夏布云硕士毕业论文正文《论量刑建议制度在我国的构建》

I论量刑建议制度在我国的构建摘要长期以来，我国对于量刑建议制度在法律上没有进行明文规定，在司法实践中对其又有不同的理解和认识，致使其长期在司法实践中难以全面顺利地开展，只能在部分地区进行尝试和推行。同时，理论界对其是否应当推行和如何推行也一直存在着争论。本文从量刑建议制度的理论基础着手，并对域外两大法系国家量刑建议制度的有益经验进行了简要地阐述和评价，立足于我国刑事审判制度的现状以及量刑建议制度在我国部分地区的试点运行情况，对量刑建议制度在我国具体构建的必要性和可行性进行研究分析，在此基础之上，对我国量刑建议制度的具体构建进行了深入的探讨，并提出了一定的构想。本文由四部分组成，第一部分是对量刑建议制度进行了概括性地叙述。首先，论述了量刑建议的概念及其特征，通过对理论界各种学说进行分析和总结得出恰当的量刑建议概念；其次，对量刑建议的法律依据和理论依据进行了深入的研究，分析量刑建议存在的法理基础；最后，对量刑建议制度的价值进行了深入的研究，主要体现在公正和效率两个方面。第二部分是对域外两大法系国家的量刑建议制度进行了简要的考察分析。首先，对英美法系的代表性国家英国和美国的量刑建议制度进行了介绍；其次,对大陆法系代表性国家法国、德国和日本的量刑建议制度进行了介绍；最后，对两大法系国家的量刑建议制度进行对比分析，找出它们之间的共性和差别，并阐述了域外量刑建议制度对我国的启示。第三部分是对量刑建议制度在我国具体构建的必要性和可行性进行了深入的研究分析。首先从在我国构建量刑建议制度是对诉讼效率的追求、是对法官量刑权限的制约、对量刑规范化改革的推进以及是我国刑事诉讼制度发展的大势所趋等四个方面来分析了在我国具体构建量刑建议制度的必要性；其次，在对我国现行规范性法律文件中有关量刑建议的规定和量刑建议制度在我国的试点运行实践进行研究分析的基础上，II再加上检察官的素质已经达到操作量刑建议制度的要求，量刑建议制度的构建符合诉讼原理也符合世界的潮流等方面进行综合分析得出量刑建议制度在我国的构建是可行的。第四部分是量刑建议制度在我国具体构建的一些设想。首先，总结出了我国量刑建议制度的构建原则；其次，深刻分析了量刑建议的提出主体及其内容；再次，从量刑建议的提出时间、提出方式、提出后的处理等方面对量刑建议制度的程序设置提出了自己的见解；最后，通过对刑事审判程序在立法和司法实践上进行调整来配合量刑建议制度的运行。关键词：量刑建议；量刑公正；公诉权；制度构建IIIDISCUSSIONONTHECONSTRUCTIONOFTHESYSTEMOFSEDTENCINGPROPOSALINCHINAABSTRACTLong-termsince,ourcountryforsentencingproposalsystemnotexpresslyinthelaw,havedifferentunderstandingandknowledgetoitinthejudicialpractice,leadtoitslong-termhardtofullydevelopsmoothlyinjudicialpractice,canonlyinparttotryandpush.Atthesametime,therehasalsobeencontroversyonwhetheritshouldbepracticedandhowtoimplementinthetheoreticalcircle.Thisarticlebeginfromthetheoreticalbasisofsentencingproposalsystem,andmaketheexpoundedandevaluationtobeneficialexperienceofsentencingproposalsystemofforeigncountriesoftwoimportantlegalsystems,basedonthepresentsituationofChina'scriminaltrialsystemandpilotoperationofsentencingproposalsysteminsomeareasofourcountry,makeresearchandanalysisthenecessityandfeasibilityofsentencingproposalsysteminChina'sspecificconstructionsystem,abovethisfoundation,makethethoroughlydiscussedandputforwardsomeideastospecificconstructionofoursentencingproposalsystem.Thispaperconsistsoffourparts;thefirstpartmakesthegeneraldescriptiontosentencingproposalsystem.Firstofall,thispaperdiscussestheconceptandcharactersofsentencingrecommendations,throughtheanalysisandsummaryoftheoryoftheoreticalcircletogettheappropriatesentencingrecommendationsconcepts;Second,makethefurtherresearchtolegalbasisandtheoreticalbasisofthesentencingrecommendations,analysisthelegalbasisoftheexistenceofsentencingrecommendations;Finally,makethefurtherresearchtothevalueofthesentencingproposalsystem,whichmainlyreflectedinjusticeandefficiencytwoaspects.Thesecondpartmakeabrieflyinvestigationanalysistosentencingproposalsystemofforeigncountriesoftwoimportantlegalsystems.Firstofall,introducedtheBritainandtheUnitedStatessentencingrecommendationssystemwhicharetherepresentativecountriesofAnglo-Americanlawsystem;Second,introducedtheFrance,GermanyandJapansentencingrecommendationssystemwhicharethecontinentallawsystemcountryrepresentative;Finally,makeaIVcomparativeanalysisofthecountriesoftwoimportantlegalsystemsofsentencingsuggestionsystem,findoutofthecommonanddifferencebetweenthem,andexplainstheenlightenmentthatthesentencingproposalsystemofforeigncountriestoourcountry.ThethirdpartoffurtherresearchanalyzesthenecessityandfeasibilityofsentencingrecommendationssysteminChina'sspecificconstruction.Firstofall,fromourbuildingsentencingrecommendationssystemsarethepursuitoftheefficiencyoflawsuit,thejudgesentencingauthorityrestriction,sentencingstandardizationreformandanirresistibletrendinChina'scriminallitigationsystemdevelopmentandsoonfouraspectstoanalyzethenecessityofspecificconstructingsentencingrecommendationssysteminourcountry;Secondly,Basedonrelevantrulesofsentencingrecommendationsandresearchandanalysissentencingrecommendationsofthesysteminthepilotoperationpracticeinourcurrentnormativelegaldocuments,andthequalityofprosecutorshavereachedtherequirementsoftheoperatingsentencingproposalsystem,theestablishmentofsentencingproposalsystemaccordwithlitigationprincipleandthetrendoftheworld,etcandComprehensiveanalysistheconstructionofthesentencingproposalsysteminChinaisfeasible.ThefourthpartissomeproposalsofsentencingproposalsysteminChina'sconcreteconstruction.Firstofall,summarizesthesentencingproposalsysteminourcountryconstructionprinciples;Secondly,deeplyanalyzingthemainbodyoftheproposedanditscontent;Again,fromthetime,wayandafterprocessingofsentencingrecommendations,etcputforwardhisownopinionstoProgramSettingsofsentencingproposalsystem.Finally,getthroughtoadjustthecriminaltrialprocedureinthelegislativeandjudicialpracticetocooperatewiththeoperationofsentencingproposalsystem.KEYWORDS：Sentencingproposal；Sentencingjustice；Rightofprosecution；SystemconstructionV目录序论.........................................................1第一章量刑建议制度概述........................................3第一节量刑建议的概念与特征...................................3一、量刑建议的概念.........................................3二、量刑建议的特征.........................................4第二节量刑建议的法理依据.....................................5一、量刑建议的法律依据........