您好,欢迎访问三七文档
当前位置:首页 > 行业资料 > 冶金工业 > MBR与MBBR工艺处理玉米深加工废水的对比分析闫海红
37《》2013-04-012013-05-222012ZX07202-009-011981-yanhh@craes.org.cn*、nianyg@craes.org.cn。EnvironmentalScience&Technology37120141Vol.37No.1Jan.2014121*11111.1000122.100875MBRMBBR。2COD、NH4+-N、TN93.6%、85.8%91.5%、80.1%43.8%、41.3%MBRMBBRMBRCOD、NH4+-N80%MBBR。COD/NH4+-NNH4+-N。MBRMBBRX703.1Adoi10.3969/j.issn.1003-6504.2014.01.0231003-6504(2014)01-0114-06ComparisonofMBRandMBBRTreatingMaizeProcessingWastewaterYANHaihong12NIANYuegang1*YINQin1XIEYawei1YANGuangyu1GAOPeng11.StateKeyLaboratoryofEnvironmentalCriteriaandRiskAssessmentWaterPollutionControlResearchCenterChineseResearchAcademyofEnvironmentalScienceBeijing100012China2.CollegeofWaterScienceBeijingNormalUniversityBeijing100875ChinaAbstractDifferencesoftreatmentefficiencyandstableperformanceofMBRandMBBRdealingwithmaizeprocessingwastewaterwerestudied.ResultsshowedthatmeanremovalratesofCODNH4+-NTNinMBRandMBBRwere93.6%85.8%91.5%80.1%43.8%41.3%respectively.MBRexcelledatpollutantremovalefficiencywhichhadagoodqualityofeffluent.DuringtheexperimentremovalrateofCODNH4+-NforMBRwereabove80%basicallyrangesoforganicloadingandammonianitrogenloadingwerelessthanthatofMBBRwhichillustratedMBRhasabettercapacityofanti-shockloading.InadditionthehigherconcentrationofCOD/NH4+-NinfeedwatertheworseNH4+-Nremovalrateinthetwodevices.KeywordsmaizeprocessingwastewaterMBRMBBR、、、、。-[1]COD。。MBR、、、、、[2-5]。MBBR1、、、[6-8]。2。MBRMBBR2、。11.11.1.1MBBR1MBBRPP、、0.094、0.2、0.80.13m3。0.72m3/d27h200%100%。。20%。TN0、10%、20%30%。1.1.2MBRMBR、MBR2。MBR1.5m、0.2m0.18m3PVDF0.2μm0.2m3。0.24m3/d18h。、。1.2。、、、、。IC/A/O。IC。1。1.3CODCTL-12CODNH4+-NTN[9]JPSJ-605pHSartoriusPB-20PB-SpH。22.1CODMBRMBBRCOD2。COD146~2148mg/L754mg/LMBBRMBRCOD18.6~225.8mg/L、5.1~121.2mg/L107.0mg/L48.4mg/LCOD。3MBRCODMBBR2COD93.6%、85.8%MBR80%MBBRCOD80%1/3。MBRMBBRCOD11.3%3.5%。2。MBR1Table1QualityoffedwastewaterCOD/mg·L-1NH4+-N/mg·L-1TN/mg·L-1/℃pH146~21480.6~99.014~10117~306.8~8.02CODTable2RangeofCODconcentrationMBRMBBR/mg·L-15.118.627.1/mg·L-1121.2225.8241.0/mg·L-148.4107.0133.437MBR3000[10]。MBR。2CODMBR30~60mg/L50%MBBRCOD100~200mg/L37.0%30mg/L。MBR。4。2.2NH4+-NMBRNH4+-NMBBRNH4+-N1.5mg/LMBBR2mg/LMBR91.5%21.9%~99.0%MBBR80.1%11.1%~98.6%。NH4+-N4.2mg/LMBRMBBRNH4+-N15.4%4.0%。MBR、MBBR。5MBRNH4+-NMBBRMBBRMBR。MBRMBBR。MBBR1029NH4+-NNH4+-N。MBBR。352。COD/NH4+-N。6COD/NH4+-N。6COD/NH4+-N2MBBR。。2NH4+-NMBRNH4+-N0.5~1.0mg/L50%MBBRNH4+-N120.5~1.0mg/L、1.0~1.5mg/L22.5%21.2%。MBRNH4+-NMBBRNH4+-N。7。2.3TN2TN8。8MBRMBBRTN43.8%41.3%11.6%~86.7%12.9%~86.2%TN。MBRDO0.6~0.8mg/LTN[11-12]。MBRDO0.2~5.3mg/LMBR。DODOTN80%。9MBBRTN。9TN40.5%TN。MBBR。