2%2B2作文策略(1)

第1页共22页CET-4/6作文题评分原则及标准一、评分原则l、CET是检查大家是否达到大学英语教学大纲规定的四级和2+2教学要求，对作文的评判应以此要求为准则，2、CET作文题采用总体评分(GlobalScoring)方法。阅卷人员就总的印象给出奖励分(RewardScores)，而不是按语言点的错误数目扣分。3、从内容和语言两个方面对作文进行综合评判。内容和语言是一个统一体。作文应表达题目所规定的内容，而内容要通过语言来表达。要考虑作文是否切题，是否充分表达思想，也要考虑是否用英语清楚而合适地表达思想，也就是要考虑语言上的错误是否造成理解上的障碍。4、避免趋中倾向。该给高分的给高分，包括满分；该给低分给低分,包括零分。一名阅卷人员在所评阅的全部作文卷中不应只给中间的几种分数。二、评分标准l、本题满分为15分2、阅卷标准共分五等：2分、5分、8分、11分及14分。各有标准样卷一至二份。3、阅卷人员根据阅卷标准，对照样卷评分，若认为与某一分数(如8分)相似，即定为该分数(即8分)；若认为稍优或稍劣于该分数则可加一分(即9分)或减一分(即7分)。但不得加或减半分。4、评分标准2分一条理不清，思路紊乱，语言支离破碎或大部分句子均有错误，且多数为严重错误。5分一基本切题。表达思想不清楚，连贯性差。有较多的严重语言错误。8分一基本切题。有些地方表达思想不够清楚，文字勉强连贯：语言错误相当多，其中有一些是严重错误。11分一切题。表达思想清楚，文字连贯，但有少量语言错误。14分一切题。表达思想清楚，文字通顺，连贯性较好，基本上无语言错误，仅有个别小错。[注：白卷，作文与题目毫不相关，或只有几个孤立的词而无法表达思想，则给0分．]5、字数不足应酌情扣分：[注：1、如题目中给出主题句，起始句，结束句，均不得计入所写字数。2、规定的内容未写全者，按比例扣分。3、如果扣为0分，要慎重处理。MyViewonUniversityRanking1.目前高校排名相当盛行2.对于这种做法人们看法不一3.在我看来……14分Nowadays,universityrankingisverypopularinChina.Everytimeaneweditionofuniversityrankingisreleased,itwillattractconsiderablepublicattention,andaheateddebatewillariseonwhethertherankingfairlyreflectsthestrengthofeachcollege.Proponentsoftherankingclaimthatithaslotsofpositiveeffects.First,itisakindofstimulusforuniversitiestoimprovetheirresearchandteachingquality.Goodresearchand累计字数CET-4110-119100-10990-9980-8970-7960-6950-5949CET-6140-149130-139120-129110-119100-10990-9980-8979扣分12345679第2页共22页teachingwillleadtohigherranking,meaningthattheycanattractmoreexcellentstudentsandprofessors.Inaddition,universityrankinghelpshigh-schoolstudentstochoosewhichuniversitytoattendsincetheylackrelatedinformation.Opponentsarguethatuniversityrankingbringsfarmorenegativethanpositiveeffects.Itisreportedthatsomeuniversitiesbribetherankingorganizationtoimprovetheirranking,insteadofenhancingtheirownstrengthinteachingandresearch.Besides,manypeoplequestionthemethodofevaluationandtheaccuracyoftheinformationtherankingisbasedon.Frommyprospective,whileuniversityrankingmayhaveitsdefects,itdoesservegoodpurposes.Whatweneedtodoistomakeitfairerandmoretransparent.Onlyinthisway,couldthispracticeprovideincentivestouniversitiesandwintrustfromthepublic.11分Nowadayspeoplepaymoreattentiontoeducation,whichmakesuniversityrankingmoreandmorepopular.Therearemanyheateddiscussionsonwhetherthatisnecessary.Opinionsaredividedonthisissue.Ononehand,somepeopleholdtheopinionthatuniversityrankinghasmoreadvantagesthandisadvantages.Forthemeasuresoftherankingdependonmanydifferentfactsandfigures,itcanmakeafaircommentontheuniversities.Ontheotherhand,somepeoplethinkthattherankingmaymisleadstudents.Influencedbytheuniversityranking,manystudentsmayhaveawrongviewoftheuniversitiestheyarelongingforortheyarealreadyin.AsfarasIcansee,everythinghasitsadvantagesanddisadvantages.Iftherankingisusedinagoodway,itcanstimulateoureducationsystem.Theuniversitiesrankedhighcanattractmoreexcellentstudents,andtheuniversitiesrankedcomparativelylowcanpaymoreattentiontoimprovethemselves.Butifitisnotusedinagoodway,therankingmaydoharmtotheuniversitiesaswellasstudents.8分ThepopularityofuniversityRankingisrising,whichhasdrawngreatattentionsanddebates.Manyfamouswebsites,suchasSina,havetheuniversityRanking,especiallyduringthetimeofUniversityEntranceTest.What'smore,thehighschoolsandfamilymembersalwaysemphasizetheRanking,whichbringagreatpressuretostudents.TheviewstotheuniversityRankingarevaried.Someapproveit.Theyholdtheopinionthatwecanchoosetheuniversitywhichfitsusbest.TheRankingisvalueableinformationaboutuniversities.However,othersareintheopposite.Theirreasonsareasfollows.Firstly,wecan'tmakesurethetruthoftheRanking.Ifit'snottrue,itwillmisleadstudents.Secondly,theRankingmayencouragesomeuniversitiesdosomethingtoenhancetherank,suchasgivebenefittotheRankingmakers,whichiscalledBuyRanking.So,inthisway,howcanauniversityfocusitsattentiononTeaching,andhowcantheyfosterstudentswell?Lastbutnotleast,therearesomanyRankingsnow.Howweknowwhichistrue.Inmyopinion,bothsideshavemeritsanddrawbacks.WeshouldjudgeauniversitybymorethanauniversityRanking.5分Inthelatestfewyears,peoplemayfindkindsofuniversityrankingreadingnewspaper,surferingtheinternetandevenwatchingthenewsreports.Asweallknow,onethingmaybeevaluatedquietdifferentbygroupswithdistinctopinions.Thingsgothesameinsuchaphonomenion.Supportersmaythinkthatuniversityrankingcanhelpseniorhighschoolstudents第3页共22页tomakeanaproprWtchoiceofwhichuniversitytogo,whilesomeinstitutionsareinneedofgraduatescanranktheapplicantsbycheckingtheirschools.However,peoplewiththeoppositeviewmaysay:Evaluatingauniversityasksformanyelementssuchasculture,faculties,avarangelevelofstudentsandsoon.Thenwecanhardlycometoaquantresult.Inmyopinion,viewsmentionedabovecanbecomplementstoeachother.Generalspeaking,weshouldtrytodevelopabettermethodwhichcoversasmanyaspossiblefacetsofacertainuniversity.Theresultmaybehigh-dimention,soitdoesn'thavetobeordered.Asaresult,peoplecanjudgeauniversityinpersonalizedview.Itmaybebetter.2分Asthelevelofpeople'slifeproving,peopletakemoreattentiononeducation.Nowdays,universityrankingispoupleinChina.Andtherearedifferetcompaniesproducesomanydiffer