您好,欢迎访问三七文档
当前位置:首页 > 临时分类 > 粘性土中桥墩基础局部冲刷计算方法对比分析-梁发云
41220143HYDROGEOLOGY&ENGINEERINGGEOLOGYVol.41No.2Mar.2014梁发云1,2,王玉1,2,贾承岳1,2(1.同济大学岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海200092;2.同济大学地下建筑与工程系,上海200092)。《》“”SRICOS-EFA。。。。EFATU473A1000-3665201402-0037-072013-06-152013-08-26411722462013CB0363041976-、、。E-mailfyliang@tongji.edu.cn1~3。、。101。。1。。1。196565-165-2《》4Richardson2000HEC-181。。《》4“”SRICOS-EFA5。。15。0.5~5Pa6。1000。SRICOS-EFA。1.1。DOI:10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2014.02.021·38·2014《》4hpB1hpB1≥2.5hbhb=0.83kξB0.61I1.25LV1hpB1<2.5hbhb=0.55kξB0.61h0.1pI1.0LV2hp———mkξ———B1———mIL———0.16~1.48V———m/s。1.2SRICOS-EFA。。。Briaud72090SRICOS-EFA。。1。2SRICOS-EFAzτ。zmm/h1mmz=1t3t———1mmh。τMoody8τ=18fρV204f———Moodyρ———1000kg/m3V0———m/s。fRe0ε/D。Re0=VD/νν20℃10-6m2/sε/DεD。ε=0.5D50D500.5。SRICOS-EFAD=4A/PAP。3τmaxNurtjahyo9、、、τmaxPaτmax=kwkshkspkθ×0.094ρV21logRe-1[]105Re=Va'νa'=acosθ+La×sin()θkw=1+16exp-4Ha'ksh=1.15+7exp-4L()a'kθ=1+1.5θ()900.57ksp=1+5exp-1.1S()a'Re———a'———ma———mθ———kw———ksh———kθ———ksp———H———mS———mL———m。4z()iτmax。5ystBriaud10、、2·39·。Oh11Briaudys=2.2KwKshKLKspa'×2.6×Frpier-Frcpier0.76Kw=0.89H()a'0.33Ha'<1.431.0{Ksp=2.9S()a'-0.91Sa'<3.421.0{Frpier=Vg×槡a'Frcpier=Vcg×槡a'Vc=τcH13ρgn槡2ys———mkw———ksh———1.11.01.00.9ksp———kL———1.0Frpier———Va'Froudeg———Frcpier———Vcm/sFroudeτc———PaSRICOS-EFAn———Manning。6t0t0yst0yst()0=t01zi+t0ys7FHWA1SRICOS-EFA。22.112.1.12m6m7.89m1.4m/s0°13.96PaManning0.01848h48h6。11Fig.1Schematicplanviewofcase12.1.21SRICOS-EFAaEFA2。2EFAFig.2ErosionfunctionofsoilbyEFAtestbθ=0°a'=acosθ+La×sin()θ=a=2.0mHa'=7.892=3.945>1.43kw1.0ksh1.0kL1.0ksp1.0。FroudeFrpier=V槡g×a'=1.49.81×槡2=0.316Froude·40·2014Frcpier=Vcg×槡a'=τc×H1/3ρ×g×n槡2/g×槡a'=3.96×7.891/39.81×1000×0.018槡2/槡9.81×2=0.356ys=2.2KwKshKLKspa'×2.6×Frpier-Frcpier()0.7=2.2×1.0×1.0×1.0×1.0×2.0()×2.6×0.316-0.3560.7=2.58m=2580mmckwkw=1+16exp-4Ha'=1.0kspksp=1+5exp-1.1S()a'=1.00°kθkθ=1+1.5θ()900.57=1.0kshksh=1.15+7exp-4L()a'=1.15+7e-4.3=1.15Re=Va'ν=1.4×210-6=2800000τmax=kwkshkspkθ×0.094ρV21logRe-1[]10=1.0×1.15×1.0×1.0×0.094×1000×1.421log2800000-1[]10=11.676PadEFAτ=τmaxzi4.8mm/h3。3EFAFig.3Erosionfunctionandtheinitialerosionrateofpiere48hyst()0=t01zi+t0ys=4814.8+482580=211.5mm48h8.2%。2Kξ4B3。α=0°Kξ=0.98B1=L-()asinα+a()=6.0-2.0sin0°+2.0=2.0hpB1=7.892.0=3.945>2.5hb=0.83KξB0.61I1.25LV=0.83×0.98×2.00.6×I1.25L×1.4=1.726I1.25LIL0.16~1.48。0.175~2.818m。2.1.3SRICOS-EFA。。11.38SRICOS-EFA。SRICOS-EFA。2.222.2.1。1.22m18mN=318m5150m3.12m20°3.36m/s412。2·41·42Fig.4Schematicplanviewofcase22.2.21SRICOS-EFAaEFA10m2N/m220m4N/m25。