您好,欢迎访问三七文档
当前位置:首页 > 建筑/环境 > 工程监理 > 几种单跨框架结构抗震加固方法的比较
SichuanBuildingScience384201282012-02-271966-。E-mailwushanneng@gmail.com200092、。Midas/gen3。TU352.1A1008-1933201204-160-05Comparisonofseveralseismicstrengtheningmethodsofsingle-spanframestructureWUShannengTANGXiangDepartmentofBuildingEngineeringTongjiUniversityShanghai200092ChinaAbstractAddingframecolumnsbuckling-restrainedbraceBRBandshearwallsarecommonseismicstrengtheningmethodsofsingle-spanframestructures.Inthispapertheseismicperformancesofatypicalsingle-spanframeschoolbuildingafterstrengthenedusingthese3strengtheningmethodsarecomparedbasedontheresponsespectrumanalysisandpushoveranalysisusingthefiniteelementsoftwareMidas/gen.Keywordssingle-spanframestructureseismicstrengtheningresponsespectrumanalysispushoveranalysis0。、、。、GB50011—2010《》1GB50023—2009《》2。、、。JGJ116—2009《》36.2.12-24m、、。Midas/gen3。1412。6.0m2.1m3.6m3.6m。KZ1400mm×400mmKL1250mm×550mmKL2250mm×350mmLL250mm×250mm。、C25HRB335。Ⅳ70.10g。2、、。2.1。?。KZ20613300mm×300mmC25。1Fig.1Architecturallayoutplan2Fig.2Structurallayoutplan3Fig.3Thearrangementplanofnewframecolumns4Fig.4ThearrangementplanofBRB2.2、、BRB。。4、、。41612012No.4。2500mm2300kN。2.3。5150mmC25。5Fig.5Thearrangementplanofshearwalls3Midas/gen1。M0M1M2M3。1Table1ResponsespectrumanalysisresultsunderfrequentearthquakeM0M1M2M3sT10.73X0.69X0.49X0.35XT20.69Y0.57Y0.39Y0.26T30.650.540.340.18YTt/T10.890.780.690.74X1/8821/9201/18461/3529Y1/9301/13431/30001/13846X1.051.011.021.03Y1.001.001.001.00/kNX500565584936Y547610592949/kN·mX52975974614810375Y578063906199104293。1Tt/T10.89。。0.79sTg0.65sTTg5Tg。12。。44.15Push-over。。。Midas/gen。/-/-。FEMA-273ATC-406。4AB、BC、CD、26138DEBIOLSCPC。6FEMAFig.6ConstitutiverelationofplastichingeinFEMAMidas/genPushover×《》5.5.5。M3Y150mm300mm。7X-Fig.7Load-displacementcurvealongXaxisFEMA-2733、、SRSS。。。4.24XYPush-over4XY-78。、、、M0。8Y-Fig.8Load-displacementcurvealongYaxis--Acceleration-DisplacementResponseSpectrumfor-mat17ⅣA-D。4XYPushover2。2PushoverTable2PerformancepointsofpushoveranalysisunderrareearthquakeM0M1M2M3Sa/mm/s2X0.21890.24600.31660.3913Y0.21130.28230.36790.4544Sd/mmX58.4047.3325.6513.31Y53.7736.4512.933.806Vb/kNX1488186923354613Y1547217127515564Un/mmX75.9861.4533.6918.54Y68.8246.7416.645.371XY910。M0M3XY。Y。11~14M0~M3Y。M0、23。M1、233612012No.49XFig.9StorydriftalongXaxisatperformancepointofpushoveranalysis10YFig.10StorydriftalongYaxisatperformancepointofpushoveranalysis11M0YFig.11DistributingofplastichingesofModel0atperformancepointpushalongYaxis12M1YFig.12DistributingofplastichingesofModel1atperformancepointpushalongYaxis2。M2、2、13M2YFig.13DistributingofplastichingesofModel2atperformancepointpushalongYaxis14M3YFig.14DistributingofplastichingesofModel3atperformancepointpushalongYaxis。M32。。5。。。、。1GB50011—2010S.2GB50023—2009S.3JGJ116—2009S.4.TJR.5.PushoverAnalysisJ.200401.46138
本文标题:几种单跨框架结构抗震加固方法的比较
链接地址:https://www.777doc.com/doc-7406283 .html