胶州湾的重金属污染研究

R#$R%&48/2005/29/1R#$R%&1,212(1.266003;2.266071)CuCdPbCdHgPb;;X55A1000-3096(2005)01-0048-061950[1～3]81120º04'～120º23'35º58'～36º18'27.8km33.3km163km423km2125km2298km264m6～7m3km211995～19994～68～1010m30m30minCdCuPb30.014×10-31.4×10-30.19×10-3mg/LHg2004-03-222004-09-30G200320-02(1970-),,,,,0532-6022846,[e-mail]#$R%&MarineSciences/Vol.29,No.1/2005490.0086×10-3mg/L320026207121km×1km22593.13.1.1CdCuPb0.1000g±0.0001g1mL113mL1000W1min160℃48h1mL5.52mL1.5mL6.2160℃12h1Fig.1ThedistributionofthesamplestationsintheseawaterofJiaozhouBay2Fig.2ThedistributionstationofthesufacesedimentsamplesofJiaozhouBayR#$R%&50/2005/29/141995～1999CuFig.4ThecontentchangeofCuelementoftheJiaozhouBayin1995～199951995～1999HgFig.5ThecontentchangeofHgelementoftheJiaozhouBayin1995～199961995～1999PbFig.6ThecontentchangeofPbelementoftheJiaozhouBayin1995～19996.280℃10h50mLCdCuPbCdCuPb,Cd20µg/g,Cu1µg/g,Pb2µg/g3.1.2Hg1+1Hg0.1000g～0.5000g25mL10mL1h2HgHg2µg/g3.2Finnigan-MATELEMENTIXGY-110A44.13～68CdCuHgPb41995199631995～1999CdFig.3ThecontentchangeofCdelementoftheJiaozhouBayin1995～1999R#$R%&MarineSciences/Vol.29,No.1/2005511×10-6Tab.1ThecontentofheavymetalinsurfacesedimentofthestationsinthepartofJiaozhouBay×10-6HgCdCuPbQDS10.0420.0922929QDS50.0190.082427QDS120.060.0932931QDS280.0510.1032631QDS400.0090.0751524QDS510.020.0311120QDS540.0430.0962629QDS560.0080.0561326QDS630.0520.0952127QDS650.0370.0691623QDS660.0330.0862029QDS670.0440.0872529QDS710.0070.022819QDS1040.010.0511222QDS1050.0130.0351020QDS1060.020.0831320QDS1070.0240.0781423QDS1340.2510.3334639QDS1470.0740.1062427QDS1480.0350.08217234.2Cd1µg/LT04T051/53CdCu41/25µg/LCuHgHg5T01T02T04T07T08Hg0.05µg/LPb1µg/L61996T071999T033Pb4.3200214.3.1CdCd0.147×10-61×10-6,0.028×10-6Cd0.02×10-6Cd72Cd≤0.5×10-63CdCd1×10-65010.5×10-67km1～2kmCd0.1×10-6Cd3CdCd4.3.2CuCu27.26×10-6137×10-6,10×3×10-6Tab.3ThecontentofheavymetalintherockaroundtheJiangzhouBay×10-6CdCuHgPb0.056417.450.0218924.990.0491319.250.0231719.490.0473219.490.0180319.060.0484718.080.0188521.152×10-6Tab.2Thenationalstandardofthecontentofheavymetalinthesurfacesediment×10-6HgCdPbCu10.20.5603520.51.5130100315250200R#$R%&52/2005/29/110-6Cu35×10-62100×10-6Cu55×10-6CuCuCu20×10-6～40×10-6Cu3CuCuCu1.4×1044.3.3HgHg0.08×10-60.59×10-6,0.006×10-6Hg0.08×10-6HgHg≤0.2×10-6293Hg2Hg0.1×10-6～0.05×10-6HgHg3HgHg105Hg4.3.4PbPb30.87×10-663×10-6,20×10-6Pb13×10-6Pb2.4Pb≤60×10-62)Pb30×10-6～35×10-6PbPb3PbPbPbPb5.5×1034.4(1)43～5(2)(3)(4)CdCuHgPb[1].[J].,199622(1)77-81.[2].[J].19978(6)650-654.[3].[J].200114(1)76-80.[4].[J].200055(4)449-458.[5].[J].200019(3)14-22.[6].[J].199716(1)18-22.[7].[J].R#$R%&MarineSciences/Vol.29,No.1/200553ThestudiedoftheheavymetalpollutionofJiaozhouBayXUXiao-da12LINZhen-hong1LIShao-quan2(1.OceanUniversityofChina,Qingdao266003,China2.TheQingdaoInstituteofMarineGeologyoftheLandandNaturalResourcesMinistry,Qingdao266071,China)Received:Mar.,22,2004Keywords:JiaozhouBay;heavymetalpollution;sufacesedimentsampleAbstractBasedontheanalysisofcontentsofheavymetalsinseawaterandthesurfacesedimentsamples,theauthorsstudiedthecurrentstateanddevelopmenttendencyoftheheavymetalcontaminationintheJiaozhouBay.Com-paredtheheavymetalcontentsofseawaterandsurfacesedimentwiththevaluesofthetateenvironmentalstandards.CuandCdcontentsintheseawaterofJiaozhouBayaccordedwiththefirst-classstandard,butPbrunsmuchbeyondthestandard.Inthesurfacesedimentsamplesfromtheeastofthebay,thecontentsofCd,HgandPbweremuchhigherthanthethestatefirst-classstandard,andtheareafromDagangtoLicunestuarywasthemaincontaminatedregion.Thecontaminantmetalsmainlycomesfromterrigenousmaterials,whichwerecarriedintotheseabyrivers.InthecentralpartoftheJiaozhouBaytheenvironmentconditionsweregood,becausetheheavymetalconcentswerelowerthanthestatestandards.()19855(2)129-139.[8].[M].19924.[9].[J].199716286-90.[10].[M].1984.1-286.[11].[J].1990204107-114.[12].[J].200217(1)69-77.[13]DecarloEHSpencerKJ.RecordsofleadandotherheavymetalsinputtosedimentsoftheAlswaiCanalHawaii[J].PcaTechol19954947-49.[14]AbrahimGParkerR.Heavy-metalcontaminantsinTamakiEstuaryimpactofcitydevelopmentandgrowthAuklandNewZealand[J].EnvironmentalGeology200242883-890.