您好,欢迎访问三七文档
当前位置:首页 > 临时分类 > 城市建成区黑臭水体评价方法比较
334Vol.33No.4WATERRESOURCESPROTECTION20177Jul.2017DOI10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2017.04.0125157907151379061141073BK201313701994—。E-mail382209348@qq.com。E-mailliyiping@hhu.edu.cn2100982014。、、、1.29、1.53、1.77、2.3124.1%24.2%10%35%27%25%~30%。X703.1A1004-6933201704-0075-05StudyofrainwatermixingrateofdesignwaterquantityatdomesticsewagetreatmentplantsinTaizhouCityWENGShenglinLIYipingLUXuchuanQIWenCollegeofEnvironmentHohaiUniversityNanjing210098ChinaAbstractBasedonthedataofinflowofasewageplantanddatafromrainfallmonitoringstationsintheJiaojiangDistrictinTaizhouCityin2014weanalyzedthedailyinflowfrequencyatthesewageplantandtherainwatermixingrateinurbansewagepipenetworkssoastomodifythedesignwaterquantityofthesewageplant.Theresultsareasfollowsthesewagequantitiesinthecasesoflightmoderateheavyandcontinuouslyheavyrainfallwererespectively1.291.531.77and2.31timesthoseonsunnydays.Thequantityofgroundwatermixedinsewageaccountedfor24.1%ofthedailysewagequantityonsunnydaysandthequantityofrainwatermixedinsewageaccountedfor24.2%ofthedailysewagequantityonrainydays.Withtheincreaseofrainfalltherainwatermixingrateincreasedfrom10%to35%andfinallytendedtobe27%.Therainwatermixingrateofthedesignwaterquantityforsewageplantsincoastalcitiescanbedeterminedasavaluerangingfrom25%to30%.Keywordsrainwatermixingrateinfiltrationflowdesignwaterquantitysewageplantscale4、、、1。、、、、、、。、、。2-3。·57·。456Brombach710H、O8De9Lee1011、1.8~4.6TN、TP3126%135d200mm60%。。14。、15、10%。。11.1———。。。356665.3km43.69km225300m3。。1563mm155.1m3140~180d。、、。4—67—1075%~85%。、。、、、5。。、。。1.21.2.120141—12。、、、、、、、、、11120141—12。11.2.216。an%100na。·67·。。1.2.317。。2。2、ABBC、。222.1201438~20t/d330mm60mm。4。010%50%90%100%34。8.2t/d10.5t/d1.2912.5t/d1.5314.5t/d1.7718.8t/d2.31。。。。、。。2.2、。201418201410.75t/d2.59t/d24.1%14.18t/d1.323.43t/d24.2%18.3%、·77·。50%。5。55~20mm1~3mm。5~20mm。1~3mm、3~5mm、5~10mm12.3%、16.5%、20.4%10~20mm、20~30mm26.8%、35.5%。10%35%。27%。。2.319、、、20。、10%。。2.3211.522323。2410%~20%2523%2625.9%2615%~50%2730%2834、30%、35%、35%2910%50%30。。、24.2%10%35%27%10%。25%~30%。、、、31-33。324.1%18.3%24.2%。25%~30%。1.“”J.2009441-42.HUChunming.DistributionofrainandsewageorcombinedsystemJ.CitiesandTownsConstructioninGuangxi2009441-42.inChinese2.·87·J.201410233-234.XUZhenyuLIDahai.OperationstatusquoandcountermeasureofexistingproblemsofsewagetreatmentplantsinQinhuangdaoCityJ.HeilongjiangScienceandTechnologyofWaterConservancy201410233-234.inChinese3.J.2013325160-161.LIJin.TheexistingproblemsandcountermeasuresofsewagepipenetworkusingthepipenetworkofsewagetreatmentplantinXiamenCityasanexampleJ.TechnologicalDevelopmentofEnterprise2013325160-161.inChinese4.J.2006221753-56.XUEMeiZHOUKejinGUOYilingetal.Surveyofunknown-waterinsewersandcorrespondingcountermeasureJ.ChinaWater&Wastewater2006221753-56.inChinese5.D.2014.6.J.200326330-31.DONGJingchun.AstatisticalmethodforprojectionofmunicipalsewageJ.EnvironmentalScienceandTechnology200326330-31.inChinese7BROMBACHHWEISSGLUCASS.TemporalvariationofinfiltrationinflowincombinedsewersystemsJ.GlobalSolutionsforUrbanDrainage20022441-10.8KRACHTOGRESCHMGUJERW.InnovativetracermethodsforsewerinfiltrationmonitoringJ.UrbanWaterJournal200855173-185.9DEBJBERTRAND-KRAJEWSKIJL.MeasurementofinfiltrationratesinurbansewersystemsbyuseofoxygenisotopesJ.WaterScience&TechnologyAJournaloftheInternationalAssociationonWaterPollutionResearch2005523229-37.10LEERK.InterpretingstormflowdatatodeterminetypesofinfiltrationandinflowC//PipelineDivisionSpecialtyConference.HoustonPipelineDivsionofASCE2005497-509.11.D.2004.12.J.201331217-21.SHENGZhengLIUXujunWANGHaozhengetal.ResearchandapplicationprogressonmonitoringtechnologyofurbansewagepipelineinflowandinfiltrationJ.EnvironmentalEngineering201331217-21.inChinese13.J.200329429-31.WUZhaoshengHUANGPUJiaqunJINJiaming.CapacitydeterminationinmunicipalwaterandwastewaterengineeringplanningJ.WaterandWastewaterEngineering200329429-31.inChinese14.D.2005.15.J.2013291777-80.FANGJuanMEIYaqingZENGWeietal.ApplicationofdifferentwaterconsumptionindicatorstoforecastingscaleofwastewatertreatmentplantJ.ChinaWater&Wastewater2013291777-80.inChinese16.、J.20151712-15.HOUBaodengGAOErkunZHANXuzhuetal.ConnotationcalculationandapplicationofguaranteerateofwateruseJ.ChinaWaterResources20151712-15.inChinese17DAVIDZZ.J.201329421-25.GUOShuaiZHANGShiqiaoDAVIDZZ.QuantitativemethodsforgroundwaterinfiltrationintosewersystemJ.ChinaWater&Wastewater201329421-25.inChinese18.D.2012.19.J.201224146.MARenjiao.AcomparativestudyonthepredictionofwastewaterinasewagetreatmentplantJ.Science-TechnologyEnterprise201224146.inChinese20.J.2015962771-2776.ZHANGChaoJIANGYinghe.OptimizationofinterceptionratioofcombinedsewersystemJ.TechniquesandEquipmentforEnvironmentalPollutionControl2015962771-2776.inChinese21.J.201440240-44.LITianQIANJingSHENJunetal.WaterqualitymonitoringandanalysisonrainydaysinHefeiCitydrainagesystemJ.WaterandWastewaterEngineering201440240-44.inChinese22.J.2014370-71.WENBiao.ProblemsandcountermeasuresintheoperationoftherainyseasonintheurbansewageplantJ.JiangxiBuildingMaterials2014370-71.inChinese94·97·19.J.2015341195
本文标题:城市建成区黑臭水体评价方法比较
链接地址:https://www.777doc.com/doc-6547991 .html