中国城乡最低生活保障制度对比研究

Jun.2007,Volume4,No.6(SerialNo.31)JournalofUS-ChinaPublicAdministration,ISSN1548-6591,USA11100029209022001994200623213315931200621481.200477.5%22.5%215%19【】121282.6%31200485.7%130550%93135.7%37414.3%15%842.120005%112004815%211200020041%1%5%5%10%10%200420002200331.6%200432.6%200345.9%200445.6%810052200050.8%200450%200052%200451.4%38.5%4.9%2.4%1.6%3.1%1.8%33143135.7%14.3%50%22.5%45.9%31.6%132%200331.645.922.52246.0200432.645.621.72205.0200420053%200020012002200320043209.02927.02820.02900.02610.050.852.552.049.050.034.034.031.535.535.715.213.416.515.414.352.054.751.848.851.416.918.818.618.418.531.026.529.632.830.11.2004578.760284.8%42971.3%2220002.9/20048.5/200014.116.3200042.9%54.2%552005200671.30%7.90%2.90%2.60%3%5.30%1.49%5.60%1420045%2531244169.6%1248.8751.2%6.9%11.5%660%332.80%70%80%20809064%15.7%54%58%50%68510200443.2200020.373.200264.9%33.7%[1]1.61.952.12.92.272‰620057200551.2%11.5%3.1%6.4%6.5%12.2%2.2%6.9%15649.5‰[2]208019992003220020061029.72240.1868.438.8%93.14.2%442002200620022064.7186.8358.3554.590.191.9783.120032246.8179.3409.1518.490.7100.0949.420042205.0141.0423.1468.973.195.41003.520052234.2112.5401.1432.160.295.71131.120062240.097.6420.8350.053.293.11225.320032004200520062002108.75220032003149/20066157/200358/2006675/5520032006/2003200420066149581526515775200420052006161998200082004102200029.6200470.92005190.766200020022003200420058.046.0108.0102.029.659.350.070.9190.719942006232133200448820061593326%7200525.13.8200454.98302006325.8775.8503.3720022003200420052006627.0637.0668.0683.0693.0——9.316.225.155.5407.8367.1488.0825.01593.08171.84199685.92000402.620011170.72002220010020032003149/2006169.6/200358/200683.6/54587.9184.1265.9402.61170.72064.72246.822052234.22240.13.5109.444.451.4190.876.48.8-1.91.30.30501000150200025001997199819992000200120022003200420052006人数-5005010152025年增长率149581526515672169.683.60501001502002502003200420052006182.20039.3200655.562007635.6702003367.1200615933.4.1.2.4002060%70%[3]3.30169200630001015934.12910300019300030/1202005350001200.5%3%120`[1].[M].2004.[2].[Z]..[3].[M].2006.20ComparisonoftheminimumsubsistenceguaranteesysteminChinesecityandcountryFEIPing,HEPingAbstract:BasedontheobjectiveanalysisonthepovertysituationinChinesecityandcountry,thisarticledoesacomparingresearchoftheminimumsubsistenceguaranteesysteminChinesecityandcountryfromthreeaspects:thecoverageextent;thesecuritylevel;thefundinvestment.ItdesignatestheefficiencyoftheminimumsubsistenceguaranteesysteminChinesecityandcountryasconcernsthesocialreliefbutatthesametimeitalsopointsoutthatwestillfacemanyproblemssuchastheimbalanceofthedevelopmentoftheminimumsubsistenceguaranteesysteminChinesecityandcountry,thedeficiencyoffinancialinvestmentandsoon.Atlast,theauthorgivessomesuggestionasamplifyingthereliefextentoftheminimumsubsistenceguaranteesystemincountry,increasingpublicfinancialinvestmentandimprovingtheabilityofbasicorganizationandmanagement.Keywords:poverty;theminimumsubsistenceguaranteesystemincity;theminimumsubsistenceguaranteesystemincountry