5abEFAFig.5EFAresultsforthefirstsoillayeraandthesecondsoillayerbba'a'=Lsinθ+acosθ=18×sin20°+1.22×cos20°=7.3mHa'=3.127.3=0.43<1.43Kw=0.89H()a'0.33=0.89×3.12()7.30.33=0.672Ksh=1.1KL=1.0。Sa'=187.3=2.466<3.42Ksp=2.9S()a'-0.91=2.9×2.466-0.91=1.27Re=Va'ν=3.36×7.310-6=2.45×107ys=0.18KwKspKLKshRe0.635=0.18×0.672×1.27×1.0×1.1×2.45×1070.635=8.317m=8317mm。ckwkw=1+16exp-4Ha'=1+16e-4×3.127.3=3.9kshksh=1.15+7exp-4L()a'=1.15+7e-4181.22=1.15kθkθ=1+1.5θ()900.57=1+1.520()900.57=1.636kspksp=1+5exp-1.1S()a'=1+5e-1.1187.3=1.33τmax=kwkshkspkθ×0.094ρV21logRe-1[]10=3.9×1.15×1.33×1.636×0.094×1000×3.3621log2.45×10()7-1[]10=365.8PaEFAτ=τmaxzi7t0yst()0。2。Kξ4B5。α=20°Kξ=1.12·42·2014B1=a'=Lsinθ+acosθ=18×sin20°+1.22×cos20°=7.3mhpB1=3.127.3=0.427<2.5hb=0.55KξB0.61h0.1PI1.0LV=0.55×1.12×7.30.6×3.120.1×I1.0L×3.36=7.644ILIL0.16~1.48。1.223~11.313m。2.2.31SRICOS-EFA0.955。。31。B1。2ILSRICOS-EFA。3SRICOS-EFAFroude、。4。。SRICOS-EFA。1ArnesonLAZevenbergenLWLagassePFetal.EvaluatingscouratbridgeFifthEditionR.USDepartmentofTransportationFHWAApril2012.2WardhanaKHadiprionoFC.AnalysisofrecentbridgefailureintheUnitedStatesJ.JournalofPerformanceofConstructedFacilitiesASCE2003173144-150.3MelvilleBWColemanSE.BridgeScourM.WaterResourcesPublicationsColoradoUSA2000.4JTGC30—2002S.2002.JTGC30—2002HydrologicalSpecificationsforSurveyandDesignofHighwayEngineeringS.BeijingChinaCommunicationPress2002.inChinese5BriaudJLChenHCChangKAetal.SummaryReportoftheSRICOS-EFAMethodR.TexasA&MUniversity2011.6LiangFYBennettCRParsonsRLetal.AliteraturereviewonbehaviorofscouredpilesunderbridgesC//Inthe2009InternationalFoundationCongressandEquipmentExpoOrlandoGSP186ASCE2009482-489.7BriaudJLTingFCKChenHCetal.ErosionfunctionapparatusforscourratepredictionsJ.JournalofGeotechnicalandEnvironmentalEngineeringASCE20011272105-113.8MoodyLF.FrictionfactorsforpipeflowJ.TransactionoftheAmericanSocietyofCivilEngineers1944668671-684.9Nurtjahyo.ChimeraRNASsimulationsofpierscourandcontractionscourincohesivesoilsD.TXTexasA&MUniversityCollegeStation2003.10BriaudJLChenHCLiYetal.SRICOS-EFAMethodforComplexPiersinFine-GrainedSoilsJ.JournalofGeotechnicalandGeoenvironmentalEngineering2004130111180-1191.11OHSJ.ExperimentalstudyofbridgescourincohesivesoilD.TXTexasA&MUniversityCollegeStation2009.2·43·12BriaudJLChenHCLiYetal.Complexpierscourandcontractionscourincohesivesoils.NCHRPRep.No.24-15R.TransportationResearchBoardNationalResearchCouncil2003.AnalysisofthecalculationmethodsoflocalscourdeptharoundbridgepierinclaysLIANGFa-yun12WANGYu12JIACheng-yue121.KeyLaboratoryofGeotechnicalandUndergroundEngineeringoftheMinistryofEducationTongjiUniversityShang
本文标题:粘性土中桥墩基础局部冲刷计算方法对比分析-梁发云
链接地址:https://www.777doc.com/doc-4489946 .html