您好,欢迎访问三七文档
当前位置:首页 > 建筑/环境 > 工程监理 > 地下车库结构选型及经济指标比较
SichuanBuildingScience4162015122014-08-111982-。E-mail85085070@qq.com2002328.1m×8.1m5.8m/5.2m×8.1m。TU93A1008-1933201506-144-04StructuralformselectionandeconomiccomparisonofundergroundgarageZHAOShifengZHOUHaiboZHOUJingShanghaiZFArchitecturalDesignCompanyShanghai200232ChinaAbstractAccordingtofunctionofbuildingtwokindsofstructurecolumnnetsareselectedtheamountofconcreteandsteelbariscomputedwithdifferentfloorsstructuresandbaseforms.Combinedwiththecorrespondingstatisticalanalysisofthecomprehensivecosttheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofvariousstructureformsarestated.Thestatisticalresultscouldbeabasisofthepreliminarydesignalsocouldprovideareferenceforthedesignofsimilarengineeringstructure.Keywordsundergroundgaragestructuralformselectioneconomiccomparison0。。。8.1m×8.1m、5.8m/5.2m×8.1m+、、。。11.11、、、C35HRB4001。26721.5m0.7kN/m210kN/m2GB50009—2012《》3。3GB50108—2008《》44.1.7250mm0.5m1.5ma0.2mm。41≥2.2m100~200mm500mm。441、、、、、。1.28.1m×8.1m5.8m/5.2m×8.1m1、2。+、、40.5m×49.2m1、23.6m3.1m。18.1m×8.1mTable1Thesizeoffloorsystemunderthe8.1m×8.1mcolumnnet/m+3.6600×600500×900—350350X3.6600×600X400×800400×800250350Y500×9003.6600×600500×900300×8002503503.1600×600——4002502900×2900×800。25.8m/5.2m×8.1mTable2Thesizeoffloorsystemunderthe5.8m/5.2m×8.1mcolumnnet/m+3.6500×500400×900—300350Y3.6500×500X400×900300×700250350Y300×7003.1500×500——3502502100×2900×750。1.3。、、。900kN350kN33。“”SLABCAD100m0.2%。①++②++。3Fig.3Theplaneandprofileofpilecaps3Table3Thesizeofwaterproofboardandcap/m/mm8.1m×8.1m3.64502500×2500×10003.14002500×2500×9005.8m/5.2m×8.1m3.64002000×2500×9003.13505412015No.62。4~9。48.1m×8.1mTable4Thesteelconsumptionunderthe8.1m×8.1mcolumnnet/kg/m2、/kg/m2/kg/m2/kg/m2+61.515.843.2119.9X56.915.843.2115.959.716.043.2118.943.514.137.995.5。58.1m×8.1mTable5Thesteelconsumptionunderthe8.1m×8.1mcolumnnet/kg/m2、/kg/m2/kg/m2/kg/m2+69.716.143.2129.0X63.416.143.2122.766.516.343.2126.050.814.337.9103.0。68.1m×8.1mTable6Theconcreteconsumptionunderthe8.1m×8.1mcolumnnet/m3/m2、/m3/m2/m3/m2/m3/m2+0.390.140.671.20X0.320.140.671.130.310.140.671.120.420.120.601.1475.8m/5.2m×8.1mTable7Thesteelconsumptionunderthe5.8m/5.2m×8.1mcolumnnet/kg/m2、/kg/m2/kg/m2/kg/m2+51.316.238.5106.0Y48.716.338.5103.536.014.636.386.9。85.8m/5.2m×8.1mTable8Thesteelconsumptionunderthe5.8m/5.2m×8.1mcolumnnet/kg/m2、/kg/m2/kg/m2/kg/m2+59.416.438.5114.3Y57.716.738.5112.939.414.836.390.5。95.8m/5.2m×8.1mTable9Theconcreteconsumptionunderthe5.8m/5.2m×8.1mcolumnnet/m3/m2、/m3/m2/m3/m2/m3/m2+0.360.130.601.09Y0.330.130.601.060.380.110.561.0534~91+、、。2+、。3。4。515%。。。。664141。4。1、、、、、23250mm4。1GB50010—2010S.2GB50011—2010S.3GB50009—2012S.4GB50108—2008S櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏櫏.14310。0.5h。1~1.5MPa。11。→→→→→、→。4。。、。1.J.200531293-96.2JGJ65—2013S.3GB50113—2005S.4.J.2011428723-724.7412015No.6
本文标题:地下车库结构选型及经济指标比较
链接地址:https://www.777doc.com/doc-4659856 .html