您好,欢迎访问三七文档
TheEvolutionofPortfolioRulesandtheCapitalAssetPricingModelEmanuelaSciubba¤FacultyofEconomicsandPoliticsUniversityofCambridgeJuly1998AbstractTheaimofthispaperistotesttheperformanceofthestandardversionofCAPMinanevolutionaryframework.Weimagineahet-erogeneouspopulationoflong-livedagentswhoinvesttheirwealthaccordingtodi¤erentportfoliorulesandweaskwhatisthefateofthosewhohappentobehaveasprescribedbyCAPM.Inacompletesecuritiesmarketwithaggregateuncertainty,weprovethattraderswhoeitherbelieveinCAPManduseitasaruleofthumb,orareen-dowedwithgenuinemean-variancepreferences,undersomeveryweakconditions,vanishinthelongrun.Weshowthatasu¢cientcondi-tiontodriveCAPMormeanvariancetraderswealthsharestozeroisthataninvestorendowedwithalogarithmicutilityfunctionentersthemarket.We nallychecktherobustnessofourresultsallowingfordi¤erentkindsofheterogeneityamongtraders.JELClassi cationC61,D81,G11KeywordsEvolution;portfoliorules;CAPM;Kellycriterion.AddressforCorrespondenceEmanuelaSciubba,LucyCavendishCollege,CB30BUCambridge,UK.E-mail:es204@econ.cam.ac.uk¤IamdeeplyindebtedtoLucaAnderliniforhishelpfulguidance.Ialsobene tedfromdiscussionwithRobertEvansandPeterSorensen.UsefulcommentscamefromparticipantstotheSt.JohnsTheoryWorkshops,UniversityofCambridge,andtotheThirdInternationalConferenceonComputationinEconomicsandFinance,StanfordUniversity.Allremainingerrorsaremine.11Introduction1.1MotivationAmajorpartoftheresearchin nancialeconomicsisdirectedtowardsim-provingourunderstandingofhowinvestorsmaketheirportfoliodecisionsandhenceofhowassetspricesaredetermined.Manycapitalasset-pricingmodelshavebeenputforthintheliterature.Inparticular,mean-varianceanalysisandtheSharpe-Lintner-MossinCAPM1arewidelyviewedasoneofthemajorcontributionsofacademicresearchinthepostwarera[Jagan-nathanandWang(1996),p.4].Overthepasttwodecadesanumberofstudieshaveexaminedtheem-piricalperformanceofCAPM,invariablyprovidingstrongevidenceofitsinabilitytoexplain(andthereforetopredict)thebehaviourof nancialmar-kets2.Nevertheless,[i]nspiteofthelackofempiricalsupport,theCAPMisstillthepreferredmodelforclassroomuseinMBAandothermanagerial nancecourses.InawayitremindsusofcartooncharacterslikeWileE.Coyotewhohavetheabilitytocomebacktooriginalshapeafterbeingblowntopiecesorhammeredoutofshape[JagannathanandWang(1996),p.4].InthispaperweareafterWileE.Coyoteonceagain,butwithanewdevice.Infact,econometricianshaveempiricallyrejecteditspredictionsand nancialtheoristshavecriticiseditsrestrictiveassumptions,butnoonetoourknowledgehasstudiedCAPMinanevolutionaryframework.Thefocusofourpaperisto llthisgapintheliteratureand,inparticular,totesttheperformanceofthestandardversionofCAPMinanevolutionarysetting.Conventional nancialtheoryshowsthat,underwell-knownassumptions,CAPMstemsfromrationalbehaviour.However,arecentstrandofliteratureonevolutionandmarketbehaviourstressesthatrationalityisneithersu¢-cientnoranecessaryconditionforsurvival.ThereforeaninterestingquestiontoaskiswhetherCAPMprescribesabehaviourwhichcanbeconsidered tinanevolutionarysense.Weimagineaheterogeneouspopulationoflong-livedagentswhoinvestaccordingtodi¤erentportfoliorulesandweaskwhatistheasymptoticmar-ketshareofthosewhohappentobehaveasprescribedbyCAPM.Namely1SeeSharpe(1964),Lintner(1965)andMossin(1996).2TheempiricalliteratureonCAPMissovastthatwewillnotattemptareviewhere.Forarecentaccount,see,foristance,JagannathanandWang(1996)andFamaandFrench(1996a,1996b).2weaimatdetectingtheasymptoticpropertiesofthewealthsharesoftradersthateitherbelieveinCAPManduseitasaruleofthumbfortheirport-foliodecisions,ordisplaygenuinemean-variancebehaviour.Ourresultssug-gestthatthereareseveralcircumstancesofeconomicinterestinwhichtheirwealthsharewillconvergealmostsurelytozero.Asu¢cientconditiontodriveCAPMtraderstoextinctionisthataninvestorendowedwithaloga-rithmicutilityfunctionentersthemarket.WebelievethatthisisaninterestingresultnotonlybecauseitprovesthatCAPMisnotrobustinanevolutionarysense,butalsobecauseittrig-gersonceagainthedebateonthenormativeappealanddescriptiveappealoflogarithmicutilityapproachasopposedtomean-varianceapproachin -nance.SinceaseminalarticlebyKelly(1956),several nancialeconomistsandappliedprobabilistshavebeendebatingwhethermaximisingalogarith-micutilityfunctionismorerationalforarationaltrader.Thedebateoriginatesfromthedissatisfactionwiththemean-varianceapproachwhichfailstosingleoutauniqueoptimalportfolio.Infact,thechosenmixbetweentheriskfreeassetandthemarketportfoliodependsoneachinvestorsde-greeofriskaversion.Severalauthors3havearguedthatarationallongruninvestorshouldmaximisetheexpectedgrowthrateofhiswealthshareand,therefore,shouldbehaveasifhewereendowedwithalogarithmicutilityfunction4(thesocalledKellycriterion).Thisyieldsauniquesolutiontotheoptimalportfolioproblem.ThisclaimhasbeenopposedbyMertonandSamuelson(1974)andGoldman(1974).Inparticular,MertonandSamuelsonscritiquestressedtheobviouscon-tradictionwhichliesinarguingthatrationaltradersshouldmaximiseautil-ityfunctionwhichisdi¤erentfromtheirown5.Theevolutionaryframeworkadoptedinthispape
本文标题:The Evolution of Portfolio Rules and the Capital A
链接地址:https://www.777doc.com/doc-6446058 .html