我国外语教学实验研究质量调查

20021341()ForeignLanguageTeachingandResearch(bimonthly)Jan.2002Vol.34No.1:,28:(1),;(2),:(1);(2),:[]H08[]A[]1000-0429(2002)01-0035-10,,,,,,,,,5,,,,1.,,,:,?(2000),,(),,,,,,53,?,,,,,,,,,,:;,,,Seliger&Shohamy(1989),Hatch&Farhady(1982),Brown(1988)Nunan(1992),,,11,,,,,,,,,,,,,(),(),,,(),,,,,6320021()(Graziano&Raulin1997;Babbie1998;Kerlinger&Lee2000),,:1,:(),(1),,,,,,,,,,,,(),,,,,,,:,:(1),,(2):,(),,2.Graziano&Raulin(1997)Kerlinger&Lee(2000),:7311,,,,,:(/)(,)(,,)(,)(,)(,)(,)8320021,:(1);(2);(3)3.3.1,,,,,(),:,,,()(),,,;,,:;3.2,1997200172,28,3.32,,()(),2:21(=28)RTLRSRQRHRDINSRPSTRI00%1657%2693%1761%2175%00%1243%00%00%:RT=;LR=;SRQ=;RH=;RD=;INS=;RP=;ST=;RI=:,,,,,,,/93,,(93%),(75%),(61%),(57%)(43%),:(1)7,3;(2)(57%),;(3),,2:,,,,;,,,,,,3.423:31(N=28)BGRH\LRRD\RHRP\RDINS\RLST\RDR\T1243%1761%1968%2796%1554%1243%1761%:BG=;RH\LR=;RD\RH=;RP\RD=;INS\RL=;ST\RD=;R\T=:(1),,(2):,,();,,,;,,,,(3):,,,0420021,,(4),,,(),(5),,,,,,,,,4(6)(,),,(ANOVA)t,,(posthoctest),(7),,,,,(adhoc),34.,,,,,,,,:(1),(,),,,(),,,,,,(2),,(unbiased)()14,,,,,,,;,;,,/,,(3),,,,,,,;,,,,,,,:,,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,();;,1.,,,;,,;,,2.7:3.,,,Ellis(1994)Ellis,,,,();,(677),2420021,4.,,,,,Babbie,E.1998.ThePracticeofSocialScience(8thEdition)[M].Belmont,CA:Wadsworth.Brown,J.D.1988.UnderstandingResearchinSecondLanguageLearning:ATeachersGuidetoStatis2ticsandResearchDesign[M].Cambridge:Cam2bridgeUniversityPress.Ellis,R.1994.TheStudyofSecondLanguageAcquisi2tion[M].Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.Hatch,E.&H.Farhady.1982.ResearchDesignandStatisticsforAppliedLinguistics[M].Cambridge:NewburyHousePublishers.Graziano,A.M.&M.L.Raulin.1997.ResearchMethods:AProcessofInquiry(3rdEdition)[M].NewYork:Longman.Kerlinger,F.&H.Lee.2000.FoundationsofBehav2ioralResearch(4thEdition)[M].Orlando:HarcourtCollegePublishers.Nunan,D.1992.ResearchMethodsinLanguageLearn2ing[M].Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.Seliger,H.W.&E.Shohamy.1989.SecondLan2guageResearchMethods[M].Oxford:OxfordUni2versityPress.,2000,[M]::28()1997/11997/31997/6Dictogloss1998/21998/2EFL1998/21998/4()1998/31998/6EFL:1998/41998/41999/21999/31999/51999/5341999/51999/52000/12000/22000/22000/32000/62000/42000/52000/42001/12001/12001/2:200187;,20011110:510420()430072()442002120021341()ForeignLanguageTeachingandResearch(bimonthly)Jan.2002Vol.34No.1AbstractsofmajorpapersinthisissueOnthearbitrarinessandiconicityoflinguisticsigns,byZhuYongsheng,p.2EversinceF.deSaussureputforwardtheprincipleofarbitrariness,manylinguistsfromhomeandabroadhaveairedchallengingviewsfromtheperspectiveoficonicity;someofthemevenassertedthaticonicityisthemostfundamentalfea2tureoflinguisticsigns.TheauthorofthepresentpaperattemptstodefendSaussurespositionbyprovingthatarbitrarinesscanbefoundinindividualsignswhereasiconicitycanbefoundincompoundandderivativewordsandinclausestructures.Thepaperconcludesthatthediscoveryoficonicitycancomplementratherthanreplacetheprincipleofarbitrariness.ReflectionsontheessenceofcategoryFromobjectivismtoexperimentalrealism,byChenWeizhen,p.8Thispaperaddressesthequestionofcategory,especiallyoftheessenceofcategory,whichhasbeenaconstanttop2icofdiscussionbyphilosophersofdifferentschools,fromobjectivismtoexperimentalrealism.Itpointsoutthat,whileAristotlesnotionofessentialpropertiesdoesnothold,Wittgenstainsdenialofcommonpropertiesofcategorymembersisnotwithoutproblems.ItfinallyarguesthatG.Lakoffsexperimentalrealism,althoughofferingapromisingapproach,isstillfarfromthefinalsolutiontotheproblemoftheessenceofcategory.Phonosemantics:thestudyofsoundandsense,byHeChuansheng,p.22Thispaperintroducesanancientyetnascentdisciplineinwesternlanguagestudiesphonosemantics,whichismainlyconcernedwiththephonemiciconicityoflinguisticsignsandcanbedefinedsimplyasthestudyofrelationbetweensoundandsense.Coveringitsphilosophicalfoundation,historyanddevelopment,studyobjectives,subjectmatter,aswellasitstheoreticalandpracticalsignificance,thepaperbelievesthatthestudyofphonosemanticswillbehelpfulinourunderstand2ingofthenatureoflinguisticsigns,inenrichingthedomainoflinguisticiconism,andinbuildingthetheoreticalparadigmofcognitivelinguistics.OptimalityTheoryandfunctionalism,byWangJialing,p.30WiththeadventanddevelopmentofOptimalityTheory,thereisarevivaloffunctionalisminphonology.Themainthesisoffunctionalisminphonologyistoseekphonologicalexplanationinthetensionbetweenclarityandease.Faithful2nessconstraintsinOptimalityTheorycanberegardedtomaintainclaritywhilemarkednessconstraintsareusedtoexpresseaseofarticulation.Therankinghierarchyofthesetwotypesofconstraintsindicatestherelationbetweenthetwo.ThusfunctionalexplanationsareexpressedbyformalisticmeansintheconstraintinteractionofOptimalityTheory.TherecentCalifornianSchoolseekstosetupadirectrelationshipbetweenconstraintsandphoneticdetails,andtoincludenumericalcomputationintoconstraintsandconstraintinteraction.AqualityevaluationofSLA/FLTexperimentalstudiesbyChineseresearchers,byWuXudong&ZhangWenzhong,p.35Thepresentstudyevaluates,withinaframeworkestablishedspecificallyforanalyzingexperiments,thequalityofSLA/FLTexperimentalstudiesconductedbyChineseresear