高科技企业科技人才评价与激励

2820073ScienceResearchManagementVo.l28,ZKMar,2007:2006-10-30.:(1980-),(),,,::1000-2995(2007)ZK-007-0045王小琴(西南科技大学经济管理学院,四川绵阳621010):本文针对我国科技人才评价中存在的重要问题,准确界定了科技人才以及科技企业,并对科技人才从智力素质身心素质能力素质绩效素质和思想品德素质等五个方面设置了一套较为完整的评价考核指标体系,应用模糊数学中模糊综合评价技术建立相关评价模型,较为准确地计算出科技人才综合素质模糊综合评价值,从而得到较为公正的评价结果,为薪酬激励奠定基础:科技人才;评价模型;模糊综合评价技术:C931:A1.1:,:[1],,2%,20%,50%,200312,,:,,,,,[2],,,,,[3]:,,;,,;,,,,,;,,;,,,,,,1.2!46!2007,,,,,[4],20033284,2254,19971380%3513%:1997578%2003687%:,2003R&D14,,2002128,2002121,137,75,2001124;R&D,2003113,200297,67,68,62,,R&D[5]:,,,2000491,1387,352,,9938;2003,40614114111056,,;,,,2003,846%:,,6741%5947%,,,,6291%,,,,;,:,42%50%,,2010,4500;,,,,,,,,,,,,,;:,,,,,WTO,,,,,,,[6],;,3,,35155%,1~33180%,11664%34445%[7],,:!47![8],,,,,,,,,,,,2对高科技企业科技人才的考评2.1,,,,,:()(),,,:∀,,;#,;∃:,;,,(),,,:∀;#,,,(),,,,:∀,,,;#,,,;∃,,,,,,,,,,,2.2,[9],CARDC,,,,(FDR),11)(1)F={f1f2,%,fn)(2)D={d1,d2,%dn}egD={d1,d2,d3,d4}={}2),!48!20073)(R),R(f)(d),4)DelphiAHPA=(a1,,a2,,an,)5)M(*+),B={b1,b2,bn}6)7)((F,D,A,1,2,3):D=DT*1231(3),11;2,I;38),9)1AdvancedTechnicalpersonnelevaluationsystemmodel:(),,11TheGraphofTechnicalPersonnelAppraisesIndexes(f1)00746(f11)00105(f12)00121(f13)00263(f14)00097(f15)00160(f2)01168(f21)00500(f22)00269(f23)00226(f24)00172(f221)00202(f222)00067(f231)00070(f232)00044(f233)00112(f3)00456(f31)00343(f32)00151(f311)00086(f312)00257(f321)00007(f322)00032(f323)00039(f324)00015(f325)00031(f326)00017:!49!(f4)03816(f41)00725(f411)00017(f412)00367(f413)00125(f414)00072(f415)00144(f42)01196(f43)00464(f431)00166(f432)00232(f433)00116(f44)00242(f441)00060(f442)00121(f443)00060(f45)00372(f451)00186(f452)00186(f46)00282(f461)00141(f462)00141(f47)00360(f471)00090(f472)00270(f5)03816(f51)00624(f511)00056(f512)00243(f513)00056(f514)00164(f515)00106(f52)02059(f521)00780(f522)00251(f523)00448(f524)00413(f525)00166(f53)01133AHP(,,),,,R,B=A*R,(ADelphiAHP),(,)B,,,,86-100,76-85,61-75,,,,,,,,,,!50!2007,:,,,3高科技企业人才的激励机制!,20~30%,70~80%,,,,,,,,WTO,,,,,,,,,30%,,100%,:,;,,:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,(/):,//,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:!51!:[1].[R].[93]0381993-10-27.[2]..[J].,2005(2):63.[3].[J].,2005(2):112.[4][5],.[J].,2005-09:76-77.[6].&&&[D].,2005-05:9-10.[7],.[J].,1998(10):7.[8].[J].,2002(1):35.[9].[C].&&&4,1997:128-129.TheevaluationandencouragementofthetechnicalpersonnelinadvancedtechnicalenterprisesWangXiaoqin(CollegeofEconomicManagement,SouthwestUniversityofScienceandTechnology,Mianyang621010,China)Abstract:Thedefinitionsoftechnicalpersonnelandadvancedtechnicalenterprisearepreciselydefinedbasedonsomeimportantproblemsinnowadaystechnicalpersonnelappraises,asuitofappraiseindexesoftechnicalpersonnelissetupfromfiveaspects.Andaqualifiedtechnicalpersonnelfuzzygeneralevaluationmodelisestablised,applyingfuzzygeneraltechniquesoffuzzymathematics.Furthermore,thevaluesofeverytechnicalpersonnelfuzzygeneralevaluation,whichisarelativejustappraiseoutcomearecalculated.Sequentially,itislaidthefoundationforsalarystimulation.Keywords:technicalpersonne;levaluationmode;lfuzzygeneralevaluationtechnique(76)[2]CHEA.RecognitionofAccreditingOrganizationsPolicyandProcedures[EB/OL].from[3]QAA.TheQualityAssuranceAgencyforHigherEducation:anintroduction[EB/OL].from[4]Brown,R.ThenewUKqualityframework[J].HigherEducationQuarterly.2000,54(4):323-342.[5].21[EB/OL].from[6]Luchaire,F.&Massit-Follea.F..Roleofthenationalevaluationcommittee[J].EuropeanEducation.1993,25(4):67-76.[7]CNE.IntroducingtheCNE-Maincharacheristicoftheevaluation[EB/OL].from[8]VSNU.Qualityassessmentmadetomeasure:Protocolfortheexternalassessmentofeducationalprogramme.[EB/OL].from(CollegeofEconomics&Management,SoutheastUniversity,Nanjing,210096,China)Abstract:InordertoprovidereferenceinformationforimprovinghighereducationevaluationstemsinChina,thehighereducationevaluationsystemsofU.S.A.,U.K.,France,Germany,andNetherlandsarecomparedformthedifferentaspect.Keywords:highereducation;qualityevaluation;evaluationsystem