APQP常识

©20.August2019,RainerKoch1精准、激情、团队APQPTRAINING©20.August2019,RainerKoch2APQPAwareness常识AdvancedProductQualityPlanning产品质量先期策划©20.August2019,RainerKoch3Expectations期望APQPTRAININGNANCHANG©20.August2019,RainerKoch4WhydoweneedAPQP?为何需要APQP?TodelivertothecustomertheneworthechangedParts:目的是在向顾客交付新的或已变更的零件时能够符合如下三条：intherighttime恰当的时间intherightnumber正确的数量intherightquality合格的质量©20.August2019,RainerKoch5Purposeoftoday‘sSession今日培训之目的YouwillgetanoverviewoftheAPQPprocess.掌握APQP流程的概述。TheprinciplesoftheAPQPelementswillbeoutlined.概述APQP各要素的原则。DetailsofeachAPQPelementarenotoutlined!不包括APQP要素的详细描述！©20.August2019,RainerKoch6DefinitionofAPQP定义APQPisastructuredmethodfordefiningandsettingtheactionsnecessarytoensurethataproductmeetscustomerrequirements,particularlywithregardtoquality.APQP是一种结构化的方法，用来确定和制定确保某产品满足顾客要求（尤指质量方面）所需的措施。©20.August2019,RainerKoch7TheBenefitofAPQP益处ThebenefitoftheAPQPstatusreportistolaydownacommon,standardisedapproachforthetransmissionofprogrammestatusinordertofacilitatecommunicationsbetweencustomersandsuppliers.APQP现状报告的好处是为变速箱程序状态规定一个一般的、标准化的方法，以促进顾客和供方的联系。©20.August2019,RainerKoch8HowQS-9000wasdevelopedQS-9000是如何制定的1988summerconferenceoftheASQCAutomotiveDivisionASQC（美国质量控制学会）汽车分部1988夏季会议OEMVPsdecidetosetupanOEMSupplierQualityRequirementsTaskForceOEM（整车厂）的副总们决定建立整车厂供方质量要求特别工作组Aim:harmonisationofquality-relatedmanualsandformats目的：协调质量相关手册及表格ResultsofharmonisationareQS-9000andtherelatedmanuals(‘7’Pack,1993);2ndedition(January1996).协调的结果便是制定了QS-9000及相关手册(‘7’套,1993);第二版(1996.1).ASQC-AmericanSocietyforQualityControlOEM-OriginalEquipmentManufacturer(autobuilders)VP–VicePresident©20.August2019,RainerKoch9The‘7’Packconsistsof:‘7’套包括：QualitySystemRequirementsQS9000质量体系要求QualitySystemAssessmentQSA质量体系评估ProductionPartApprovalProcessPPAP生产件批准程序AdvancedProductQualityPlanning&ControlPlansAPQP产品质量先期策划和控制计划FundamentalStatisticalProcessControlSPC基本统计过程控制PotentialFailureModesandEffectsAnalysisFMEA潜在失效模式及后果分析MeasurementSystemAnalysisMSA测量系统分析©20.August2019,RainerKoch10APQPManual手册©20.August2019,RainerKoch11ISO/TS16949QS9000(Chrysler,Ford,GM)+otherautomakers’standards(fromFrance,Spain,Japan,etc.)werebroughttogetherinISO/TS16949(InternationalStandardOrganisation/TechnicalSpecification)inordertocreateaglobalstandard.集合QS9000(Chrysler,Ford,GM)和其它汽车制造商的标准（法国、西班牙、日本等）共同制定ISO/TS16949（国际标准化组织/技术规范），以建立一个全球化的标准。©20.August2019,RainerKoch12Whichstandardapplies?采用何种标准？GETRAGrelationswithsuppliers:GETRAG与供方间关系APQPedition2withminoradjustments使用第二版APQP，作轻微调整GETRAGrelationswithFord:GETRAG与Ford间APQPedition2withPNDslinkedtoFPDS使用第二版APQP，并建立项目要求日期与福特产品开发系统的链接GFT’srelationswithothercustomers:GETRAG与其它顾客间Thecustomerinformsusoftheirpreferredreportformat由顾客将他们所选择的报告格式通知我们PND–ProgramNeedDateFPDS–FordProductDevelopmentSystem©20.August2019,RainerKoch13Thebeginning开始TheprocessleadingtotheAPQPstatusreportbeginsassoonasasupplierhasbeenselected.只要选定了供应商，就应开始着手产生APQP状态报告的过程。ESTA=EarlySourcingTargetAgreement)(早期货源目标合同））©20.August2019,RainerKoch14FormheadingI表格标题IAdvancedProductQualityPlanningDate:2002-11-11StatusReportReviewNo.:DiamondPoint:SupplierProgramLocationModelYearSupplierCodeLeadPartNo.PartNameNew:SiteTechnologyProcessEng.LevelOtherRisksUserPlant(s)P.I.P.C.No.SC'sNo.CC's%RiskAssessmentQuantityBuildLevelConcurredP.I.S.T.%Date(MRD)GYRCoreTeamMembersCompany/TitlePhone/FaxIPDIntoPlantStatusRYGGGGGG©20.August2019,RainerKoch15FormheadingII表格标题IIAdvancedProductQualityPlanningDate:11.11.2002StatusReportReviewNo.:DiamondPoint:SupplierProgramLocationModelYearSupplierCodeLeadPartNo.PartNameNew:SiteTechnologyProcessEng.LevelOtherRisksUserPlant(s)P.I.P.C.No.SC'sNo.CC's%RYGGGGGGCoreTeamMembersCompany/TitlePhone/FaxIPDIntoPlantStatusConcurredP.I.S.T.%Date(MRD)GYRRiskAssessmentQuantityBuildLevel©20.August2019,RainerKoch16Riskassessment风险评估The4elementsofriskassessment:风险评估的四要素：1.Qualityhistory质量事件记录•TGWsetc.运行情况不良等2.Supplierprofile供方概评•InaccordancewithSTA(SIM),SupplierPerformanceAudit(800–1200points)依据STA(SIM),审核供方表现（800-1200分）3.Designprofile设计概况•Newdesignsorprocesses?新设计还是新过程？4.Targetrequirements目标要求•Degreeofdifficulty,costs,time难度、成本、时间TGW–ThingsGoneWrongSIM-SupplierImprovementMatrix©20.August2019,RainerKoch17Riskassessment风险评估©20.August2019,RainerKoch18Adjustments调整Ifoneormoreofthepointslistedintheriskassessmentapply,thecustomercanrequireallAPQPelementstobecompleted.Iftheprogrammeisclassifiedaslowrisk,thesuppliermay,byagreementwiththecustomer,omitcertainelements.如涉及风险评估列表中的单项或多项，顾客可要求完成全部的APQP要素。如果该项目确定为低风险类别，供方可通过与顾客协商，删除某些要素。GFTrequiresitssupplierstodealwithallpoints.GFT要求其供方完成风险列表中的全部项©20.August2019,RainerKoch19FormheadingIII表格标题IIIAdvancedProductQualityPlanningDate:11.11.2002StatusReportReviewNo.:DiamondPoint:SupplierProgramLocationModelYearSupplierCodeLeadPartNo.PartNameNew:SiteTechnologyProcessEng.LevelOtherRisksUserPlant(s)P.I.P.C.No.SC'sNo.CC's%RYGGGGGGCoreTeamMembersCompany/TitlePhone/FaxIPDIntoPlantStatusConcurredP.I.S.T.%Date(MRD)GYRRiskAssessmentQuantityBuildLevel©20.August2019,RainerKoch20FormheadingIV表格标题IVAdvanc