您好,欢迎访问三七文档
当前位置:首页 > 商业/管理/HR > 信息化管理 > QSA供应商体系自评表
DateDescriptionofRevisionRevisedByRev.使用注意事項:CautionsforUse:ReversionHistory1.Item前加註``*``項目為特別關注項目;只要一項不符,QSA即為不合格。Theitemmarkedwith*aheadmeansthatitneedstobespeciallynoticed.Ifanyofthemisjudgedasincompliant,thentheQSAshallbedeemedasFail.2.Item前加註``*``項目為TS工具,品質和環安系統,GP管理必須項目;Theitemmarkedwith*aheadmeansthattheTStool,quality,ESHSystemandGPmanagementmustbeexecuted.QualitysystemAuditSummaryFormNo.:AUOJM-17-001-002(v.7)Page/TotalPages:1/26Supplier:FactoryLocation:No.SECTIONSelfActual%SIXXONActual%Goal%1QualitySystems品質系統#DIV/0!#DIV/0!70%100%2ContractReview合約讅查#DIV/0!#DIV/0!70%100%3DesignControl設計管制#DIV/0!#DIV/0!70%100%4DocumentationControl文件管制#DIV/0!#DIV/0!70%100%5SupplierQualityControl供應商品質控制#DIV/0!#DIV/0!70%100%6ProductID&LotTraceability產品識別與追溯#DIV/0!#DIV/0!70%100%7ProcessControl製程管制#DIV/0!#DIV/0!70%100%8InspectionandTest檢驗與測試#DIV/0!#DIV/0!70%100%9Calibration校正#DIV/0!#DIV/0!70%100%10NonconformingProductControl不合格品管制#DIV/0!#DIV/0!70%100%11QualityRecords品質記錄#DIV/0!#DIV/0!70%100%12Handling,Packaging,Storage&Delivery操作,包裝,貯存及運送方式#DIV/0!#DIV/0!70%100%13FMEA&CP&SPC&MSA失效模式分析,管制計畫,統計-製程管制及量測系統確認#DIV/0!#DIV/0!70%100%14GPControl綠色管理#DIV/0!#DIV/0!85%100%OverallAverage(%)#DIV/0!#DIV/0!85%Criteria:Approved85~100%Result#DIV/0!NotApproved85%单项的评分不能低于70分,GPControl不能低於85分AuditDate:SIXXONAuditor:QualitySystems品質系統ContractReview合約讅查DesignControl設計管制DocumentationControl文件管制SupplierQualityControl供應商品質控制ProductID&LotTraceability產品識別與追溯ProcessControl製程管制InspectionandTest檢驗與測試Calibration校正NonconformingProductControl不合格品管制QualityRecords品質記錄Handling,Packaging,Storage&Delivery操作,包裝,貯存及運…FMEA&CP&SPC&MSA失效模式分析,管制…GPControl綠色管理QualitysystemAuditSummaryFormNo.:AUOJM-17-001-002(v.7)Page/TotalPage2/261:QualitySystemRequirements#DIV/0!SIXXONAvgScore:#DIV/0!0Counts:0Subtotal:0Subtotals:0Y=1N=0N/A=xY=1N=0N/A=xRemarks1.11.21.31.41.51.61.71.81.91.101.111.12Doesthesupplierconductinternalauditsatplannedintervals?供應商是否以計劃的期間執行内部稽核?Hasthesupplierappointedamanagementrepresentativewhohasresponsibilityandauthorityforensuringthataqualitymanagementsystemhasbeenimplementedandmaintained?(includinggreenproductmanagementsystem)供應商是否任命一名管理代表並授予責任和權限以確保品質管理系統被執行和維持(包含綠色產品管理系統)?Hasthemanagementrepresentativetrackedanddrovetheimprovementonqualitymanagementsystemperformancewithrecord/report?管理代表是否使用紀錄或報告追蹤和推進品質管理系統的改善?Hasthesupplierdefinedtheresponsibility,authorityandinterrelationofallpersonnelwhomanage,performandverifyworkthataffectsthequalityofproducts,materialsorservices?