论文质量_期刊质量与期刊影响力

20109()Sep.,2010395JournalofShaanxiNormalUniversity(PhilosophyandSocialSciencesEdition)Vo.l39No.5:[]学术期刊影响力及其评价与提升等问题是近年来我国期刊界学术界关注的热点话题,有关这一话题的讨论不仅牵动着学术期刊编辑们的心,而且也关涉到高校科研院所等期刊主办单位的工作以及广大学者的切身利益,已成为摆在我国教学科研工作者和管理者面前的一道难题今年6月56日,在我校举行纪念!陕西师范大学学报∀创刊50周年庆典之际,全国高校文科学报研究会学术委员会与本刊编辑部联合在我校举办了学术期刊影响力学术研讨会来自省内外40多名专家学者围绕学术期刊影响力及其评价与提升的主题,就学术期刊质量学术期刊特色学术论文与学术期刊的影响力以及学术期刊影响力评价标准与学术期刊影响力提升等问题进行了深入广泛的交流与讨论!北京大学学报∀(哲学社会科学版)主编程郁缀常务副主编刘曙光,!复旦学报∀(社会科学版)主编黄颂杰,!文史哲∀副主编刘京希,!武汉大学学报∀(社会科学版)常务副主编车英,!现代传播∀副主编赵均,!广西民族大学学报∀主编秦红增,!山东理工大学学报∀主编尹玉吉,本刊主编张积玉等在会上发言本刊本期特从发言稿中选出3篇予以发表,以供同行研究参考程郁缀,刘曙光(,100871):,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:;;;:G236:A:1672-4283(2010)05-0064-06:2010-06-05:,,,!∀(),,;,,,,!∀(),,#∃CSSCI,,64,,,;,;,,?,,,,,,,,,,,?,%1.,2.,,,,CSSCI,3.,4.,,,,,,,,,,,[1]5.,,,,,!∀!∀!∀!∀!∀,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,65%,!∀,,,,,,,,,,,,,,20002004,606,664%[1],,,,,:(1),,????(2),,,(),6000,,#20102011∃527,172,20%,,,,#∃,#∃,,,,,,,,,[2](3)(4),[3],,,,,,,,,,,,,,#∃,,#∃,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,#∃,,,[4]66#∃,,,:#∃[5]506,,,,,,,,,,,,28,80%20%,,,,,,,,,#∃,,#∃,,#∃,,,#∃#∃,,#∃#∃,,,#∃,,#∃#∃,:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,,(),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1157531.6321.4130.1575.05581.0770.9840.1437.58721.1401.2720.2246.84850.9231.1910.22110150.0040.0120.000:!(2008)∀,,,,,,,[6],,,67[1],,#,∃,,CSSCI[7],,,,!∀!∀[8]!∀,,,,,,20002004#∃,!∀,!∀27[1]:!∀!∀,#!∀!∀∃,,(,2510),,,?,,CSSCS,,:,();,;,;,20102011!∀,:,?CSSCI?[7],CSSCI,,,:(),,,,,,,,,,:,,(),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,68,,[][1],.20002004[J].:,2006(2).[2].[J].,2010(2).[3]GISVOLDSE.?[J].,2000(5).[4].[J].,2009(4).[5],.:20[M].:,1971.[6].:[J].,2002(2).[7].#∃:[EB/OL].:2010-05-18.http:&[8].CSSCI(20042006)[J].:,2009(1).[]QualityofPapersandQualityandInfluenceofJournalsCHENGYuzhu,iLIUShuguang(EditorialDepartment,BeijingUniversity,Beijing100871)Abstract:Qualityofpapersandqualityandinfluenceofjournalsarecomplexlyandinteractivelyrelated.However,peopleinacademicandperiodicalworldsareusuallysimpleandpartialinjudgmentofqualityofpapersandassessmentofqualityofjournals.Inotherwords,theyusuallyequaltheinfluentialelementstoinfluenceofjournals,influenceofjournalstotheiracademicqualityandqualityofpapers.Asaresul,teitherjournalsordocumentmeasurementinstitutions,eitherscholarsorscientificresearchadministrators,areequallyhelplessandawkwardinfaceofthecurrentassessmentsystem.Therefore,oneofthedifficultproblemsfacinghumanisticandsocialscienceworkersandadministratorsistodevelopandcompleteajustandfairandscientificandreasonablesystemofacademicassessmentwithcombinationofquantitativeassessmentwithqualitativeassessmentsothatresearchers,disseminators,administratorsandassessorsofhumanitiesandsocialscienceswillfindthemselvesinplaceandtaketheirrespectiveresponsibilityandthathumanitiesandsocialscienceswillworkinavirtuouscircle.Keywords:qualityofpapers;qualityofjournals;influenceofjournals;assessmentofjournals69