(1996),Bradford(1996)andVanMieghem(1999).Naturallyduopolyisonsideredinprie-timeompetition.Luski(1976)onsideredPoisson1arrivalstoamarketoftwoidentialexponentialservie rmsandanoutsideopportunity.Cus-tomerspaidaprieandthewaitingostandearnedarewardiftheyjoinedtheservieofeither rm.Hefoundthattheequilibriumpriesofthe rmsouldbedi erentiftheyoperatedintheooperativemode.Noompletesolutionwasfoundwhenthe rmsworkednon-ooperatively;heouldonly ndneessaryonditionsfor
本文标题:Price and Capacity Competition of Make-To-Order Fi
链接地址:https://www.777doc.com/doc-4614315 .html