不同熄焦方式的焦化废水对水环境影响分析

©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.()(ScienceandTechnology)Vol.34No16Dec.2009:2009-05-25.:(1955-),,,.:.E-mail:[e-mail]:10.3969/j.issn.1007-855x.2009.06.0171,2(1.,650032;2.,650032):,.,,,COD3.784.570.25.439,.:;;;:X824:A:1007-855X(2009)06-0082-04ComparisonofDifferentCokeQuenchingMethodsonWaterEnvironmentHEYu2qing1,YIYu2min2(1.YunnanEnvironmentalMonitoringCenter,Kunming650032,China;2.EnvironmentalInvestigationandExaminationCenterforConstrutionProjectsofYunnanProvince,Kunming650032,China)Abstract:ThecokingindustryhasdeveloppedremarkablyinYunanprovinceinrecentyears,however,italsobroughtrelativelyseriousevironmentproblem.Inproduction,theinfluencesofdifferentcokequenchingmethodsonenvironmentaredifferent.Asforitsinfluenceonwater,wetquenchingcoulddecreasethedischargeofwaterpollutantgreatly.Inthemeanwhile,ithaslessinfluenceonwaterenvironment.TakeacokingenterprisesinYun2nanprovinceforexample,thepullutantdischargedbydryquenchingwouldchangethefunctionoftherecipitentwaterfromthecasewatertothe,andtheCODvolativephenolcyanideammonianitrogenpetroleumsulfidewillincrease3.784.570.25.439timesrespectively.Therefore,dryquenchingisnotavailableinthisproject.Keywords:coking;wetquenching;dryquenching;waterenvironmentimpact0,..,,20042008,1.,.,.,,,[1,2].[3,4],,80%[5],M40M10[6].,2005[7].,.©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.(m3h-1)/(mgL-1)COD144.875.380.040.044.141.570.17157.373.420.040.043.811.440.1665.550-----78.050-----1.2,(GB3838-2002).2,,,25%.2Tab.2ThewatermonitoringresultsoftherecipientwaterCOD/(mgL-1)50.0010.0020.010.0050.01/(mgL-1)200.0050.210.050.2/%252011105,0.2m3/s,0.3m/s;0.7m3/s,0.35m/s.1000m.22.1,COD,-(Streetr-Phelps,S-P),1[8].COD0.05d-10.06d-10.06d-10.01d-1.C=C0exp(-K1x86400u)(1)386,:©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.=(CpQp+chQh)/(Qp+Qh)(2):C,mg/L;C0,mg/L;K1,d-1;x,m;u,m/s;Cp,mg/L;Qp,m3/s;Ch,mg/L;Qh,m3/s.2.2,,3.,COD2.3,.3Tab.3ThepollutantemissionunderdifferentsituationCOD/(kgh-1)/(kgh-1)/(kgh-1)/(kgh-1)/(kgh-1)/(kgh-1)7.8420.0060.0060.5990.2270.0258.4720.0060.0060.5990.2270.0253.275-----3.900-----2.3,,.,8:1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8.COD.1-6,,(GB3838-2002).26,,,1.61.95,43.9.,,,.COD48()©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.[2],.3,.,COD,,,.,.(91)586,:©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.[2],.[J].,2004,25(6):163-166.[3],.[J].,2008(1):7-11.[4],.[J].,2008,31(6):150-153.[5],,.[M].:,2004.[6]PartidrioMR.ElementsofStrategicEnvironmentalAssessment[J].EnvironmentalImpactAssessmentReview,2000,20:647-663.[7]OECD.ApplyingStrategicEnvironmentalAssessmentGoodPracticeGuidanceforDevelopmentCo-Operation.DACGuide2linesandReferenceSeries[R].2006.[8]BinaO.Re-conceptualisingStrategicEnvironmentalAssessment:TheoreticalOverrviewandCaseStudyfromChile[R].Phdthesis,UniveristyofCambridge,UK,2003.[9]RikiTherivel.StrategicEnvironmentalAssessmentinAction[M].EarthscanPubns.Ltd,2004.[10]IAIA.StrategicEnvironmentalAssessment:PerformanceCriteria[J/OL].SpecialPublicationSeriesNo.1,InternationalAs2sociationforImpactAssessment(),2002.[11].[J].,2008,(10):181-185.[12].[M].,,2006.[13],.[J].,2005(4):50-54.[14],.[J].,2007(10):3-7.[15]RikiTherivel.StrategicEnvironmentalAssessmentinAction[M].EarthscanPubns.Ltd,2004.[16].[M].:,1990.[17].[J].,2007(4):12-15.[18].[J].,2007(6):36-41.[19].[J].,2007(4):9-15.[20].[J].,2008,32(1):9-16.[21],,.[J].,2003,13(2):96-100.[22].[J].,2004,28(2):52-56.[23],,,.[J].,2006(4):29-34.[24],.[J].,2006(6):63-66.[25],.[J].(),2008,33(3):87-91.[26].[J].,2008(4):19-24.[27],,.[J].,2008,28(6):1249-1255.[28].[J].(),2008,42(3):477-450.(85):[1],.[J].,2004,35(6):41-43.[2],.[J].,2004,22(1):61-62.[3],.[J].,2002,48(1):3-4,12.[4].[J].,2004(3):43-46.[5],,.[J].,2005,27():124-125.[6].(2005)[Z].2005.12.2.[7]HJ/T2.3-93,[S].196,,: