您好,欢迎访问三七文档
当前位置:首页 > 商业/管理/HR > 信息化管理 > 碱基互补配对原则的计算规律
分析:测量特性Pass/通过1公差Fail/未通过0零件A-1A-2A-3B-1B-2B-3C-1C-2C-3参考决定参考值代码11111111111+21111111111+30000000001×40000000000×50000000000×61101101001×71111111011×81111111111+90000000000×101111111111+111111111111+120000000100×131111111111+141101111001×151111111111+161111111111+171111111111+181111111111+191111111111+201111111111+211101010101×220010101100×231111111111+241111111111+250000000000×260100000010×271111111111+281111111111+291111111111+300000010000×311111111111+321111111111+331111111111+340010010110×351111111111+361101111011×370000000000×381111111111+390000000000×401111111111+411111111111+420000000000×431011111101×441111111111+450000000000×461111111111+471111111111+480000000000×491111111111+500000000000×零件样品数量具名称量具编号长沙申大科技有限公司计数型测量系统分析报告AttributeGateMSAReport零件代号零件名称数据记录表日期:32020/1/20操作员A:B:C:试验次数操作人数350数据总结A﹡BB﹡CA﹡CA﹡参考B﹡参考C﹡参考0﹡04442434242390﹡165885121﹡03973361﹡19794929710093自评与基准一致ABCABC424540414439A0.005050.01.00100100.0总计150150.0Po=Pe=Kappa=B0.004747.01.00103103.0总计150150.0Po=Pe=Kappa=A0.005151.01.009999.0总计150150.0Po=Pe=Kappa=KappaKappa<0.40,评价人之间一致性不好Kappa>0.75,评价人之间一致性很好Kappa=1,评价人之间完全一致性再现性Kappa列表中表明:评价人之间一致性很好0.940.86计数型测量系统分析报告AttributeGateMSAReport44A﹡C交叉表0.560.79数量长沙申大科技有限公司总计A﹡B交叉表总计B﹡C交叉表0.560.780.55B0.001.00分析:日期:5946103期望的数量47.0103.0期望的数量15.734.3数量397期望的数量31.368.7数量471.00数量42数量9期望的数量16.031.0期望的数量35.068.0数量5199期望的数量51.099.0数量0.910.90C0.001.00总计438期望的数量17.034.0数量792期望的数量33.066.0数量50100期望的数量50.0100.0A﹡BB﹡CA﹡C0.860.790.782020/1/20C0.00A0.005050.01.00100100.0总计150150.0Po=Pe=Kappa=B0.004747.01.00103103.0总计150150.0Po=Pe=Kappa=C0.005151.01.009999.0总计150150.0Po=Pe=Kappa=KappaKappa<0.40,评价人与参考之间一致性不好Kappa>0.75,评价人与参考之间一致性很好Kappa=1,评价人与参考之间完全一致性Kappa列表中表明:评价人与参考之间一致性不好总计总计B﹡参考交叉表1.00长沙申大科技有限公司0.720.560.880.830.570.93总计A﹡参考交叉表0.00期望的数量15.035.0参考0.870.72A﹡参考B﹡参考C﹡参考C﹡参考交叉表0.870.570.95数量期望的数量105.0计数型测量系统分析报告AttributeGateMSAReport4510545.00.83期望的数量29.769.3期望的数量15.335.7数量693参考0.001.00数量3912期望的数量45.0105.072.1数量451053100期望的数量30.9期望的数量14.132.9数量期望的数量数量42545.0105.0参考0.001.00分析:日期:期望的数量30.070.0数量2020/1/20数量45105397数量428变差来源评价人A评价人B评价人C评价人A评价人B评价人C总检查数505050505050匹配数424540414439错误的拒收(由于评价人偏倚造成的拒收)111错误的接受(由于评价人偏倚造成的接受)000混淆的(操作者接收和拒收相同的零件)851095%UCI92.8%96.7%90.0%91.4%95.5%88.5%计算结果84.0%90.0%80.0%82.0%88.0%78.0%95%LCI70.9%78.2%66.3%68.6%75.7%64.0%总检查数5050匹配数393895%UCI88.5%86.9%计算结果78.0%76.0%95%LCI64.0%61.8%有效性漏发误发84%7.6%6.7%90%4.8%6.7%80%11.4%13.3%1、在所有测量中,评价人本身是一致的;注意:2、评价人对所有测量与已知标准一致;3、所有评价人本身与其它人之间是一致的;4、所有评价人本身与其它人之间一致,并与参考值一致。长沙申大科技有限公司计数型测量系统分析报告AttributeGateMSAReport有效性错误率决定测量系统系统有效结果%3系统有效结果%与参考比较4分析:日期:≥90%≤2%评价人可接受的条件评价人%1(自评)评价人%与参考比较2<80%>5%评价人不可接受的条件--需要改进≥80%≤5%评价人可接受的条件--可能需要改进错误警报率≤5%≤10%评价人判定判定A可接受可能需改进可接受可能需改进B接受接受C可接受可能需改进不可接受需改进判定不可接受需改进不可接受需改进不可接受需改进>10%2020/1/200.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%100.00%123有效性%评价人%(自评)95%UCL计算结果95%LCI0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%100.00%123有效性%评价人%与参考比较95%UCI计算结果95%LCI基本尺寸0Max0I最大极限尺寸0MinII区0II最小极限尺寸0Max0II公差0MinIII区0III1/10公差0Max0III0*0:A0*1:B1*0:C1*1:D123123123DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADDADCADBADDDDCDDBDDDDDDDDDDAAAAAAAAADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDAAAABAACADDDDDDDDDDDBDCCDBADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDCBCBCBDAABCBDACCBDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDAAAAAAAAAACAAABABCDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDAABAACAAADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDAADABDACDDDDDDDDDDDDBDCDDBCAAAAAAAAADDDDDDDDDAAAAAAAAADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDAAAAAAAAADBDDDCDCBDDDDDDDDDAAAAAAAAADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDAAAAAAAAADDDDDDDDDAAAAAAAAA分析用表格A﹡BB﹡CA﹡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自评分析用表格C﹡参考A﹡参考B﹡参考BCABCABC11111110001111111000110001000011111110001111111000000000000010110000001111111000111111100011111110001111111000101100000011111110001001000000111111100011111110001111111000111111100011111110001111111000000000000000000000001111111000111111100011111110001001000000111111100011111110001111111000011010000011111110001111111000111111100000000000001111111000100100000011111110001111111000111111100011111110001111111000111111100010010000001111111000111111100011111110001111111000111111100011111110001111111000评价人一致性自评与基准一致分析用表格评价人与基准的一致性错误的接收ABC000000111000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000错误的拒收
本文标题:碱基互补配对原则的计算规律
链接地址:https://www.777doc.com/doc-3198258 .html