洪河自然保护区湿地生态评价

32320116JournalofCapitalNormalUniversityNaturalScienceEditionNo．3June201112121231．1000482．1000483．100048．AHPAHP．、、、、．AHP．X8262011-01-051、、“”、“”“”、．《》EIAEnvironmentalImpactAssessment．、．21133°34'38″～133°46'29″47°42'18″～47°52'250.9km2、、．、．、“、、”．20081747234、、、、、、、44．1012、、、、6．1993．．33.1AnalyticHierarchyProcessAHPThomasL．Saaty20701．．213720111．CR≤0.1．11—9Cij1CiCj3CiCj5CiCj7CiCj9CiCj2、4、6、8CiCj1、1/2、…、1/9CiCjCij3.2、、、、2．AAHPC、、、、．①．．②．．③．．④．．⑤．．P13．23.334～8AHP．2AC2．CR＜0.1．CPCR＜0.1．2AC1C2C3C4C5C1112230.297621C2112230.297621C30.50.51120.157903C40.50.51120.157903C50.33330.33330.50.510.088955λmax=5.05879CI=0.01470RI=1.12CR=0.01312C1、C2、C3、C4、C53.42473．3．3C10.29762C20.29762C30.15790C40.15790C50.08895P10.166670.04968P20.166670.04968P30.666670.19841P40.343060.10184P50.081940.024112P60.575000.17172P70.500000.07906P80.500000.07906P90.142860.022610P100.714290.11283P110.142860.022610P120.900000.08015P130.100000.008913P1P2P3P4P5P6P7P8P9P10P11P12P13．3.5．、－8．ComprehensiveIndexCICEI=∑ni=1Ei×Wi1CEI0～1nWii∑ni=1Wi=1、i=1～13Eii．CEI4．4CEICEI10.85120.70.8530.550.740.40.55500.444.1AHP0.29762．0.15790．0.08895．4.2133．、．“”．．、、．35、、、．．、．．．“572011”．AHP．．．．、、．．．、．、、．1996．．4.3CEI=0.7440.740.7～0.850.7．．5AHPAHP．9～1230～50．．．2002“”．1．M．．2002224．2．M．．2005．3．J．．1994．10322－25．4．M．．1999．5．1999．M．．1999．6．J．．2001．17363－67．7．M．．2007．8．AHP．200738178－80．6739．J．．2008．21613－18．10．50J．．2004．196725－731．11．J．．2005．4141－6．12．J．．2004．22153－160．StudyonWetlandEcologicalAssessmentofHongheNatureReserveWangYihan12SunYonghua12LianJian12LiYina31．KeyLabof3DInformationAcquistionMOECollegeofResoureEnvironmentalandTourismCapitalNormalUniversityBeijing100048China2．KeyLabofResourcesEnvironmentandGISBeijingCityBeijing100048China3．BeijingGuoxinXingyeInternationalEngineeringConsultingCo．LtdAbstractWetlandecologicalassessmentisoneofthemostimportantpartsofwetlandstudy．HongheNatureReservewasselectedasthestudyareaforthisstudywhichiscompletedtypesandecosystemsandcanfullyreflecttheoverviewoforiginalwetlandsintheSanjiangPlaininNortheastChina．ThestudyusesAnalyticHierarchyProcessAHPmethodtodeterminethecorrelationbetweenthevariouselementsofelementslayerandtoperformintheformofnormalizedscoresthroughreferringtorelevantinformationanddocumentationaboutHonghewetlandsandaccordingtoassignmentstandardsforecologicalevaluationindexofNatureReserveproposedbyZhengYunweninsteadoftraditionalmethodssuchasAHPexpertscoringorquestionnairesurveystodeterminetheweight．Finallyweselectfivecategoriesdiversityraritynaturalnessstabilityandhumanthreat．Thereare13indicatorstobuildthehierarchyofwetlandevaluationofHonghesoastorealizequantitativeevaluationstudiesontheecologicalenvironmentofwetlandofHonghe．AftercalculatingtheHongheWetlandsEcologicalcomprehensiveevaluationindexCEIequals0.74．Itreflectsthattheecologicalstateoftheenvironmentisgood．KeywordsHonghewetlandAHPecologicalassessment．77