您好,欢迎访问三七文档
当前位置:首页 > 商业/管理/HR > 咨询培训 > 对用于危险废物鉴别的几种浸出方法比对研究
:2005-04-10:2005-10-20:(2003BA614A-11):(1963-),,,.1,2,1,2,1(1.,100012;2.,250100):,,:,,(USEPA)TCLPSPLP;:;;;:X80312:A:1001-6929(2005)S0-0023-04AComparisonStudyontheLeachingTestMethodsUsedinHazardousWasteIdentificationLIUFeng1,SUNSi2xiu2,WANGLu2xin1,ZHOUDe2jie2,DAITian2you1(1.ResearchInstituteofSolidWasteManagement,ChineseResearchAcademyofEnvironmentalSciences,Beijing100012,China;2.SchoolofChemistryandChemicalEngineering,ShandongUniversity,Jinan250100,China)Abstract:Byusingtheplatingsludgeastestsample,fivestandardleachingtestmethodsofChina,U.S.AandEUwerecompared.Themethodologyofthemethodsandthelimitvaluesofhazardouswastewerediscussed.TheresultsshowthattheleachingrateoftheleachingmethodsusedinChinaisrelativelylow,andthemethodologybasesareinsufficient,whichisthedisadvantagetocontrolthehazardouswaste.TheTCLPandSPLPofUSEPAweredesignedforassessmentoftheimpactofco2dispositionofindustrialwasteinMSWandtheimpactofacidprecipitationtosoilandsole2disposedwasteseparately.TheEUputforwardthewasteacceptancecriteriaaccordingtodifferenttypesoflandfill.Thesethoughtsandmodusoperandiareworthtostudyanduseforreference.Keywords:solidwaste;hazardouswaste;leaching;identification,,,1111:(530rPmin),((11010)Pmin);:1L2L;:;:017m,0145m;pH:25,0105pH;:010001g;:Teflon,410,510915mm;,Z-8200112,,4Cu,Zn,Mn,Fe,Cr,CdNi1135GB508611-1997[1]GB508612-1997[2],(USEPA)1311(TCLP)[3]1312(SPLP)[4]EN12457-3[5],GB508611-1997GB508612-1997,TCLPRCRA,SPLP,EN12457-3,5118ResearchofEnvironmentalSciencesVol.18,Suppl.,200515Table1ThekeyparametersofthefiveleachingtestsP(Lkg-1)PhPminP(rmin-1)PgPmmGB508611-19971018303027050145mGB508612-1997108960110101)10050145mTCLP,pH2188011molPL,pH4193011molPL202)182302100915016018mSPLP,pH412HNO3PH2SO43),pH510HNO3PH2SO43)202)182302100915016018mEN12457-32860151801515515551010175540145m1)min-1;2)kgkg-1;3)m(HNO3)m(H2SO4)=6040221152TCLPP,pH5122,P,,Cu,Zn,Fe,CrNi5;EN12457-32,,MnCdTCLP;SPLPHNO3PH2SO4(m(HNO3)m(H2SO4)=4060),,,pH6154,,TCLP,GB508611-1997GB508612-1997USEPA3050(HNO3-H2O2),,2Table2TestresultscomparisonoftheleachingmethodsmgPkgw(Cu)w(Zn)w(Mn)w(Fe)w(Cr)w(Cd)P(gkg-1)w(Ni)GB508611-19970133110312193186410031931100GB508612-199701731147151105120216731470147TCLP28145610122104716474103412116SPLP2193214720131613221912112187EN12457-3911613111541316301448177514USEPA30501380956244027300597006911240212TCLP,(MSW),MSWMSW[6]TCLP20kgPkg,20kgPkg[7]SPLPSPLPTCLP,HNO3PH2SO4TCLP,SPLP:,pH412HNO3P4218H2SO4;,pH510HNO3PH2SO43,EN12457P1-4,4:1,2LPkg,4mm;2,10LPkg,4mm;32,28LPkg,4mm;4,10LPkg,10mm,4,[5]GB508611-1997GB508612-19971997,,2,213(GB508513-1996)14,1440CFR261124TC(3),,GB508611-1997GB508612-1997TCLP,,,,210LPkg,(mgPkg),;0,1LPkg(),(mgPL)10LPkg4[8]3GB508513-199640CFR261124Table3SomemetallimitvaluesofGB508513-1996and40CFR261124mgPL(Hg)(Pb)(Cd)(Cr)(Cu)(Zn)(Ba)(Ni)(As)GB508513-199601053100131050501001011540CFR2611240125101105101005104(WAC)Table4SomemetallimitvaluesofWACofEUmgPkgw(Hg)w(Pb)w(Cd)w(Cr)w(Cu)w(Zn)w(Ba)w(Ni)w(As)0101015010401524200140150121011050501001022505701002003004025:10LPkg214(GB508611-1997GB508612-1997),2,2,USEPA,,,,,TCLP2(5),,2,2,,5Table5TestresultscomparisonoftheleachingmethodswithdifferentagitationapparatusmgPkgw(Cu)w(Zn)w(Mn)w(Fe)w(Cr)w(Cd)P(gkg-1)w(Ni)11422180610821382317117151821114112131950138216601852111,576(192),20%55%,40%80%(1),,52:1Fig.1Theprecisionanalysisoftheleachingtests,3,(),,,USEPATCLPSPLP,,,,,:[1]GB5086.1-1997,[S].GB5086.1-1997,Testmethodstandardforleachingtoxicityofsolidwaste:rolloverleachingprocedure[S].[2]GB5086.2-1997,[S].GB5086.2-1997,Testmethodstandardforleachingtoxicityofsolidwaste:horizontalvibrationextractionprocedure[S].[3]Method1311,Toxicitycharacteristicleachingprocedure[S].[4]Method1312,Syntheticprecipitationleachingprocedure[S].[5]EN12457-3:2002,Compliancetestforgranularwastematerialsandsludges[S].[6]U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency.Hazardouswaste;identificationandlisting;finalandinterimrules[J].FederalRegister,1980,45:33084.[7]FramptonJ.ComparisonofCaliforniaswasteextractiontest(WET)andtheU.S.EPAstoxicitycharacteristicprocedure(TCLP)[M].California:CaliforniaDepartmentofToxicSubstancesControl,1998.[8]CounciloftheEuropeanUnion.Councildecisionof19December2002establishingcriteriaandproceduresfortheacceptanceofwasteatlandfillspursuanttoarticle16ofandannexIItodirective1999P31PEC(2003P33PEC)[EBPOL].http:PPeuropa.eu.intPeurlexPpriPenPojPdatP2003Pl011Pl01120030116en00270049.pdf,2002.()6218
本文标题:对用于危险废物鉴别的几种浸出方法比对研究
链接地址:https://www.777doc.com/doc-6557754 .html