贵州省垃圾填埋场渗滤液处理效果及工艺技术的比较潘军

。[1]。。、、、[2-3]。3900“”。、、、。GB16889－1997[4]。GB16889－2008[5]。。11.1、A、B、C、D。A300B、C100D30。A12aB1aC7aD2a、。4。1.2CODHACHDR/2010BOD5BOD-220ANH3-N、TP、TNNH3-NTPTN[6]。12111.5500812.55000142001－2012。COD0.5～4.8g/L。GB16889－20082MBR+UF+RO。。ROX703.1A1000-3770(2014)11-00[e-mail][e-mail]4011201411TECHNOLOGYOFWATERTREATMENTVol.40No.11Nov.,20149122.1A、B、C、D1。1B、DA、CBDBD。B、D2aNH3-N、TN。A、C7aB、D。B、CBCODCCBCB。NH3-NNH3-NC/NNH3-N。2.2COD、BOD5NH3-N2[7-12]。2GDP1000mm92%。。2.32.3.13。3A、C、DCOD、NH3-N95%。BCOD4800mg/L1700mg/L65%NH3-N1400mg/L300mg/L78%。BA/O55%～75%COD1700mg/LGB16889－1997。AA/OCOD2840mg/L1280mg/LUF+NF+ROCOD80mg/L。C、DUFNFCCOD1200mg/L100mg/LD4000mg/L100mg/LC、DGB16889－200822。ABCD2.0～3.04.0～4.80.5～1.22.5～4.01.5～2.01.3～1.40.4～0.71.0～1.41.8～2.11.5～1.70.55～0.70.9～1.58.0～1210.5～133.5～5.07.0～101000200056816001Tab.1TheleachatewaterqualityinsomecountiesofGuizhouprovinceCOD/(g·L-1)ρ(NH3-N)/(g·L-1)ρ(TN)/(g·L-1)ρ(TP)/(mg·L-1)/COD/(g·L-1)BOD5/(g·L-1)ρ(NH3-N)/(g·L-1)2Tab.2ComparisonoflandfillleachatebetweenparticialcitiesathomeandabroadwithmainurbaninGuizhouprovince1415～254～378621.3～26.942.0～4.80.611.0～150.6～28739.25～11.650.8～2.02.6180.4～1.50.1～1.01.751.635～1.811.0～2.0COD/(mg·L-1)ρ(NH3-N)/(mg·L-1)3Tab.3ContrastivetableoflandfillsandleachatetreatmentsABCD“2008”GB16889－20082“1997”GB16889－1997。A/O+UF+NF+ROA/OMBR+UF+ROMBR+NF+RO50～801700～200030～6050～7025～60300～40015～3010～302008199720082008401192。2.3.24。4A、BAB。AA/OCOD2840mg/L1280mg/LCOD11500/tCOD10417/t。BCOD1700mg/L。A、C、DBCOD6568/t、5505/t、5789/tB5150/tC。3、、Fenton、、、、、、。、、·OH·OH、[14]。MohajeriFentonpH3[H2O2]/[Fe2+]1COD94.7%、95.83%[15]。Mn2O3-CeO2/A12O3、580℃、34MPa、70s、2.5COD98.85%[16]。。“、、”。4A、C、DGB16889－20082。MBR+UF+RO。。、。。[1].[J].,2009,27(S1):166-168.[2].[J].,2005,27(5):358-362.[3].[J].,2011,11(8):249-251.[4]GB16889－1997[S].[5]GB16889－2008[S].[6]《》.[M].4.:,2002.[7].[J].,2005,21(12):27-31.[8],,.[J].,1998,11(1):25-28.[9]RenouS,GivaudanJG,PoulainS,etal.Landfillleachatetreatment:reviewandopportunity[J].JournalofHazardousMaterials,2008,150(3):468-493.CODNH3-NABCD30～3515～1824～2827～30104175150223506960157971030038175197844Tab.4Runningcostandtonsofpollutants'reducedemissioncostineachlandfillleachatetreatment/(·t-1)93EXPERIMENTALSTUDYONTHETREATMENTOFTAILWATERININDUSTRIALSEWAGEPLANTSBYTHEPROCESSOFUF-ROHuangLei1,SunWenquan1,ChenYong2,XuYanhua1,YeQinqin1,2(1.SchoolofEnvironment,NanjingTechUniversity,210009;2.JiangsuProvincialAcademyofEnvironmentalScience,210036:Nanjing,China)Abstract:Basedonthepilotscaleexperiment,theexperimentwascarriedoutandlastedabout2.5mouthssoastoinvestigatethecharacteristicsandtheeffectofultrafiltrationandreverseosmosis(UF-RO)processontreatingtailwaterinindustrialsewageplantswithtailwaterinaindustrialsewageplantinYixing,Jiangsuasexperimentalrawwater.Theresultsshowedthat,theaverageremovalratesofCOD,TN,UV254,turbidityandconductivityofrawwaterbyUFprocesswereabove14.45%,9.41%,8.19%,89.49%and3.42%respectively;thentheaverageremovalratesofCOD,TN,UV254,turbidityandconductivitywereabove91.34%,96.81%,99.99%,105.2%and98.91%respectivelybyROprocess.ThereforeitwasrevealedthatUF-ROwasaneffectiveandpracticalprocessforadvancedtreatmentoftailwaterinindustrialsewageplants.Keywords:ultrafiltration;reverseosmosis;tailwaterinindustrialsewageplant;advancedtreatment[1]DarwishM.Criticalcomparisonbetweenenergyconsumptioninlargecapacityreverseosmosisandmultistageflashseawaterdesaltingplants[J].Desalination,1987,63:143-161.[2]Al-MutazI,SolimanM,DaghthemA.Optimimdesignforhybriddesaltingplant[J].Desalination,1989,76:177-187.[3]AwerbushL,MayS,Soo-HooR.etal.Hybriddesaltingsystems[J].Desalination,1989,76:189-197.[4]AJRachwal,JKhow,JSColbourne,etal.Watertreatmentforpublicsupplyinthe1990's:aroleformembranetechnology[J].Desalination,1994,97:427-436.[5]GB18918－2002[S].[6].[J].,2008,28(4):83-84.COMPARISONOFLANDFILLLEACHATETREATMENTANDPROCESSINGTECHNOLOGYINGUIZHOUPROVINCEPanJun1,2,LiJingjing2,DongZeqin2(1.GuizhouProvinceEnvironmentalScienceResearchandDesignInstitute,550081;2.CollegeofGeographyandEnvironmentalScience,GuizhouNormalUniversity,550001:Guiyang,China)Abstract:Fourlandfillsthatbuiltduring2001－2012andtheirleachatetreatmentprocesseswereinvestigatedandsurveyedinGuizhouprovince.Thewaterqualityoflandfillleachatewasanalyzed,andtheleachatequalitycharacteristicswerecomparedwithotherregions.TheresultsshowthattheconcentoforganicmatterinlandfillleachateislowerinGuizhou,theconcentrationofCODisduring0.5~4.8g/L.Thenthelandfillleachatetreatmentofpartlandfillwasprocess.TheresultsshowedtheeffluentcanreachtheGB16889－2008table2requirementsofthestandardsforpollutantsdischarge.Bycomparing,theselectionofMBR+UF+ROcombinationprocessforwasteleachatetreatmentisoptimal.Inthispaper,thesuitabilityofadvancedoxidationtechnologyprocessingoflandfillleachatewasdiscussed,whichsuggestthatenergeticallyexplorethecementkilntechnologyonhouseholdgarbagetreatment.Keywords:waterquantityandqualityofleachate;leachatetreatmenttechnology;membranetreatmenttechnology;advancedoxidation