13.博士研究生学位论文选题报告及工作计划

博士研究生学位论文选题报告及工作计划DissertationProposalandWorkingPlanforDoctoralDegree课题名称DissertationTitle___________________________学号StudentID________________________________研究生CandidateName____________________________专业Major____________________________________所在院、系School/Department_______________________导师Supervisor_______________________________选题时间DateofProposalSelection__________________同济大学研究生院GraduateSchoolofTongjiUniversity年月日///(mm/dd/yy)TONGJIUNIVERSITY1．研究问题Researchquestion1）在预研究的基础上提出具有创新性的科学问题Defineandclarifyaspecificresearchquestionbasedonpreparatoryresearch2）课题来源、选题依据和背景情况Statetherationaleandcomprehensiveresearchbackground3）课题的研究目标以及理论意义和实际应用价值Identifytheresearchpurposesandsignificanceofthestudy2．文献综述（不得少于3000字）Literaturereview(nolessthan3000words)1）国内外在该研究方向的研究现状及发展动态Currentstudiesathomeandabroadandfuturedirectionsfortheresearch2）研究问题在本学科的地位、前沿性特征与价值，Importanceandsignificanceoftheresearch3）研究领域里尚未解决的问题及其原因或瓶颈Unsolvedproblems,withpossiblecausesorbottlenecks,inearlierstudies4）研究问题的创新性Originalityoftheresearch附:参考文献Attachment：References序号Order文献目录（作者、题目、刊物名、出版时间、页次）Documents(author,title,journalname,timeofpublicationandpage)3．研究内容Descriptionsofthestudy明确研究对象、研究内容及研究范围Identifytheobject,researchcontents,andscopeofthestudy4．拟解决的关键技术或问题Keypointsoftechnologicalissuestobesolved明确研究中的关键学术或技术难点，提出解决的方法Identifycrucialacademicortechnologicaldifficultiesandsuggestpossiblesolutions5．研究方法Researchmethodology1）选择科学的研究方法，制订完整的技术路线Choosescientificresearchmethodandsetacompletetechnicalroute2）研究方案的可行性分析，预设研究中可能遇到的难点，提出解决的方法ProjectFeasibility,potentialdifficulties,andpossiblesolutions6．预期成果和结论Expectedoutcomesandconclusions对研究问题的解答进行科学预设，提出预期的创造性成果Systematicandreasonablepredictionofthestudy’soutcomesandconclusions7．研究基础Researchconditions1）科学评估研究条件和实验条件以及自己的专业基础和导师的专业把控能力Properandrealisticassessmentsofresearchconditionsandexperimentalfacilitiesaswellasyourprofessionalknowledgeandyoursupervisor’sexpertise2）所需经费，经费来源，开支预算（工程设备、材料须填写名称、规格、数量）Fundsneeded,sourceoffunds,expenditureandbudget(name,specificationsandquantityoftheengineeringequipmentandmaterialneededshouldbeincluded)8．工作计划（含实验、实践、写作）Researchplan(experiments,practice,andwriting)序号Order阶段及内容StagePlan工作量估计（时数）Workload(hrs)起讫日期Periods阶段成果形式Outcomes合计Total9．同济大学博士研究生学位论文开题报告评分表Researchproposalassessmentrubric评审项目Criteria权重Value(%)评分标准Markingcriteria得分Scoring(百分制)(100scale)A.研究问题Researchquestion20%80~100分研究问题明确，具有很强的理论意义或实用价值，并预期将获得重大的社会、经济、文化影响。Clearlystatedresearchquestionwithsignificanttheoreticalsignificanceorpracticalvalueaswellasexpectedimportantsocial,economic,andculturalconsequences.60~80分研究问题明确，具有较强的理论意义或实用价值，并预期获得较大的社会、经济、文化影响。Establishesaresearchquestionoftheoreticalsignificanceorpracticalvalueaswellasexpectedsocial,economicandculturalinfluence.60分以下研究问题不明确。Nospecificresearchquestion;vagueanddifficulttounderstand.B.文献阅读量Readinglist10%80~100分文献阅读量在100篇以上，外文文献占50%。Readingcoversmorethan100referencebooksandarticles,50%ofwhichareforeignlanguagereferencebooksandarticles.60~80分文献阅读量在50篇以上，外文文献刊占30%。Readingcoversmorethan50referencebooksandarticles,3o%ofwhichisforeignlanguagereferencebooksandarticles.60分以下文献阅读量在50篇以下。Readingcoversnomorethan50referencebooksandarticles.C.文献综述Literaturereview10%80~100分报告内容全面阐述该研究方向的现状和发展动态。Narrativeintegratescomprehensivelybothcriticalandlogicaldetailsandresearchdirectionsfromthetheoreticalandresearchliteraturerelatedtotheproposedstudy.60~80分报告内容基本跟踪该研究方向的现状和发展动态。Narrativeintegratesproperlybothcriticalandlogicaldetailsandresearchdirectionsfromthetheoreticalandresearchliteraturerelatedtotheproposedstudy.60分以下综述一般，未达到上述标准。Narrativeisvagueorambiguous,notreachingtheabove-mentionedstandards.D.创新性Originality30%80~100分研究问题/成果前沿，研究成果具有很强的创新性。Articulatesup-to-dateresearchquestions/results;outcomesarehighlyoriginal.60~80分研究问题属本学科的发展方向，有自己独特的思考、并具有一定的创新性。Researchquestionsareformedinthefutureresearchdirectionofthediscipline;discussionsrevealuniquethinking;outcomesaresomewhatoriginal.60分以下研究成果的创新性不明显。Researchoutcomeslackoriginality.E.研究方法Researchmethodology20%80~100分研究方法科学合理，条理清楚，针对性强。Researchmethodsaresystematicandreasonable;proceduresarecoherent,appropriateandpertinent.60~80分制定了明确的研究方法，有针对性。Researchmethodsarespecificandpertinent.60分以下研究方法不明确。Researchmethodsarenotspecific.F.报告表达Presentation10%80~100分报告严密、逻辑性强、文字流畅，表达清楚。Writtenproposalisclear,conciseandfluent.60~80分基本概念清晰、层次分明。表达较清楚。Proposaliswellwrittenwithdefinitionsofbasicconcepts;argumentsaredelineated.60分以下Under60表达较差。Proposalisnotwellwritten.总分Totalscore总分=0.2A+0.1B+0.1C+0.3D+0.2E+0.1FTotalscore=0.2A+0.1B+0.1C+0.3D+0.2E+0.1F注：评审专家按百分制在六项指标每一栏的最后一列内打分。Note:Assessorsawardavalueona100scaleforeachofthesixassessmentcriteria.评审小组组成：AssessmentCommitteeMembers组成AssessmentCommittee姓名Name职称Professionaltitle单位Organization组长Director成员CommitteeMembers注：此评分表作为博士研究生课程成绩单必备的材料之一Note:Thisassessmentrubricisrequiredaspartofeachdoctoralstudent’academictranscript.10．评审意见AssessmentConclusions导师（或导师组）对本课题的评价Commentsfromthesupervisor(ordissertationcommittee)导师签名：年月日SignaturebySupervisor：//(mm/dd/yy)评审小组的审查结论Conclusionfromtheasses