硕士论文-网络环境下的隐私权保护

华东政法学院硕士学位论文网络环境下的隐私权保护姓名：金斌华申请学位级别：硕士专业：法律指导教师：何勤华20040407TheprotectionoftherighttoprivacyincyberspaceMajor:J.MDirection:civilandcommerciallawName:JinbinhuaTutor:HeqinhuaTherighttoprivacyisafundamentalrightincivillawrelationship,whichisadoptedandprotectedbymanycountries.Duetosomereasons,therighttoprivacyisnotadoptedasapersonalityrightinourcivillaw.Iftherighttoprivacyisinfringed,thecourtwillgivecivilreliefaccordingtotherighttoreputationorcommonpersonalityright.Itisbadtoprotecttherighttoprivacywithoutlegalarticle.Incyberspace,thecontinuouschangeoftechnologyandinstrumentbringforwardchallengetotheprotectionoftherighttoprivacy.TheInternettechnologymakesastrongimpactontherighttoprivacy,whichchangetheambitbetweenpublicandprivate.Whilethepersonalinformationbringseconomicvalueandefficiencytoelectronicbusiness,theidealoftherighttoprivacyisbeingdamaged.InthedevelopmentofInternet,thecallof“allwin”seemsbeautiful,butitactuallyisfalse.Wemustprotectsuchfundamentalrightandkeepfreedom.Duetothedevelopmentofinternettechnologyandtheinternetfunction,thesituationofinfringementtotherighttoprivacybecomesworse.Astotheinfringement,thereareseveraltypes:obtainanduseofpersonnelinformationillegally,includethewebsite,thehackers,theinternetsearchersandthegovernment;disclosetheprivacyinformationintheinternet;infringeuponthecommunicationintheinternet.Withthedevelopmentoftherighttoprivacy,ithasextendedtothecyberspace.Astotheinternettechnology,itiseasytocollect,usethepersonnelinformation.Inthecyberspace,theprivacyinformationisvaluable.Theprotectionoftherighttoprivacydoesnotonlymeanstheprotectionoftherighttoletalone,butalsomeanstheeconomicinterest.Fortheneedofprivacyinformation,therighttoprivacyhasthecharacterofpersonalityandproperty.Tosharethevalueofpersonnelinformation,thewebsite,thehackers,theinternetsearcherscollectthecyberspacepersonnelinformationwithoutthepermissionoftheperson.Withtheinfringementofcyberspaceprivacy,thepeoplealwaysencounterthesituationofimmaterialdamagesandpropertieslose.Duetotheinternet,therighttoprivacyincyberspacedoesnotonlymeanthepersonality,butalsomeantheeconomicinterest.Theholderoftherightcanacquiretheeconomicinterestifhesharestheprivacyinformationwithothers.Inthecyberspace,theconflictbetweentheneedofinformationandtheprotectionofinformationisheavy,weshouldmakebalanceofit.Asforchina,wedonnothavethebaseofcultureandlegalfortherighttoprivacy.Makereferencetoothercountriesandregions’legislation,weshouldmakeregulationfortherighttoprivacyincyberspace.Keywords:therighttoprivacycyberspacetortslegalprotection1googleGoogleGoogleGoogleGoogleGoogle2186811890LouisD.BrandeisSamuelDWarrenTheRighttoPrivacy.2therighttoprivacy119992452Warrenandbrandiestherighttoprivacy,’srighttocontrolthecirculationofinformationrelatingtooneself11·12102001111198930122001733813TheregulationofCyberspaceinformationprivacy1413199952614:=29889151161519952316:=298810enonymous.comPC391443.54Enonymous10008.647993258022251117217enonymous.com:20029212191920007202004331132121=298814ISPAOLEarthLinkFBIFBIISPinteractivitydatabase2223listservmailexplodersUSENETNews-group(internetreplaychat)(Telnet)(ftp)(gopher)22:2002223http:=185515242524200112520011911617182626200290192727199726020282820043342129ISPAOLEarthLinkFBIFBIISP17303129=298830:19976131SeegenerallyPaulM.SchwartzPrivacyandParticipation:PersonalInformationandPublicSectorRegulationinthe2232UnitedStates80IowaL.Rew.553(1995)32See:IanJLloyd,informationtechnologylaw,2nd.Butterworth,1997,p31233333:=298824343534AndrewL.Shapiro,PrivacyforSale:PeddlingDataontheInternet,Nation,June23,199735200433725252627363736200433537.213632829383820043352938382004335303939“”42422002316364344432002144=298837119972200332001420045..23200262002720018200192000101998114200112200013.199914200015200216200217199818200119200120200121200322200223200124200225200126200327199228200129200330200231200132200133.1120003834199535200336200213720011382001139200174019903412002442:=298843SeegenerallyPaulM.SchwartzPrivacyandParticipation:PersonalInfor