(i.e.procedures,organizationcharts,qualitymanual)供應商是否定義會影響產品/物料/服務品質之所有管理/執行/驗證人員的責任/權限/相互關係?(比如程序,組織圖,品質手冊)Hasthesupplierprovidedadequateresourcesforin-houseverificationactivitiessuchasinspection,testing,monitoringandreviewofprocessesandproducts?供應商是否提供足夠的資源來支持内部的驗證活動,如檢驗,測試,監控及產品和製程的檢討?Doesthequalitymanualincludethescopeofthequalitymanagementsystem,includingdetailsofandjustificationforanyexclusions?品質手冊是否包含品質系統的範圍(包括任何排外項目的細節和正當性)?Doesthequalitymanualincludeadescriptionoftheinteractionbetweentheprocessesofthequalitymanagementsystem?品質手冊是否針對品質管理系統的不同流程之間相互作用進行表述?Arequantifiableandmeasurablequalityobjectives,includingthosetomeetrequirementsforproduct,establishedatrelevantfunctionsandlevelswithintheorganization?是否在組織的相關職能和級別建立可量化可測量的品質目標(包括滿足產品需求的目標)?Doesthequalitymanagementsystemdocumentationincludeaqualitymanual?品質管理系統文件是否含有品質手冊?(b)DoestheQualityPolicyprovideaframeworkforestablishingandreviewingqualityobjectives?品質政策是否提供一個建立和檢討品質目標的架構?(c)IstheQualityPolicycommunicatedandunderstoodwithintheorganization?品質政策是否在組織内被溝通和了解?SelfAvgScore:Counts:Hasthesupplierdefinedanddocumenteditscorporatequalitypolicy?供應商是否定義和文件化其品質政策?SIXXONScoreSelfScoreQualitySyetemAuditSummaryFormNo.:AUOJM-17-001-002(v.7)Page/TotalPages3/26QualitySyetemAuditSummary1.131.141.151.161.171.181.191.201.211.221.23Doesthemanagementreviewsincludeverificationofthefollowinginput:(a)Achievementofqualityobjectives;(b)Resultsoftheaudits;(c)Customerfeedback;(d)Processperformanceandproductconformity;(e)Statusofpreventiveandcorrectiveactions;(g)Changesthatcouldaffectthequalitymanagementsystem;(h)Recommendationsforimprovement管理審查是否確認如下事項:(a)品質目標的達成狀況?(b)各種稽核的結果?(c)客戶回饋?(d)流程的績效和產品的符合性?(e)預防和矯正措施的狀況(f)以往管理審查的跟蹤措施(g)可能影響品質管理系統的變更(h)改善的建議?Doestheoutputofmanagementreviewsincludeanydecisionsandactionsrelatedto:(a)Improvementoftheeffectivenessofthequalitymanagementsystemanditsprocess?;(b)Improvementofproductrelatedtocustomerrequirements;(c)Resourceneeds管理審查的輸出是否包括下列相關的決議和對策:(a)品質管理系統及其流程有效性的改善?(b)與客戶要求相關的產品的改善?;(c)資源需求?Aretheauditresultsanalyzedforimprovementfromasystemlevel?針對稽核的結果是否從系統水準進行分析改善?Doesthesupplierconductmanagementreviewsofthesuitabilityandeffectivenessofthequalitymanagementsystematappropriateintervals?(i.e.doesthequalitysystemmeetcustomerrequirements?)供應商是否在適當的周期内執行針對品質管理系統之適宜性和有效性的管理審查?(如:品質系統是否滿足客戶需求)Isthereaproceduredocumentedtheresponsibilitiesandrequirementsforplanningandconductingaudits,andforreportingresultsandmaintainingrecords?是否有文件化的程序定義稽核規劃和執行及報告結果和維持紀錄的職責和要求?Dothefollowupactivitiesincludetheverificationoftheactionstaken
本文标题:QSA供应商体系自评表
链接地址:https://www.777doc.com/doc-5696536 .html