论刑事错案责任追究制度

湘潭大学硕士学位论文论刑事错案责任追究制度姓名：黎璠申请学位级别：硕士专业：刑事诉讼法学指导教师：宋世杰200504293AbstractThethesismainlydoessomeresearchaboutthepursuingsystemofthewrongcriminalcaseresponsibility,whichbasesontheresearchresultsofsomesubjectsandlegislations.Troughtheauthor'ssummaryandthinking,thethesiscarriesonsystemselaboratingtothepursuingsystemofthewrongcriminalcaseresponsibility,andputforwardsomecreativeopinions.Thepursuingsystemofthewrongcriminalcaseresponsibilityisanimportantsystemthatpunishingthecriminaljudicialpersonnel.Undertheconditionofnowadaysthatthewrongcriminalcaseoccurrence,itisadvantageoustostrengthentheresponsibilityofthejudicialpersonnel,guaranteethecitizenslegalrightsandsupporttheexactitudeandthecandorofcrimejudicatory.Atwesternnation,thepursuingsystemofthewrongcaseresponsibilityhasbeenrescindedbasically;alotoflocalscholarsalsoclaimtorescindthesystem.Thistextthinksthatthepursuingsystemofthewrongcriminalcaseresponsibilityhasalonghistoryinourcountry,thebasicstateofthenationandjudicialconditionofChinastillrequesttoinsistthesystemcurrently.ThearticlemakesuseoftheMarxismepistemologicalbasicprincipletopointoutthatthewrongcriminalcasecantbeavoided,andtriesaccordingtodifferentreasonstoclassifythewrongcriminalcase,inordertoanalyzethewrongcriminalcasefromthetinyviewangle.Theauthordiscussesandevaluatesourlawmakingcircumstance,maincontents...etc.ofthesystem,andpointsoutsystemsproblemsandirregularities.Throughintroducingandevaluatingthecurrentlawsystem,andcombiningtheconclusionofthetheoriesinfrontofthearticle,theauthorputforwardsomeproposestoperfectthesystem,andthesearealsothetextualandcreativeworthplaces.Keywords:thecriminalwrongcase;thetypeofthecriminalwrongcase;exercisethejobpowerindependentlybylaw;theresponsibilityofhandlingacriminalcase12[1],,,,[2][3][4]3,,,,4[5]56[6][7]78191124127,,,;,,;10,,,7,10,,211[8]211223[9]1331411215,345216[10]17?123[11]18[12]19[13][14][15]202121[16],,[17]:,,,,,,,22?[18]23,,,,,,,;,,,[19]24,,Justitia,Jus,,,[20],:,,,,,,,,,,,[21],1997,25,5.6%,0.25%[22],20902520011217204206()[23]26[24][25]JudicialImmunity[26][27][28]?27(JudicialIndependence)[29][30]128[31][32]2194676191929[33]33070106515[34]831432[35][36]33,,,,,,,[37]:,,:,,:;[38][39],,,:,,,,,,,34,;,,,,,[40]653,,,,,,,,,,,,,2042053043053063073520901997199871719989436199619971997127237232138[41][42]234391941995199710[43]33213403123414542728212219422015[44]434445[45]19952282001630199894200110181998717200237199619971997461995200247[46][47][48]48[49]49[50]505152[1][28][46]200061365187[2][42]161[3][41]1998751[4][5][6][7]199361254261278[8][23]19997129279[9]20041115[10]200151440[11]199810135[12]19966377[13]200191290[14]199824[15]200412110[16][50]199842589[17][48]1997310453[18]:20013132[19]200181269[20].,2000524[21]:2001120[22]2000118[24]1999362[25]2000627[26][29].G.1998119103[27][44]200231142141[30],2000650[31]19978156[32]200111146[33]200112126[34]20044148[35]1998440[36]1999541184[37][39]8384[38][40]200332931[43]20011242[45][49]200111453455[47]1998161755[1].[M].:,2000.[2].[M].:,2001:187-365.[3].[M].:,2002:33-125.[4].[M].:,1993.[5].100[M].:,2004.[6].[M].:,2002:9-416.[7].[M].:,2003.[8].[M].:,2002.[9][],.[M].:,2000:3-60.[10],.[M].:,2001:1-316.[11].[M].:,1994.[12].[M].:,1990:1-326.[13].[M].:,2000.[14].[C]..:,2002:3-149.[15].[M].:,2004.[16].[M].:,2003.[17][]E,.[M].:,1999.[18],.[M].:,2002:1-290.[19].[M].:56,2002:1-244.[20],.[M].:,1999:16-212.[21].[J].,1996,2.[22].,[J].,1996,2.57[1],,5812[2],,,,59,,,1234[3]60[1]200061365187[2]1998425[3]20023114214161ThetheoryoftheinvestigationsystemofthewrongcriminalresponsibilityAThewrongcaseandthewrongcriminalcaseresponsibilityThewrongcasemeansjudicialpersonnelbreachesthelawbecauseofthesubjectivefaultinthepertainingtocrimelitigationprocess,causingtheentityortheproceduremistake,resultinthecaseoftheimportantdamagetothenationorthepartyconcernedbenefits.[1]Thewrongcaseresponsibilityisjudicialpersonneltoresultinthewrongcaseofthepertainingtocrimeshouldundertakeofrelevantdisciplineup,morallyorjuridicalresponsibility,itisakindoffaultresponsibility,keepinggoingtobesubjectedtothepunishmentorthepunishmentthatshouldhave.thewrongcaseorthepertainingtocrimeisthepremiseandfoundationthatthewrongcaseresponsibilitypursues,butthewrongcaseresponsibilityisinevitableextensionofthewrongcasenot.Thesetwoproblemsshouldbeseparatedtoconsider,toavoideachotherthebadinterferenceofandconfuse.TheMarxistepistemologythinksthatknowthesystemcontainmenttheunderstandingthecorpusandknowabodyandknowtowintoliethesethreebasicsub-systems,threeconstitutedtoknowthesystemofanessentialelement.Onlywhentheobjectivereflectionabodyoftheunderstandingcorpus,theunderstandingthencanberight;Iftheunderstandingofthecorpusoutofaccordancewiththeactualcircumstanceofabody,theunderstandingwillappearthemistake.Inthepertainingtocrimelitigationprocedureofinvestigation,suing,judgingetc.allthebodywearsthesephilosophiesstandpointandmethodnow.Passtoonlythethingdialecticalanalysisthatdoctrineisepistemological,wecansee,thewrongcaseofthepertainingtocrimewillbetheoppositionnoodlesofthetruthisappearedinagainandagaininthe