2.4COD10MBBRMBR20.06~0.60kg/kgMLSS·d0.08~0.45kg/kgMLSS·d。MBBRCOD70%MBRCOD80%MBBRCODMBR。MBRCOD、。2CODCOD。CODCODCOD[13]。2.5NH4+-N11。MBBRMBR0.0006~0.0266kg/kgMLSS·d、0.0005~0.0087kg/kgMLSS·dMBBRMBR。MBRMBR80%。MBBR0.01537kg/kgMLSS·d30%MBBR。2.6MBRMBR。。8min2min。30.240m3/d0.227m3/d5.4%。60d3‰NaClO。12。31MBRCOD、NH4+-NMBBR93.6%91.5%48.4mg/L1.5mg/L。MBRCOD13.9%、。COD/NH4+-NMBBR。2MBRMBBRTN43.8%41.3%DO。MBRMBBR。3MBR0.08~0.45kg/kgMLSS·d0.0005~0.0087kg/kgMLSS·dMBBRMBRCOD、NH4+-N80%。4MBRMBBR。[][1]WangYingHuangXiaYuanQipeng.Nitrogenandcarbonremovalsfromfoodprocessingwastewaterbyananoxic/aer-obicmembranebioreactor[J].ProcessBiochemistry200540:1733-1739.[2].[J].2007262:759-763.ChenRuiWangXiaoliFuXueqietal.Comparisonbetweenaerobicgranularsludgemembranebioreactorandgeneralmembranebioreactorontreatingsimulatedlivestockfarmwastewater[J].JournalofAgro-environmentScience2007262:759-763.(inChinese)[3].[J].2012321:75-80.HongJunmingYinJuan.EffectofdosingGAConthedeni-trificationperformanceofmembranebioreactor[J].ChinaEnvironmentalScience2012321:75-80.(inChinese)[4].[J].2010336:164-168.ChenQiangLiZhongbaoChenYangsheng.ComparativestudyoftwokindsofMBRfordyeingandprintingwastewa-tertreatment[J].EnvironmentalScience&Technology2010336:164-168.(inChinese)[5].[J].2010237:912-917.YangChongchenTianZhiyongSongYonghuietal.Wastewatertreatmentofdry-spunacrylicfiberbymembranebioreactor[J].ResearchofEnvironmentalScience2010237:912-917.(inChinese)[6].-[J].2010237:958-963.MaHuaminZhangLiqiuSunDezhi.Efficiencyofanoxic-oxicmoving-bedbiofilmreactortreatinglowtemperaturesewage[J].ResearchofEnvironmentalScience20102317:958-963.(inChinese)[7].-[J].20062710:2076-2080.ChenShengSunDezhiChenGuixiaetal.Treatmentoflandfillleachateusingsequentialanaerobic/aerobicmoving-bedbiofilmreactor[J].EnvironmentalScience20062710:2076-2080.(inChinese)[8].MBBRA/O[J].2012352:178-181.HuYoubiaoZhangWetaoHuangZhouman.ComparisonofeffectoftemperatureonMBBRandA/Oprocessforsewagetreatment[J].EnvironmentalScience&Technology2012352:178-181.(inChinese)[9].[M]..2002.MinistryofEnvironmentalProtectionofthePeople’sRepub-licofChina.WaterandWastewaterMonitoringAnalysisMethod[M].4thed.Beijing:ChinaEnvironmentalSciencePress.(inChinese)10]OgnierSWisniewskiCGrasmickA.Influenceofmacro-moleculeadsorptionduringfiltrationofmembranebioreactormixedliquorsuspension[J].JournalofMembraneScience20022091:27-37.[11].DOHRTMBR[J].2007396:887-890.LiShaofengCuiChongweiHuangJunlietal.InfluenceofDOandHRTonsimultaneousnitrificationanddenirificationinMBR[J].JournalofHarbinInstituteof
本文标题:MBR与MBBR工艺处理玉米深加工废水的对比分析闫海红
链接地址:https://www.777doc.com/doc-6538853 .html