您好,欢迎访问三七文档
PublicinvestmentandhighereducationinequalityBerardinoCesiyUniversityofRomeTorVergataJanuary26,2006AbstractEmpiricalresultsshowthatchildrenfromhighincomehouseholdsachievehigherlevelsofeducationandaremorelikelytobeenrolledinpostcompulsoryschool.Theoretical ndingsfailtoanswerclearlywhethergreaterpublicinvestmentinthehighereducationsysteme¤ectivelyde-creasestheinequalitybetweentheeducationalattainmentofrichandpoorchildren.Weshowthatifthechildreceivesamonetarytransferfromhisparentsandallocatesitbetweenprivateconsumptionandinvestmentinprivateadditionaleducation,thenafurtherpublicinvestmentdecreasestheeducationalgap.Thisresultholdsundertheassumptionsofbothsub-stitutabilityandcomplementaritybetweenprivateandpubliceducation.Keywords:Highereducationinequality;Publiceducation;AltruismJELclassi cation:H31;H52;I21;J24IamdeeplyindebtedtoGianniDeFrajaforallhissupportandguidance.IwouldalsothankAlbertoIozziforthehelpinmakingthispaperpossible.CommentsfromtheparticipantsattheWorkshopCo nproject2004attheUniversityofMilanL.Bocconiaregratefullyacknowledged.IwishtothankSimeonColeman,KavitaSirichand,RebeccaWindwood,RebeccaDalzell,theaudiencesatUniversityofChieti-PescaraandatUniversityofRomeTorVergatafortheirusefulcomments.ThispaperhasbeenwrittenduringthevisitingperiodattheUniversityofLeicesteryUniversityofRomeTorVergata,FacoltàdiEconomia,viaColumbia2,I-00133,Rome,Italy.e-mail:berardino.cesi@uniroma2.it11IntroductionThedistributionofeducationacrossindividualshasbeenoneofthemoststudiedtopicsduringthelasttwodecades.Empiricalandtheoreticalevidencecon rmsthatchildrenwhoseparentsarecharacterizedbyhighlevelofincomeandhighhumancapitalaremorelikelytobeenrolledatuniversityandhavebetterhighereducationattainments(see,e.g.,HavemanandWolfe,1995;Woessmann,2004;Blau,1999;Shea,2000;CameronandHeckman,2001;PlugandVijverberg,2001,2003;Taubman,2001;Blanden,GreggandManchin,2003;BlandelandMachin,2004;Callender,2003;ChevalierandLanot,2002;DeFraja,2002;ZanchiandOliveira,2003).Despitethefactthehighereducationinequalityhasbeenlargelycon rmedinseveralcountries,therearemanydoubtsabouttheexistenceofapolicyforequality.Inparticular,therestillexistconcernsaboutthereale¤ectofapolicyincreasingpublicinvestment.Thispapershowsthatincreasingpublicinvestmentinthehighereducationsystemisane¤ectivepolicytoreducetheeducationalgapbetweenstudentsfromhighandlowincomehouseholds.Wedevelopatheoreticalmodelinwhichtheeducationalattainmentbythechildistobeinterpretedashumancapital:itdependsonpublicschoolingandinvestmentinprivateeducationbyabstract-ingfromparentaleducation,studentsabilityandthee¤orttheyexertwhileatschool.Privateeducationincludestimeandprivategoodswhichincreasetheindividualhumancapital;thereforethestudentissupposedtoreceivebothpublicandprivateeducation.Weassumethathouseholdsarecomposedofonealtruisticparentandhischild;theonlywaytheparentcan nancetheedu-cationalprocessofhischildistoleaveamonetarytransfer.Weconsiderthistransferasasortofbequest.Thedecision-makersareassumedtobetwo:theparentandthechild.Theparentisthe rstmoveranddecideshowtoallo-catehisincomebetweenthebequestandhisowncurrentconsumption.Inthesuccessiveperiodthechildreceivespubliceducationandallocateshisbequestbetweenconsumptiongoodandinvestmentinprivateeducation.Theassumptionthattheinvestmentinprivateeducationisdecidedbythechilddi¤erentiatesourpaperfromthepreviousliterature(BeckerandTomes1986andNordblom2003).Weareawarethatamodelinwhichtheprivateinvestmentischosenbytheparentisappropriateforthecompulsoryschoolbutitdoesnotproperlyrepresenttheeducationalprocessworkingattheuniversitylevel.Theparentsareoftennotableto gureoutthekindofeducationalsupportthechildattendinguniversityreallyneedstoimprovehislevelofeducation.Thisdi¢cultycouldarisefromtheweakinteractionbetweenparentsandacademicsta¤(asprofessors)characterizingtheuniversitysystem.Insomecountries(suchasItalyandtheUK)thecompulsoryschoolguaranteesfrequentmeetingsbetweenparentsandteachers,butthesedonottakeplaceoncechildrengotouniversity.Furthermore,thechildsagealsomatters.Thestudentattendingcompulsoryschoolisquiteyoungandneedstheguidanceofitsparents,whilethestudentattendinguniversityisusuallyolderandthereforeabletochoosebyhimselfthetypeofprivateeducationalinvestmentheneeds.Inthelattercase,2theroleoftheparentisjusttodecidetheamountoftransferaccordingtotheownliquiditypossibilityNordblom(2003)showsthatanincreaseinpublicschoolingisnotane¤ec-tivepolicytodecreasetheinequalitybetweentheeducationofrichandpoorstudents.Shedevelopsamodelinwhichhouseholdsarecomposedofonealtru-isticparentandhischild.Theeducationlevelofthechildpositivelydependsonpublicschooling,parentalinvestmentandparentaleducation(interpretedasaccumulatedofhumancapital).Parentalinvestmentincludesexpenditureinprivateeducationofthechild(asadditionalbocks,computers,languagecoursesandprivateteaching)andamonetarytransfer(bequest).Inthismodel,publicandprivateeducationareassumedtobecomplements:anincreaseinpub-licinvestmentraisesthemarginalproductivityofparentalprivateinvestment.Nordblomde nestherichandthepoorhous
本文标题:Public investment and higher education inequality
链接地址:https://www.777doc.com/doc-3331055 .html