行为保全制度比较研究与我国的立法建构

上海交通大学硕士学位论文行为保全制度比较研究与我国的立法建构姓名：宋晖申请学位级别：硕士专业：法律指导教师：叶永禄20071201COMPARATIVESTUDYONACTPRESERVATIONSYSTEMANDLEGISLATIVECONSTRUCTIONINCHINAABSTRACTThesystemofpreservationisdesignedtomaintaintheexecutionofjudgmentsandordersandtoprotectthelawfulrightsandinterestsofthepartiesfromunrecoverabledamagescausedbycontinuoustort.Taketheobjectwhichpreservedasthestandard,thesystemmaybedividedintopropertypreservationandactpreservation.Civilpreservationsystemexistsinthelawsofdifferentcountriesmoreorless,suchasconservatorymeasuresincontinentallawsystemandinterlocutoryjunctioninthecommonlaw.Intherevisionofthecivilprocedurallawofourcountry,thepropertypreservationsystemisstillstipulated.Forthissystemisonlyapplicabletopropertynottoacts,suchaloopholeinlegislationresultsinagreatdealoffactthatthepartiescannotbeaidedbythissysteminpractices.ThelegislativebodiesandSupremePeoplesCourtofourcountryhaveintroducedthecurrentmaritimemandatoryorderandinteriminjunctionbeforetheinstitutionofanactioninmaritimelitigationandintellectualpropertylitigation.Whenthescholarsdiscussedtherevisionofthecivilprocedurelaw,theymostlyagreedtotheproposalthatweshouldsetupactpreservationinthenewcode.However,theymentionedlittleabouthowtobuildupit.Sothispapercomparesandanalyzesactpreservationsystemandproceduralremedywaysincurrentcivilprocedure,andthencombiningtheideasofcivilprocedurelawrevisionexperts,whosuggestperfectingandreformingpropertypreservationsystemandactpreservationsystem,boldlyputsforwardtheideasofconstructingactpreservationsystem.Besidesintroductionandconclusion,thisarticleisdividedintoshreesections.Sectiononeintroducesthebasictheoriesoncivilactpreservationsystem.Thispartgivesthedefinitionofactpreservationanddescribesthenatureofit,valueanalysisandthehistoricalcourse.Sectiontwodiscussestheactpreservationsystembycomparing.Inthispart,Conservatorymeasuresincontinentallawsystemandinterlocutoryjunctioninthecommonlaw,interimmeasuresinWTOagreement.Sectionthreediscussesthelegislativeconstructionofactpreservationsysteminourcountry.Firstthemaincontentofthispartistocomparesomeprocedureremedywaysinthecivilactionlaw,suchaspropertyconservation,prejudgmentexecutionandenforcement,withtheactpreservationsystem.Andthenconcludesthemeaningofsettingupactpreservationsysteminourcountry.Thesecondthispartexplainstheideasintheexpertssuggestionmanuscriptsofcivilprocedurelawrevision,andbringsupdetailedsuggestiononlegislativeconstruction.Intheory,thispapernotonlyconcernsabouttheguidingofvalue,purposeandprincipleofthewholecivillitigation,butalsopaysattentiontotheuniquecharacteristicsoftheactpreservationsystemitself.Insystem,itnotonlyusesforeignrelativeregulationsforreference,butalsobasesonthecurrentsituationofcivilpreservationsystemofourcountry.Finallyittriestoformadualsystematicframeforourcivilpreservationsystemthatlaysequalstressonpropertypreservationandactpreservation.KEYWORDS:actpreservationcomparativestudysystemconstruction2007128200712820071281199149WTO11[]199688322342199431632001420026200514199713567519962286200517200318248910D111281987166920011641016516711D19963212200322285131414151970151950136200147414200298315218616171620017617200112107,1812,,,,19,,;,20216565C18200222319197562220,1991,26421200245822940232219972912320012599484492248088118122526WTOTRIPSTRIPS2750241999979925199726027626200026727727WTO200166102828WTO2003591120007129,,,20008256112939699200165117920017120011027499396291220021012124620021015200011221144200312231302200417200110215712939699200112251203200212230313020032223124213323312345341232200710282008413320045342006102614345353635200513620026931041537TRIPS200338123720014394138()2005116112512621273393916317401,,,2,3411,1998720,,,217,,,402004319241199721513183,,,42,,45,,,,,43,,,,424319,1,,,,2,4432007101,,,,,,,44[]1998200032020,,35,,,1,,,,,,,,2,,,,(1),(2)(3)15,,,454518792122[1],1991264[2]2002,223[3]2001259[4]165167[5]D199632[6]1997260276[7]19999799[8]2001164[9]1997264[10]1996228[11]1987166[12]2002983[13][]1996883[14]2000267277[15]WTO200359[16],WTO200166[17][]19982000320[18]2003222[19]1997513[1]2001043941[2]200302228[3]199701[4]62001474[5]200204523[6]200403192[7]20061026[8]200501[9]20020693104[10]19940316[11]20011210[12]200405[13]200176[14]20030182[15]200104[16]20051[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]2425[1]20050815-18[2]20060516-19行为保全制度比较研究与我国的立法建构作者：宋晖学位授予单位：上海交通大学相似文献(10条)1.期刊论文王雁.WANGYan发挥调解作用提高民事诉讼调解实效-温州职业技术学院学报2009,9(2)民事诉讼调解作为我国一项重要法律制度,在构建和谐社会中发挥着越来越重要的作用.随着社会主义市场经济的不断深入,公民的民事权益之争越来越复杂多样化,如何提高民事诉讼中调解的实效显得尤为重要.全面、准确储存和了解调解案件信息,充分发挥法官的调解作用,采取适当的调解方法,可以提高民事诉讼的调解实效.2.学位论文倪丁彪民事诉讼中诉的利益研究2007近年来，随着我国社会经济的发展和公民权利意识的觉醒，各种新型纠纷层出不穷，类似于“亲吻权”、“悼念权”、“正常收视权”的诉讼案件也逐渐进入了司法审判和大众的视野。而面对这些并没有直接在实体法上加以规定的民事权利，应当如何从司法实践的角度来加以判断和认定，就成为了摆在我国司法人员面前的一个不小的难题。诉的利益作为民事诉讼法上的一个传统概念，此时又引起了学者们的重视和深入探讨。本文主要从分析诉的利益的性质、功能、种类等方面入手，对引进诉的利益在立法操作上的可能性、在实践中的具体运用和认定以及如何对诉的利益进行审理和裁判加以研究。本文分为四个部分。第一章是对民事诉讼中诉的利益作一概述，对诉的利益理论的起源和发展、诉的利益的概念、诉的利益的种类进行了介绍，明确了诉的利益是指当民事权益受到侵害或者与他人发生民事纠纷时，需要运用民事诉讼予以救济的必要性。同时在外延上，将禁止重复起诉、确定判决的效果、其他程序的前置等已经发展成为民事诉讼单独分支的制度排除出诉的利益的范围。第二章是对诉的利益的本质和功能方面的研究，认为诉的利益兼顾国家和当事人二者的利益，